Repulsive periodic orbit

The concepts of attraction, neutrality and repulsion can immediately be generalized to periodic orbits. Suppose that xq is the seed of a periodic orbit of length n, i.e. = xq. Then, clearly, xq is a fixed point... 

The idea that the vibrational enhancement of the rate is due to the attraetive potential for excited vibrational states of the reactant is closely related to the observation made long ago based on transition state theoiy [25,26]. Poliak [25] found that for vibrationally highly excited reactants the repulsive pods (periodic orbit dividing surface) is way out in die reactant valley, and the corresponding adiabatic barrier is shallow. Based on this theory one can explain why dynamical thresholds are observed in reactions with vibrationally excited reactants. The simplicity of the theory and its success for mostly collinear reactions has a real appeal. However, to reconcile the existence of a vibrationally adiabatic barrier with the capture-type behavior - which seems to be supported by the agreement of the calculated and experimental rate coefficients [23] -needs further study. 

Armed as we are now with the KAM theorem, the Center Manifold theorem, and the Stable Manifold theorem, we can begin to visualize the phase space of reaction dynamics. Returning to our original system (see Uncoupled Reaction Dynamics in Two Degrees of Freedom ), we now realize that the periodic orbit that sews together the half-tori to make up the separatrix is a hyperbolic periodic orbit, and it is not a fixed point of reflection. From our previous visualization of uncoupled phase-space dynamics, we know that the separatrix is completely nontwisted. In the terminology of Poliak and Pechukas, the hyperbolic periodic orbit is a repulsive PODS. ... 

The surface t v-1 is a particular example of what Wiggins has referred to as a hyperbolic manifold and what De Leon and Ling have termed a normally invariant hyperbolic manifoldd Hyperbolic manifolds are unstable and constitute the formal multidimensional generalization of unstable periodic orbits. Hyperbolic manifolds, like PODS, can be either repulsive or attractive. - If motion near a hyperbolic manifold falls away without recrossing it in configuration space, the hyperbolic manifold is said to be repulsive. On the other hand, it is often the case that motion near a hyperbolic manifold will cross it several times in configuration space as it falls away, and in this case it is said to be attractive. 

The first step in reducing the computational problem is to consider only the valence electrons explicitly, the core electrons are accounted for by reducing the nuclear charge or introducing functions to model the combined repulsion due to the nuclei and core electrons. Furthermore, only a minimum basis set (the minimum number of functions necessary for accommodating the electrons in the neutral atom) is used for the valence electrons. Hydrogen thus has one basis function, and all atoms in the second and third rows of the periodic table have four basis functions (one s- and one set of p-orbitals, pj, , Pj, and Pj). The large majority of semi-empirical methods to date use only s- and p-functions, and the basis functions are taken to be Slater type orbitals (see Chapter 5), i.e. exponential functions. 

The free electron resides in a quantized energy well, defined by k (in wave-numbers). This result Ccm be derived from the Schroedinger wave-equation. However, in the presence of a periodic array of electromagnetic potentials arising from the atoms confined in a crystalline lattice, the energies of the electrons from all of the atoms are severely limited in orbit and are restricted to specific allowed energy bands. This potential originates from attraction and repulsion of the electron clouds from the periodic array of atoms in the structure. Solutions to this problem were... 

Other rows in the periodic table follow a similar trend. However, for the third row, there is a general decrease in radius except for the last two or three elements in the transition series. The covalent radii of Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn are 126, 125, 124, 128, and 133 pm, respectively. This effect is a manifestation of the fact that the 3d orbitals shrink in size as the nuclear charge increases (going to the right), and the additional electrons populating these orbitals experience greater repulsion. As a result, the size decreases to a point (at Co and Ni), but after that the increase in repulsion produces an increase in size (Cu and Zn are larger than Co and Ni). 

The treatment of atoms with more than one electron (polyelectronic atoms) requires consideration of the effects of interelectronic repulsion, orbital penetration towards the nucleus, nuclear shielding, and an extra quantum number (the spin quantum number) which specifies the intrinsic energy of the electron in any orbital. The restriction on numbers of atomic orbitals and the number of electrons that they can contain leads to a discussion of the Pauli exclusion principle, Hund s rules and the aufbau principle. All these considerations are necessary to allow the construction of the modern form of the periodic classification of the elements. 

For the heavier elements of the Periodic Table, say the third transition series and the actinoids, the approximation that spin—orbit coupling is so small it can be treated as a perturbation on free-ion terms fails. Spin-orbit coupling rises rapidly with nuclear charge while interelectronic repulsion terms decrease with the diffuseness of the valence electron density of larger atoms. 

Electron spin has more subtle effects on atomic and molecular energies. The exclusion principle as stated above is really a consequence of a more profound influence of the spin on the way electrons move. Two elections with parallel spins (i.e. having the same value of ms) have a strong tendency to avoid each other in space. Suppose we put two elections into different orbitals. There is then no restriction on the relative spin directions. If they are parallel, however, the electrons keep apart and so the electrostatic repulsion between them is less than if the spins are anti-parallel. The former situation gives a lower total energy. We shall see below that this has consequences for the filling of degenerate orbitals, such as the p and d shells, in the periodic table. 

---