Principal component analysis of matrix

The principal component analysis of matrix S (PCAS) (Vajda et al. 1985) investigates the effect of the change in parameters on the value of the objective function. The objective function Q can be approximated (Vajda et al. 1985) using the local sensitivity matrix S ... 

The method of principal component analysis of matrix S (PCAS) was discussed in Sect. 5.3. The PCAS method allows the identification of the most important parameters related to selected simulation results. Therefore, if the objective function includes the concentrations of the important and necessary species (see Sect. 7.2) and the investigated parameters are the rate coefficients (or A-factors) of the reaction steps (Vajda et al. 1985 Vajda and Tur yi 1986 Turanyi 1990b Xu et al. 1999 Liu et al. 2005), it is also applicable for the generation of a reduced mechanism containing less reaction steps. A further development of the PCAS method is functional principal component analysis (fPCA) (Gokulakrishnan et al. 2006). This method facilitates the investigation of temporal and spatial changes in the importance of reaction steps in reaction—diffusiOTi systems. 

Another method for removing redundant reaction steps is the principal component analysis of matrix F PCAF), where V=[dfjdxk (Turmyi et al. 1989 Tomlin et al. 1992 Borger et al. 1992 Heard et al. 1998 Carslaw et al. 1999 Zsely and Turanyi 2001 Bahlouli et al. 2014). Here the sensitivity of the net rates of production of species to changes in the input parameters is investigated. Using the PCAF method, the objective function has the following form ... 

The essential degrees of freedom are found by a principal component analysis of the position correlation matrix Cy of the cartesian coordinate displacements Xi with respect to their averages xi), as gathered during a long MD run ... 

Both component and factor analysis as defined by equations 17 and 18 aim at the identification of the causes of variation in the system. The analyses are performed somewhat differently. For the principal components analysis, the matrix of correlations defined by equation 10 is used. For the factor analysis, the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix that normally would have a value of one are replaced by estimates of the amount of variance that is within the common factor space. This problem of separation of variance and estimation of the matrix elements is discussed by Hopke et al. (4). 

Other strong advantages of PCR over other methods of calibration are that the spectra of the analytes have not to be known, the number of compounds contributing to the signal have not to be known on the beforehand, and the kind and concentration of the interferents should not be known. If interferents are present, e.g. NI, then the principal components analysis of the matrix, D, will reveal that there are NC = NA -I- NI significant eigenvectors. As a consequence the dimension of the factor score matrix A becomes (NS x NC). Although there are NC components present in the samples, one can suffice to relate the concentrations of the NA analytes to the factor score matrix by C = A B and therefore, it is not necessary to know the concentrations of the interferents. 

LPRINT PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF THE CORRELATION MATRIX ... 

The first part of the output contains the principal component analysis of the correlation matrix discussed later in Section 3.5. In addition to the residuals, goodness-of-fit, parameter estimates and bounds, the Durbin-Wattson D statistics is also printed by the module. 

As seen from Fig. 5.3, the substrate concentration is most sensitive to the parameters around t = 7 hours. It is therefore advantageous to select more observation points in this region when designing identification experiments (see Section 3.10.2). The sensitivity functions, especially with respect to Ks and Kd, seem to be proportional to each other, and the near—linear dependence of the columns in the Jacobian matrix may lead to ill-conditioned parameter estimation problem. Principal component analysis of the matrix STS is a powerful help in uncovering such parameter dependences. The approach will be discussed in Section 5.8.1. 

Principal component analysis of the normalized sensitivity matrix both concentrations observed... 

Practical identifiability is not the only problem that can be adressed by principal component analysis of the sensitivity matrix. In (refs. 29-30) several examples of model reduction based on this technique are discussed. 

Figure 3.4 Principal components analysis of a 6 x 3 matrix (a) the six samples in the original space of three measured variables (b) the new axes (principal components PCi and PC2) obtained from the SVD of the 6 x 3 matrix (c) representation of the six samples in the space of the principal components. Note how the three original variables are correlated (the higher Xi and X2 are, the higher is. Vj). Note also how by using only the coordinates (scores) of the samples on these two principal components, the relative position of the samples in the initial variable space is captured. This is possible because the original variables are correlated. Principal components regression (PCR) uses the scores on these two new variables (the two principal components) instead of the three originally measured variables.

