Pure residual functions

The molar residual function m (or m ) is the difference between molar property m (or m.) of a real mixture (or pure substanco i) aed the value m (or rn, ) it would have were il an ideal gas at the same temparature (7), pressure (P), and composition ... 

As mentioned before, Approach A (also called supercritical compounds can be handled easily and that besides the phase equilibrium behavior various other properties such as densities, enthalpies including enthalpies of vaporization, heat capacities and a large number of other important thermodynamic properties can be calculated via residual functions for the pure compounds and their mbctures. For the calculation besides the critical data and the acentric factor for the equation of state and reliable mixing rules, only the ideal gas heat capacities of the pure compounds as a function of temperature are additionally required. A perfect equation of state with perfect mixing rules would provide perfect results. This is the reason why after the development of the van der Waals equation of state in 1873 an enormous number of different equations of state have been suggested. 

The same can be said for all the expressions for jx- ix° in Equations (8.30). They all express the difference between the chemical potential of a solute species in a real system, and the same potential in an ideal system under the same conditions. The term residual function is strictly speaking applied only when the ideal system is an ideal gas, so differences from other states such as infinitely dilute solutions or pure phases are called deviation functions (Ewing and Peters, 2000). 

A complete set of intermolecular potential functions has been developed for use in computer simulations of proteins in their native environment. Parameters have been reported for 25 peptide residues as well as the common neutral and charged terminal groups. The potential functions have the simple Coulomb plus Lennard-Jones form and are compatible with the widely used models for water, TIP4P, TIP3P and SPC. The parameters were obtained and tested primarily in conjunction with Monte Carlo statistical mechanics simulations of 36 pure organic liquids and numerous aqueous solutions of organic ions representative of subunits in the side chains and backbones of proteins... 

Where C is a matrix of component concentrations or sample properties, S is a matrix of basis vectors (pure component spectra, or spectral profiles reflecting a pure sample property), and E and Ec are model residuals. The direct model expresses the analyzer responses (X) as a function of concentrations, whereas the inverse model expresses concentrations as a function of the analyzer responses. Because the former is more in line with the Beer-Lambert Law (absorbance = concentration x absorptivity), it is given the label direct . 

Several of the reactions mentioned in this chapter proved to be successful for diastere-omerically pure but racemic substrates 355. No reason is seen why racemization or epimerization should occur and therefore application to optically active substrates is possible without expecting difficulties. Of course, one must take into account sensitive functional groups, eventually being present in the residues R and R. ... 

---