Reaction, affinity degree

Figure A2.1.9. Chemically reacting systems, (a) The entropy. S as a fiinction of the degree of advancement of the reaction at constant U and V. (b) The affinity Aas a fiinction of for the same reacting system. Equilibrium is reached at 0.623 where tiis a maxuniim and A= 0.

The oxygen affinity of the derivative was shown to be about half that of unmodified hemoglobin under similar conditions, but a degree of cooperativity was preserved. Kquilihrium and kinetic ligand-binding studies on this derivative have been interpreted (62) to show a perturbed R state. It is beheved that although the reaction is between the two P-chains, aP-dimers function independentiy, probably through a flexible connection. 

The variation in the AH of this reaction for a series of olefins is essentially governed by the differences in the proton affinities of the olefins, and these are steeply graded according to the degree of substitution and the nature of the substituents in the vicinity of the double bond (Table 1). 

Full and partial uncompetitive inhibitory mechanisms, (a) Reaction scheme for full uncompetitive inhibition indicates ordered binding of substrate and inhibitor to two mutually exclusive sites. The presence of inhibitor prevents release of product, (b) Lineweaver-Burk plot for full uncompetitive inhibition reveals a series of parallel lines and an increase in the 1/v axis intercept to infinity at infinitely high inhibitor concentrations. In this example, Ki = 3 iulM. (c) Replot of Lineweaver-Burk slopes from (b) is linear, confirming a full inhibitory mechanism, (d) Reaction scheme for partial uncompetitive inhibition indicates random binding of substrate and inhibitor to two mutually exclusive sites. The presence of inhibitor alters the rate of release of product (by a factor P) and the affinity of enzyme for substrate (by a factor a) to an identical degree, while the presence of substrate alters the affinity of enzyme for inhibitor by a. (e) Lineweaver-Burk plot for partial uncompetitive inhibition reveals a series of parallel lines and an increase in the 1/v axis intercept to a finite value at infinitely high inhibitor concentrations. In this example, Ki = 3 iulM and a = = 0.5. (f) Replot of Lineweaver-Burk slopes from (e) is hyperbolic, confirming a partial inhibitory mechanism... 

For the purposes of this review, the key concept embedded in equation (1) is the chemical affinity term, which is expressed as 1 — Q/K. The chemical affinity of a system is related to the free energy of the reaction and is a measure of the degree of departure from equilibrium (i.e.,/(AG) = 1 — Q/K). The form of the chemical affinity term indicates that as the concentrations of dissolved elements build up in solution, the system approaches saturation in a rate-limiting solid and the overall dissolution reaction slows down, and, at equilibrium, the rate would be zero. In the case of glass dissolution, there are many circumstances, which are reviewed below, where the rate behaviour does not comply with these expectations. 

---