Regiochemistry both electronic

In the El cb mechanism, the direction of elimination is governed by the kinetic acidity of the individual p protons, which, in turn, is determined by the polar and resonance effects of nearby substituents and by the degree of steric hindrance to approach of base to the proton. Alkyl substituents will tend to retard proton abstraction both electronically and sterically. Preferential proton abstraction from less substituted positions leads to the formation of the less substituted alkene. This regiochemistry is opposite to that of the El reaction. 

In one case, the intermolecular Heck reaction of 3-pyridyltriflate with ethyl acrylate was accelerated by LiCl to give 159 [127,128], Here, both electronic and steric effects all favored p-substitution. In another case, however, electronic effects prevailed and complete a-substitution was observed. In the presence of an electron-donating substituent (i.e., a protected amine), 3-bromopyridine 160 was coupled with f-butoxyethylene to give 3-pyridyl methyl ketone 162 [126]. The regiochemistry of the Heck reaction was governed by inductive effects, leading to intermediate 161. 

Whereas 260 does not react with electron-rich dipolarophiles, the more delocalized isomiinchnone 261 does react with both electron-rich and -deficient dipolarophiles (154). A detailed FMO analysis is consistent with these observations and with the regiochemistry exhibited by diethyl ketene acetal and methyl vinyl ketone as shown in Scheme 10.36. The reaction of 261 with the ketene acetal to give 262 is LUMO-dipole HOMO-dipolarophile controlled (so-called lype III process). In contrast, the reaction of 261 with methyl vinyl ketone to give 263 is HOMO-dipole LUMO-dipolarophile controlled (so-called lype I process). In competition experiments using a mixture of A-phenylmaleimide and ketene acetal only a cycloadduct from the former was isolated. This result is consistent with a smaller energy gap for... 

The magnitude of the LCAO MO coefficients of the interacting orbitals permits a prediction of the expected oxetane regiochemistry. Both in the HOMO of a donor-substituted olefin and in the LUMO of an acceptor-substituted olefin, the coefficient of the unsubstituted carbon atom is the larger one in absolute value. Therefore, electron-poor olefins regioselectively afford the oxetane with the substituted carbon next to the oxygen. (Cf. Barl-trop and Carless, 1972.) In contrast, an electron-rich olefin predominantly yields the oxetane with the unsubstituted carbon next to the oxygen. (Cf. Scheme 22.)... 

The use of alkynes in transition metal catalyzed reactions is often complicated by their tendency to undergo cyclo-trimerization and -tetramerization. Thus, it is useful to note that a phosphite-modiHed catalyst, Ni(COD)2/tris(o-phenylphenyl) phosphite (TOPP), promotes codimerization of alkynes with methylenecyclopropane and its alkylidene analogs. Both electron-rich and electron-poor alkynes participate in cycloaddition with moderate regioselectivity. Opposite regiochemistry is sometimes observed with disubstituted alkylidene systems (equations 97-99). 

The presence of both electron-donor (alkoxy) and electron-acceptor (cyano or carbomethoxy) substituents at the 2- and 3-positions respectively of the pyridine ring, have unlocked its photocycloaddition chemistry, and in recent years several such reactions of these heteroarenes have been described. Previously reported additions of ethenes involved acrylonitrile derivatives, but similar processes are now described with vinyl ethers as the addend. In these systems, however, it seems that the regiochemistry of addition is very sensitive to steric influences. Thus, although the dihydroazocine (48) is formed selectively from the 3-cyano-... 

The regiochemistry of 13DC of nitrile oxides with various dipolarophiles was investigated theoretically at ab initio/DFT level by Rastelli and coworkers (Scheme 9) [101]. Taking formonitrile oxide 5a as the prototype 1,3-dipole and ethylene with both electron donating (e.g., methyl vinyl ether) and electron-withdrawing (e.g., acrylonitrile) substituents, the authors demonstrated that the 5-isoxazolines 30 are the predominant or exclusive adducts. Therefore, the experimental results are reproducible by calculations if electron correlation is introduced either via Moeller-Plesset perturbation tech-... 

Radicals, lacking a closed outer shell of electrons, are capable of reacting with double bonds. However, a radical requires only one electron for bond formation, unlike the electrophiles presented in this chapter so far, which consume both electrons of the tt bond upon addition. The product of radical addition to an alkene is an alkyl radical, and the final products exhibit anti-Markovnikov regiochemistry, similar to the products of hydroboration-oxidation (Section 12-8). 

When both the 1,3-dipoIe and the dipolarophile are unsymmetrical, there are two possible orientations for addition. Both steric and electronic factors play a role in determining the regioselectivity of the addition. The most generally satisfactory interpretation of the regiochemistry of dipolar cycloadditions is based on frontier orbital concepts. As with the Diels-Alder reaction, the most favorable orientation is that which involves complementary interaction between the frontier orbitals of the 1,3-dipole and the dipolarophile. Although most dipolar cycloadditions are of the type in which the LUMO of the dipolarophile interacts with the HOMO of the 1,3-dipole, there are a significant number of systems in which the relationship is reversed. There are also some in which the two possible HOMO-LUMO interactions are of comparable magnitude. 

Because the fluorine substituents both inductively and hyperconjugatively withdraw electron density from the C(2)-C(3) tt bond, the LUMO is located there, and Diels-Alder reactions take place exclusively with this bond [25] 1,1 -Difluoro allene and fluoroallene reaet readily with a large selection of cyclic and acyclic dienes, and acyclic dienes, [2+2] cycloadditions compete with the Diels-Alder processes As shown in the example in equation 79, a significantly different regiochemistry is observed for the [2+4] cycloaddition compared with the [2+2]... 

Both sets of observations confirm that the ring-opening process is subject to both steric and electronic influences, the combination of which produces some subtle effects in product distribution. Ultimately, the regiochemistry of the product must be decided after a cyclopropene-Fe(CO)4 complex is formed, but probably during the cleavage of one of the C-C bonds in the cyclopropene ring. 

---