Quantitation, additives Light stabilisers

David et al. [184] have shown that cool on-column injection and the use of deactivated thermally stable columns in CGC-FID and CGC-F1D-MS for quantitative determination of additives (antistatics, antifogging agents, UV and light stabilisers, antioxidants, etc.) in mixtures prevents thermal degradation of high-MW compounds. Perkins et al. [101] have reported development of an analysis method for 100 ppm polymer additives in a 500 p,L SEC fraction in DCM by means of at-column GC (total elution time 27 min repeatability 3-7 %). Requirements for the method were (i) on-line (ii) use of whole fraction (LVI) and (iii) determination of high-MW compounds (1200 Da) at low concentrations. Difficult matrix introduction (DMI) and selective extraction can be used for GC analysis of silicone oil contamination in paints and other complex analytical problems. 

Oligomeric additives with broad MWD tend to be a problem in conventional HPLC conditions. In cases where no interest exists in the oligomer distribution it is common practice to solve the problem by creating a uniform structural unit useful for analysis. For example, isocratic (or gradient) LC-UV was used for the determination of the polymeric light stabiliser Tinuvin 622 in polyolefins using dissolution (toluene)/derivatisation (TBAH)-precipitation (alcohol) the diol formed was quantitatively determined by NPLC [653]. 

Direct UV spectrophotometry for polymer/addi-tive mixtures is thus mainly applied for UV transparent polymeric matrices (e.g. PE) and is not suitable for the detection of additives in polymers absorbing above about 250 nm (e.g. styrenics). Only polymer additives which are absorbers of UV radiation (such as light stabilisers and other compounds containing UV-active structural moieties) can be detected. For quantitative determinations the UV approach requires standards or measurement of extinction coefficients. 

---