Primary electroviscous effect coefficient

The intrinsic viscosity [17] in the above expression includes the primary electroviscous effect. The experimental data of Stone-Masui and Watillon (1968) for polymer latices seem to be consistent with the above equation (Hunter 1981). Corrections for a for large values of kRs are possible, and the above equation can be extended to larger Peclet numbers. However, because of the sensitivity of the coefficients to kRs and the complications introduced by multiparticle and cooperative effects, the theoretical formulations are difficult and the experimental measurements are uncertain. For our purpose here, the above outline is sufficient to illustrate how secondary electroviscous effects affect the viscosity of charged dispersions. 

In this chapter, we first present a theory of the primary electroviscous effect in a dilute suspension of soft particles, that is, particles covered with an ion-penetrable surface layer of charged or uncharged polymers. We derive expressions for the effective viscosity and the primary electroviscous coefficient of a dilute suspension of soft particles [26]. We then derive an expression for the effective viscosity of uncharged porous spheres (i.e., spherical soft particles with no particle core) [27]. 

The slopes of the different curves correspond to the fuU electrohydrodynamic effect, ( ) + ( ) pj, where the first term expresses the hydrodynamic effect, and the second is the consequence of the distortion of the electrical double layer that surrounds the particles. To determine this second term and, more exactly, the primary electroviscous coefficient, pi. 

Approximate results calculated via Eq. (27.57) are also shown as dotted lines in Fig. 27.2. It is seen that Ka > 100, the agreement with the exact result is excellent. The presence of a minimum of L Ka, la, alb) as a function of Ka can be explained qualitatively with the help of Eq. (27.57) as follows. That is, L Ka, la, alb) is proportional to 1/k at small Ka and to k at large Ka, leading to the presence of a minimum of L Ka, la, alb). As is seen in Fig. 27.3, for the case of a suspension of hard particles, the function L ko) decreases as Ka increases, exhibiting no minimum. This is the most remarkable difference between the effective viscosity of a suspension of soft particles and that for hard particles. It is to be noted that although L Ka, la, alb) increases with Ka at large Ka, the primary electroviscous coefficient p itself decreases with increasing electrolyte concentration. The reason is that the... 

---