Radiative decay rate modification

The second factor ( is instead more complex and it is related to both the radiative and non-radiative decay rates modification due to the presence of a scattering environment. We will now consider two of the most interesting examples of molecular emission near metallic systems. 

In about 2000, my laboratory started to study the interactions of fluorophores with metallic nanoparticles, both solution-based and surface-immobilized. Our findings agreed with other workers whom had observed increases in fluorescence emission coupled with a decrease in the fluorophores radiative lifetime. Subsequently, we applied classical far-field fluorescence descriptions to these experimental observations, which ultimately suggested a modification in the fluorophores s intrinsic radiative decay rate, a rate thought to be mostly unchanged and only weakly dependent on external environmental factors. This simple description, coupled with what seemed like a limitless amount of applications led to a paper published by our laboratory in 2001 entitled Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence , or MEF, a term now widely used today almost a decade later. 

To examine the role of the LDOS modification near a metal nanobody and to look for a rationale for single molecule detection by means of SERS, Raman scattering cross-sections have been calculated for a hypothetical molecule with polarizability 10 placed in a close vicinity near a silver prolate spheroid with the length of 80 nm and diameter of 50 nm and near a silver spherical particle with the same volume. Polarization of incident light has been chosen so as the electric field vector is parallel to the axis connecting a molecule and the center of the silver particle. Maximal enhancement has been found to occur for molecule dipole moment oriented along electric field vector of Incident light. The position of maximal values of Raman cross-section is approximately by the position of maximal absolute value of nanoparticle s polarizability. For selected silver nanoparticles it corresponds to 83.5 nm and 347.8 nm for spheroid, and 354.9 nm for sphere. To account for local incident field enhancement factor the approach described by M. Stockman in [4] has been applied. To account for the local density of states enhancement factor, the approach used for calculation of a radiative decay rate of an excited atom near a metal body [9] was used. We... 

---