Properties of Bar

George and Serkadowski [40] have described the physical properties of bar soaps and the use of different functional additives in various traditional and synthetic soap bases. 

TI-3AI-2.5V Minimum tensile properties of bar, sheet, strip, and foil... 

Ti-5AI-2.5Sn ELI Minimum tensile properties of bars, forgings, and rings... 

Beta C Guanmteed minimum tensile properties of bar and wire... 

Beta C Tensile properties of bar and rod as a function of cold work and heat treatment... 

L. A. Webber, Thermodynamic and Eelated Properties of Ouygen fromTripk Point to 500 K at Pressures to 1000 Bar, NASA Reference Pubheation 1011, NBSIR 77—865, National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colo., 1977. 

Milling not only provides intimate mixing, but also eliminates variation in ribbon thickness and cmshes lumpy materials, eg, overdried soap, which might impact finished bar texture. Milling is also used for the formation of the proper bar soap crystalline phase, which plays a critical role in both the performance properties of the soap bar and the handling characteristics of the in-process soap. For example, too hot a milling temperature can create sticky soap that is difficult to process further. 

These surfactants, in conjunction with soap, produce bars that may possess superior lathering and rinsing in hard water, greater lather stabiUty, and improved skin effects. Beauty and skin care bars are becoming very complex formulations. A review of the Hterature clearly demonstrates the complexity of these very mild formulations, where it is not uncommon to find a mixture of synthetic surfactants, each of which is specifically added to modify various properties of the product. Eor example, one approach commonly reported is to blend a low level of soap (for product firmness), a mild primary surfactant (such as sodium cocoyl isethionate), a high lathering or lather-boosting cosurfactant, eg, cocamidopropyl betaine or AGS, and potentially an emollient like stearic acid (27). Such benefits come at a cost to the consumer because these materials are considerably more expensive than simple soaps. 

Eig. 25. Variations ia average mechanical properties of as-roUed 2.5-cm bars of plain carbon steels, as a function of carbon content (1). 

The two corrosion-resistant alloys presented ia Table 5 rely on chromium and molybdenum for their corrosion resistance. The corrosion properties of IJ1 timet are also enhanced by tungsten. Both alloys are available ia a variety of wrought product forms plates, sheets, bars, tubes, etc. They are also available ia the form of welding (qv) consumables for joining purposes. 

Table 9. Average Impurity Levels and Physical Properties of Wire-Bar Copper Samples ...

Properties of copper—tin—lead alloys are Hsted in Table 10. The members of the tin bronze alloy group are cast using the centrifugal, continuous, permanent, plaster, and sand molding methods. Leaded tin—bronze alloys have minimum tensile strengths of 234—248 MPa (34,000—36,000 psi) as cast in sand molds, whereas the minimum tensile strengths for high leaded tin—bronze alloys are 138—207 MPa (20,000—30,000). The values are based on measurement of test bars cast in sand molds. 

Properties of copper—nickel alloys are Hsted in Table 14. The alloys in the copper—nickel group have been successfully cast using the centrifugal, investment, permanent, and sand molding methods. The minimum tensile strengths on test bars cast in sand molds are 207—310 MPa (30,000—45,000 psi). 

Many of the Vargaftik values also appear in Ohse, R. W, Handbook of Thetmodynamic and Ttanspoti Ftopetiies of Alkali Metals, Blackwell Sci. Pubs., Oxford, 1985 (1020 pp.). This source contains superheat data. Saturation and superheat tables and a diagram to 30 bar, 1650 K are given by Reynolds, W. C., Thetmodynamic Fropetiies in S.I., Stanford Univ. publ., 1979 (173 pp.). For a Mollier diagram from 0.1 to 250 psia, 1300 to 2700°R, see Weatherford, W. D., J. C. Tyler, et al., WADD-TR-61-96, 1961. An extensive review of properties of the solid and the saturated liquid is given by Alcock, C. B., M. W. Chase, et al.,y. Fhys. Chem. Ref Data, 23, 3 (1994) 385-497. 

---