Rectification ethanol

CH3)2. CH.CH2.CH3 mw 72.15, colorl liq, mp -159.9°, bp 27.85°, d 0.6201 g/cc at 20/4°, RI 1.35370. Sol in ethanol, ether, hydrocarbons and oils, insol in w. First prepd by Frankland in 1850 by treating iso-amyl iodide with Zn in w at 140° (Ref 2). It was isolated by Young from American petroleum (Ref 3). Present methods of prepn include fractional distn of petroleum and subsequent purification of the crude isopentane by rectification, as well as cracking and reforming of crude oil components and natural gasolines in oil refineries (Refs 4 7)... 

For example, during the dehydration of ethanol with toluene a new ternary azeotrope is formed (Fig. 2.42). Due to the phase separation of the added toluene from water, toluene can be continuously recycled using rectification equipment with two columns. 

Fig. 2.42 Continuous rectification flow sheet for the dehydration of ethanol...

Derivation By standard esterification procedure using ethanol and oxalic acid. The final purification calls for unusual technique and equipment. The last traces of water are most difficult to remove, and this is accomplished by a special step in the rectification. 

Some agro-food industry by-products are quite well adapted to alcoholic fermentation. Ethanol obtained by distillation is a good combustible that, as -methanol, can be easily stored and transported, our dual-fuel engines are adapted to its utilization, Fuel savings are actually about 80 %. This ethanol does not demand as strict a rectification as in the case of use in mixture with fuels, The alcoholic degree must be between 90 and 96 Gay Lussac. 

Ballweg, A.H. Briischke, H.E.A. Schneider, W.H. Tusel, G.F. Boddeker, K.W. Wenzlaff, A. Pervaporation membranes. An economical method to replace conventional dehydration and rectification columns in ethanol distilleries. Fifth International Symposium on Alcohol Fuel Technology, Auckland, New Zealand, May 13-18, 1982. 

The recovery of the waste streams was complex, since a series of azeotropes had to be separated. Different alternatives were simulated and initial cost estimates were made by computer simulation alone. The first simulations were based only on the physical properties incorporated in the software data bank. In a second step additional physical properties mostly liquid liquid equilibrium (LLE) data were measured in order to increase the accuracy of the simulation of the most critical steps. First screening experiments of pervaporation to eliminate water and polar impurities such as methanol and ethanol from the tetrahydrofuran (THF) mixtures were stopped early, as it appeared that the alternatives based on counter current extraction (CCE) and rectification alone were less expensive and probably more robust. The most promising processes were piloted. The pilot experiments allowed confirmation of the results of the simulations and allowed the simulations to be updated to reflect the pilot results. A large part of the work during the pilot experiments was to verify the behaviour of further impurities contaminating the solvents, which had not been taken into account in the first screening. All impurity substances had to be purged efficiently, so that they would not accumulate after repeated recoveries of the solvents. 

Process 2 - Process Description. The impurities in the raw material form azeotropes with tetrahydrofuran and ethylacetate. All the azeotropes had to be separated by a combination of counter current extraction and rectification. The aim was to recover ethylacetate and THF. The following major problems had to be solved by a solvent recovery unit 1) separate the THF/ methanol and the THF/ ethanol azeotropes, 2) dewater the THF and ethylacetate (azeotropes), 3) separate THF (Atmospheric boiling point (Tb) = 65.7°C) from ethylacetate (Tb= 77°C) and methylacetate (Tb = 57.1°C). 

A CCE-column (116) and 2 rectification columns (117 and 118) were necessary to eliminate methanol (MY), ethanol, methylacetate, water as well as further high boiling impurities such as acetic acid before the final rectification of THF and ethylacetate in column (119) (Figure 7). 

The third column (118) was a simple rectification column in which decane was separated from THF/ ethylacetate. Decane was recycled into the extraction column 116. Compared to different alternatives, which were simulated, this process has the following advantages. Water was eliminated from the ethylacetate/ THF-mixtures before their rectification. This approach takes advantage of the fact that the VLE-data of ethylacetate/ THF are more favorable than the ones of ethylacetate/ THF/ water. The counter current extraction with decane allows an efficient separation of the polar impurities such as methanol, ethanol, and acetic acid. Furthermore decane eliminated the water from the recovered solvent mixture (extractive rectification in column 117). Methylacetate posed a further problem and a rectification column was necessary to separate it from THF. The stripping column 117 combined the dewatering and the elimination of methylacetate. 

The distillation and rectification is conducted in columns with a variable number of trays, the construction and design of which vary significantly. The setup of the distillation unit is directly linked to the quality requirements for the ethanol produced. The distillation yields a raw alcohol with an alcohol content of approximately 85-87%. The rectification is necessary to increase the alcohol content and to remove so-called fusel oils, which are C3-C5 alcohols. In modern distillation units, these two basic steps are integrated to optimize the energy requirement for the process. 

At best, distillation and rectification will only achieve 95-96% pure ethanol. Engine fuel must be 99.9% pure, which can be achieved via a further step called absoluta-tion. Here, a third chemical (expident) is added to the alcohol-water-mixture producing a mixture of alcohol-chemical plus water-chemical. Afterward the chemical is removed from both mixtures and reused. 

Fig. 5.2-34 Internal concentration and temperature profiles in a rectification column for the fractionation of the system methanol/ethanol/propanol...

It should be noted that the dehydration of the ethanol by the azeotropic rectification requires considerable operational and energy expenses. Ethanol dehydration technologies using the adsorption on molecular sieves and evaporation through the membrane are less power consuming ones. However, the ethanol dehydration by the evaporation through the membrane requires significant capital investment and the smooth/uninterrupted operation of the factory. 

Recovery of Organic Solvents. In connection with the recovery of volatile organic substances from aqueous solution, as in the separation of acetone or ethanol from aqueous solutions containing less than 5 per cent solute, Othmer, et al (131, 132) have shown that considerable savings can be expected in heat requirements if extraction by an appropriate high-boiling solvent followed by distillation of the extracted solute is used, as compared with direct rectification. 

In the indirect ethylene hydratization process ethylene is contacted at 10-15 bar and 65-85 °C with concentrated sulfuric acid in a bubble column reactor. Mono and diethyl sulfate form and are hydrolyzed later (70-100 °C) to ethanol. Diethyl ether is the main side-product of the process (up to 10%). In the downstream of the reactor, ethanol and diethyl ether are distilled from the diluted sulfuric add, neutralized, and separated by rectification. The diluted sulfuric add produced in the process (45-60% sulfuric add after water addition) is reenergy intensive and problematic with resped to corrosion issues. Despite its relatively complex process scheme, the total ethanol yield in the indired ethylene hydratization process is only 86%. One advantage of the indired process, however, is that it also works with diluted ethylene feeds (e.g., feeds containing larger amounts of methane and ethane). 

Table 16.1 Process comparison of a one- and two-column system for ethanol rectification. 

---