Quantum transition-state theory formalism

Several approaches to the issue of tight binding ionic mobility in the channel system can be explored. In the past decade, quantum transition state theory has matured to the point that it is possible to consider sophisticated treatments that include formally accurate... 

In the present chapter, we have described a formalism in which overbarrier contributions to chemical reaction rates are calculated by variational transition state theory, and quantum effects on the reaction coordinate, especially multidimensional tunneling, have been included by a multidimensional transmission coefScient. The advantage of this procedure is that it is general, practical, and well validated. 

KJ is Eyring s equilibrium constant in the transition state theory rate constant [23 24]. The derivation of equation (24) here is based upon quantum dynamical arguments. Compared to eq.(9.14) in reference [24], except for the derivation paths (that are totally different), both equations are formally identical. 

In the second section the calculation of the rate constant was discussed from the classical mechanics viewpoint. Voth, Chandler, and Miller derived a quantum mechanical expression for the rate constant based on a path integral formalism. Using this expression as a starting point, Voth and O Gormani derived an effective barrier model to allow the calculation of the barrier tunneling contribution to the quantum mechanical rate constant for reactions in dissipative baths. The spirit of their derivation is quite similar to that which treats Grote-Hynes theory o as transition state theory for a parabolic barrier in a harmonic bath. 

The passage over the barrier is treated as a classical event all quantum effects are ignored. This assumption makes the conventional transition-state theory a hybrid formalism, as also quantum-mechanical expressions appear in the rate expression, through the partition functions involved in assumption 2. 

An overall scheme for quantitative assessment of the influence of tunnelling effects upon the reaction rate has been developed by Miller [113, 114]. The simplest method for calculating the tunnelling rate constant is based on the theory of transition state with correction for tunnelling. This correction consists in formal replacement of the classical motion along the reaction coordinate with the quantum motion. This approach was first formulated in the works by Bell [115]. 

Besides charge transfer interactions, dipolar coupling between ttk transitions of bases may lead to delocalization of the excited states. In order to obtain some guidelines for our experimental studies, we have undertaken the calculation of excited Frank-Condon states within the framework of the exci-ton theory [26]. These studies were enriched by combining data from quantum chemistry and molecular dynamics calculations in collaboration with Krystyna Zakrzewska and Richard Lavery [26,27,27-29]. The general formalism is described in the Chapter by E. Bittner and A. Czader in the present volume. 

Having examined the leading interpretations of the quantum formalism, a more general theory of atomic structure, consistent with all points of view, could conceivably now be recognized. The first aspect, never emphasized in chemical theory, but fundamental to matrix mechanics, is that the observed frequencies that determine the stationary energy states of an atom, always depend on two states and not on individual electronic orbits. The same conclusion is reached in wave mechanics, without assumption. It means that an electronic transition within atoms requires the interaction between emitter and receptor states and the frequency condition AE(An) = hu, for all pairs in n. This condition by itself offers no rationale for the occurrence of the... 

In our introduction to the physics of NMR in Chapter 2, we noted that there are several levels of theory that can be used to explain the phenomena. Thus far we have relied on (1) a quantum mechanical treatment that is restricted to transitions between stationary states, hence cannot deal with the coherent time evolution of a spin system, and (2) a picture of moving magnetization vectors that is rooted in quantum mechanics but cannot deal with many of the subder aspects of quantum behavior. Now we take up the more powerful formalisms of the density matrix and product operators (as described very briefly in Section 2.2), which can readily account for coherent time-dependent aspects of NMR without sacrificing the quantum features. 

---