Relative protein value

The same shipment of raw, cooked and roasted glandless whole kernel cottonseed flours used in the FDA study was used to determine the protein efficiency ratio (PER) of each flour (8). The adjusted PER (Table II) of cooked (2.10) cottonseed was significantly higher than roasted (1.77) cottonseed. Protein retention efficiency (PRE) for roasted cottonseed (58.08) was lower than values for raw (60.54) and cooked (62.95) cottonseed. Relative protein values (RPV) indicated a utilization of 91, 91 and 96% of the protein in raw, roasted and cooked cottonseed, respectively. The multiplication of the (RPV) percentage utilization and the protein content of the cottonseed (Table I) results in the relative utilizable protein values (Table II). 

Table II. Average Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER), Relative Protein Value (RPV) and Relative Utilizable Protein for Raw, Roasted and Cooked Whole Kernel Cottonseed3...

Relative protein value (RPV) is the ability of a test protein, fed at various levels of intake, to support nitrogen balance, compared with a standard protein. 

PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid PV peroxide value PVDF polyvinylidene difluoride PVP polyvinylpyrrolidone PVPP polyvinylpolypyrolidone RAS retronasal aroma stimulator RDA recommended dietary allowance RF radio frequency RFI relative fluorescence intensity RI retention index RNU relative nitrogen utilization ROESY rotational nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy RP-HPLC reversed-phase HPLC RPER relative protein efficiency ratio RS resistant starch RT retention time RVP relative vapor pressure S sieman (unit of conductance)... 

Dietary Protein Relative Nutritional Value %Protein Required to Alleviate 90%... 

---