Rate constants from experimentation

Sections 3.1 and 3.2 considered this problem Given a complex kinetic scheme, write the differential rate equations find the integrated rate equations or the concentration-time dependence of reactants, intermediates, and products and obtain estimates of the rate constants from experimental data. Little was said, however, about how the kinetic scheme is to be selected. This subject might be dismissed by stating that one makes use of experimental observations combined with chemical intuition to postulate a reasonable kinetic scheme but this is not veiy helpful, so some amplification is provided here. 

Determine the order of a reaction, its rate law, and its rate constant from experimental data (Examples 13.1 and L3.2 and Self-Tests 13.2 and 13.3). 

Swain (7) has discussed the general problem of determining rate constants from experimental data of this type and some of the limitations of numerical curve-fitting procedures. He suggests that a reaction progress variable for two consecutive reactions like 5.3.2 be defined as... 

How to obtain the rate equation and rate constant from experimental data... 

Determining the Order and Rate Constant from Experimental Data... 

We consider three simple schemes, shown in Fig. 6.11, and examine the effect of homogeneous coupled reactions on the current at the electrode they are CE, EC, and EC, where E represents an electrochemical step (at the electrode) and C a chemical step (in solution). The equations to calculate the rate constants from experimental measurements for the various types of electrode can be found in the specialized literature. In most studies the electrochemical step has been considered reversible—thus, in the following, the rate constant for the electrode reaction is not indicated. 

The type of approach to be used and its advantage over the conventional approach is illustrated in Section II,A by a brief discussion of the problem of determining the value of the rate constants from experimental data for reversible monomolecular systems. 

The development of the main ideas are presented in Sections II, IV,A, VI,A, and VII. The detailed examples are contained in Sections III, IV,B, and VI,B and are not necessary for the main development. These examples are built around the determination of rate constants from experimental data. This should not be considered to mean that this is the only, or even the most important, use that can be made of this approach to reaction rate problems. 

Standing of the structural features of the systems, the search for the method provides an excellent framework for the structural discussion. It must be remembered, however, that the insight obtained from the general analysis is much more broadly useful than merely providing a method for the extraction of the rate constants from experimental data. In the new method, quantities that correspond to the constants c,- and X, in Eq. (6) are determined but in addition, their relation to the rate constants also appears. 

The above presentation has centered about the development of a general method for determining rate constants from experimental data. During the course of this development, much information has been obtained on the structure of these systems. Some of this information will be briefly summarized and extended in this section. 

A series of CoMo/Alumina-Aluminum Phosphate catalysts with various pore diameters was prepared. These catalysts have a narrow pore size distribution and, therefore, are suitable for studying the effect of pore structure on the deactivation of reaction. Hydrodesulfurization of res id oils over these catalysts was carried out in a trickle bed reactor- The results show that the deactivation of reaction can be masked by pore diffusion in catalyst particle leading to erro neous measurements of deactivation rate constants from experimental data. A theoretical model is developed to calculate the intrinsic rate constant of major reaction. A method developed by Nojcik (1986) was then used to determine the intrinsic deactivation rate constant and deactivation effectiveness factor- The results indicate that the deactivation effectiveness factor is decreased with decreasing pore diameter of the catalyst, indicating that the pore diffusion plays a dominant role in deactivation of catalyst. 

The kinetics problems of interest in chain reactions, as in all complex systems, are to predict the conversion and product distribution as a function of time from the rate equations for the individual reactions, or to decide on the reactions involved and evaluate their rate constants from experimental data on the conversion and product distribution. The methods are illustrated... 

Swain (7) discussed the general problem of determining rate constants from experimental data of this type and... 

The various procedures for obtaining rate constants from experimental data are next considered. In most of these, the ionic yields are deduced solely from their power absorption from the observing rf field. Expressions for the rate constant thus depend on the nature of the power absorption, according to whether (1) the ion is in free flight (zero collisions in the limit of zero pressure), (2) it is experiencing elastic, nonreactive collisions, or (3) it is undergoing chemically reactive collisions. The three different procedures which have been developed are now considered in turn. 

Equations (7) and (12) not only provide the vehicle for extracting rate constants from experimental data, they also provide the test for whether the disappearance of a particular reactant follows first- or second-order kinetics. To apply this test with rigor, it is desirable to test the adherence of the data to a particular mathematical law for several half-lives, i.e., for 75-95% of total reaction. (One half-life is the time for the concentration of A to fall from... 

Although the Lindemann model can explain the occurrence of a fall-off region, it predicts its location to occur at several orders of magnitude higher pressures than experimentally observed. Related to this, calculated k2 rate constants from experimental high-pressure rate constants were found to be unrealistically large. One major cause of these problems is the inherent assumption that AB and AB° can be treated as different species. If so, then we obtain with AGa Eo... 

The units of k in equation (3.2.14) have already been defined as M s. The significance of the inclusion of concentration units in second order as distinct from first order rate constants, will be seen to be important in the correct evaluation of rate constants from experimental records. 

In aqueous solution, the only well known experimental kinetic parameters are the rate coefficients (and in some cases their temperature dependence). To model this system as accurately as possible, the simulation also requires the microscopic parameters that describe diffusion and reaction. For diffusion controlled reactions, it was assumed the experimental rate constant obs = diff where dtff is Smoluchowski s steady state rate constant. From experimental findings [7], it is found that the spin statistical factor cts is 1 for reactions involving the hydroxyl radical. Therefore, for the OH -f- OH and OH -I- R reactions, the microscopic parameters were calculated from the expression diff = 4nD aa%fi, with as = 1 (based on the analysis done by Buxton and Elliot [26]) and being for identical reactants, but unity otherwise. From preliminary simulations it was found that both the phases and magnitude of the spin polarisation remained relatively the same using as = 0.25 for the OH -i- OH and OH + R reactions. Hence, the as parameter was found to be unimportant in explaining the observed E/A spin polarisation on the escaped 2-propanolyl radicals. 

---