With these patterns in mind, we conducted a principal components analysis of the two datasets using a covariance matrix, since some of the elements have especially high concentrations that could swamp those with lower concentrations in the analysis (Figure S). Here we can see that, in the plaza, samples from the north half vary by P concentration, while those of the south vary according to levels of Ba and Mg the reverse is true for western versus eastern samples (not pictured). In the patio, all samples tend to vary along Factor 1, in which Al, Ba, Fe, and Mn account for most of the variance in the data. This suggests that activity loci in the plaza and patio vary by comer or quadrant. 

Principal component analysis of the response matrix afforded one significant component (cross-validation) which described 82% of total variance in Y. As all responses are of the same kind (percentage yield) the data were not autoscaled prior to analysis. The response y1]L was deleted as it did not vary. The scores and loadings are also given in Table 14. The score values were used to fit a second-order... 

Statistical analyses. Three-way analyses of variance treating judges as a random effect were performed on each descriptive term using SAS Institute Inc. IMP 3.1 (Cary, North Carolina). Principal component analysis of the correlation matrix of the mean intensity ratings was performed with Varimax rotation. Over 200 GC peaks... 

For a long time the main topic of research in the area of sensitivity analysis was to find an accurate and effective method for the calculation of local concentration sensitivities. This question now seems to be settled, and the decoupled direct method (ddm) is generally considered the best numerical method. All the main combustion simulation packages such as CHEMKIN, LSENS, RUNIDL and FACSIMILE calculate sensitivities as well as the simulation results and, therefore, many publications contain sensitivity calculations. However, usually very little information is actually deduced from the sensitivity results. It is surprising that the application of principal component analysis is not widespread, since it is a simple postprocessing method which can be used to extract a lot of information from the sensitivities about the structure of the kinetic mechanism. Also, methods for parameter estimation should always be preceded by the principal component analysis of the concentration sensitivity matrix. 

The method of the principal component analysis of the rate sensitivity matrix with a previous preselection of necessary species is a relatively simple and effective way for finding a subset of a large reaction mechanism that produces very similar simulation results for the important concentration profiles and reaction features. This method has an advantage over concentration sensitivity methods, in that the log-normalized rate sensitivity matrix depends algebraically on reaction rates and can be easily computed. For large mechanisms this could provide considerable time savings for the reduction process. This method has been applied for mechanism reduction to several reaction schemes [96-102]. 

From the redundant species analysis it is clear that all reactions which consume H2O2 and O3 are redundant and can be removed automatically from the mechanism. In order to identify other redundant reactions the techniques of rate sensitivity analysis coupled with a principal component analysis of the resulting matrix can be used. The principal component analysis of the rate sensitivity matrix containing only the remaining important and necessary species will reveal the important reactions leading to reduced mechanisms applicable at various ambient temperatures. In principle it may be possible to produce a reduced scheme which models non-isothermal behaviour from analysis carried out on an isothermal model. An isothermal system is easier to model since thermodynamic and heat-transfer properties can be excluded from the calculations. However,... 

Proposed by Cramer, they are -> principal properties (i.e. significant components calculated by Principal Component Analysis) of a data matrix given by 6 physicochemical properties for 114 diverse liquid-state compounds [Cramer III, 1980a]. 

When there is more than one response variable to consider in a two-level screening experiment, it was shown in Chapter 17 that principal components analysis of the response matrix offers a means of identifying those experimental variables which are responsible for the systematic joint variation of the observed responses. This technique is useful when the reaction gives rise to several products and when the distribution of these product is of importance in the identification of suitable conditions for selectivity. 

Fig. 6-15 Principal component analysis of multidimensional, chemical-genetic data, (a) Eigenvalues and associated variance, and eigenvectors and associated factor scores computed from the data in Fig. 6-14(a). The matrix of eigenvectors...

---