Predictable case wave functions

There are a few cases where the rate of one reaction relative to another is needed, but the absolute rate is not required. One such example is predicting the regioselectivity of reactions. Relative rates can be predicted from a ratio of Arrhenius equations if the relative activation energies are known. Reasonably accurate relative activation energies can often be computed with HF wave functions using moderate-size basis sets. 

Until very recently, however, the same could not be said for reactive systems, which we define to be systems in which the nuclear wave function satisfies scattering boundary conditions. It was understood that, as in a bound system, the nuclear wave function of a reactive system must encircle the Cl if nontrivial GP effects are to appear in any observables [6]. Mead showed how to predict such effects in the special case that the encirclement is produced by the requirements of particle-exchange symmetry [14]. However, little was known about the effect of the GP when the encirclement is produced by reaction paths that loop around the CL... 

The reason for pursuing the reverse program is simply to condense the observed properties into some manageable format consistent with quantum theory. In favourable cases, the model Hamiltonian and wave functions can be used to reliably predict related properties which were not observed. For spectroscopic experiments, the properties that are available are the energies of many different wave functions. One is not so interested in the wave functions themselves, but in the eigenvalue spectrum of the fitted model Hamiltonian. On the other hand, diffraction experiments offer information about the density of a particular property in some coordinate space for one single wave function. In this case, the interest is not so much in the model Hamiltonian, but in the fitted wave function itself. 

For the present review we examined the e = 2 case using the PM3-SM4 ft-hexadecane model. This model is particularly appropriate because the PM3-CM1 dipole moments (3.4 and 1.2 D for formamide and formamidic acid, respectively) agree well with values obtained from MP2/6-31G wave functions (3.9 and 1.2 D, respectively) [235], The predicted differential free energy of... 

Problem 11-1. Consider three levels of approximation (a) Exact many-electron wave function, (b) Hartree-Fock wave function, (including all electrons), (c) Simple LCAO-MO valence electron wave function. For each of the following molecular properties, would you expect the Hartree-Fock approximation to give a correct prediction (to within 1% in the cases of quantitative predictions) Would you expect the LCAO-MO approximation to give a correct prediction ... 

In 1957, Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer published their theory of superconductivity, known as the BCS theory. It predicts that under certain conditions, the attraction between two conduction electrons due to a succession of phonon interactions can slightly exceed the repulsion that they exert directly on one another due to the Coulomb interaction of their like charges. The two electrons are thus weakly bound together forming a so-called Cooper pair. It is these Cooper pairs that are responsible for superconductivity. In conventional superconductors, these electrons are paired so that their spin and orbital angular momenta cancel. They are described by a wave function, known as an order parameter. In this case the order parameter has symmetry similar to that of the wave function of s electrons and represents a singlet state. 

The staggered rotamer is predicted to be more stable, in agreement with experiment for B2C14 but not for B2F4, but in the latter case the error in the barrier is only ca. 3 kJ, so it is possible that a more extended basis set would correct this. The wave functions were analysed in detail and used to interpret the photoelectron spectrum of B4C14. 

---