Precision graphic representation

The curve is a graphical representation of the Sabatier principle according to which the best catalysts are those adsorbing relevant species neither too weakly nor too strongly. Volcano curves are known also for catalytic reactions (on the other hand the principles are precisely the same), the only difference being that they are called Balandin curves. 

The treatment can be extended to reactions involving more than one adsorbed species provided that the number of additional parameters (i.e., Kb[B], Kr[R], etc.) can be reduced, preferably to one. An elegant method has been proposed by Roberts and Satterfield (1965, 1966) in which precisely this is accomplished all of the adsorption parameters are combined into a single parameter A>as- This method has been further generalized (Rajadhyaksha et al., 1976) by extending it to nonisothermal pellets, but graphical representation in this case becomes unwieldy because now two additional (thermal) parameters ag and must be accommodated. 

More precisely, is it possible to adapt the graphical representation mode of each variable according to the usage context of the latter ... 

Non-pharmaceutical applications tend to be aimed at accurate stmcture prediction together with properties such as electrostatic potential maps and surface hydrophobic-ity. One consequence of this is a desire for easily understood graphical representations of both the molecules and the calculated properties. An example of this can be seen in Figure 1, which shows a geometry-optimized computed structure of the potassium complex of the macrocycle 18-crown-6. A representation of the complex s electrostatic potential on a van der Waals surface is overlaid on top of this. A cutaway view is depicted so that the connectivity and identity of each atom can be seen clearly and correlated with the local electrostatics. In the example, blue represents an electropositive region, red is electronegative, and green is neutral. As the complex can be rotated on a computer screen, the structure can be considered to be pseudo three dimensional. The representation of physical properties adds a further dimension to this. Snapshots of molecules and associated properties, perhaps modeled at precise intervals... 

For structure-property and structure-activity studies, one should use solely structure invariants, and when structures are represented by molecular graphs, graph invariants could serve as structure descriptors. The mathematical term invariant means any quantity that is independent o/graphical representation of a molecule or adopted numbering of atoms. In other words, invariants represent intrinsic mathematical properties of molecular structure. They differ from the physicochemical molecular properties in that they are either obtained by counting or can be expressed with mathematical formulas and are always therefore numerically exact. The same can be said for quantum chemical molecular descriptors. In contrast, physicochemical molecular descriptors that are molecular properties are obtained by measuring, which may be sufficiently precise and thus numerically satisfactory nevertheless, with time, they may undergo some, even if minor, revisions. 

The corresponding graphical representation is shown in Figure 2, that is a superset of the Bayesian Network we will consider in this paper more precisely, we will not consider the third layer, i.e. the System of Systems functional model, that, for the moment, we consider a deterministic layer inside the framework. 

The development of quantum electrodynamics saw the introduction of diagrammatic techniques. In particular, Feynman [28], in a paper entitled Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics, introduced diagrams which provide not only a pictorial representation of microscopic processes, but also a precise graphical algebra which is entirely equivalent to other formulations. They have a simplicity and elegance which is not shared by, for example, purely algebraic methods. 

To define the structure of a molecule in a precise manner then, we must create a list (the order is not important) of atomic coordinates Xj, yj, Zj (and here the order is important). A molecular structure becomes a set of ordered triples Xj, yj, Zj, one for every atom. This is imminently suitable not only for translation into a visual representation, but for manipulation and analysis in a computer, and presentation on the screen of a computer graphics workstation in any number of manifestations. 

Note that all parameters are independent of phase geometry (i.e., planar vs. spherical domains), with only the exception of minor curvature effects in the x-depen-dence of ( ) (x). Thus, precise representation of the geometrical details becomes less important than one might initially believe, which is fortunate in view of the previously-discussed nonuniformity of microstructure within macroscopic samples. The graphical format of Fig. 9 will subsequently be used to express structural results inferred from fitting a mathematical model to rheological data. 

Each of these types of molecular surfaces is adequate for some applications. The van der Waals surface is widely used in graphic displays. However, for the representation of the solute cavity in a continuum model the Accessible and the Excluding molecular surfaces are the adequate models as long as they take into account solvent. The main relative difference between both molecular surface models appears when one considers the separation of two cavities in a continuum model and more precisely the cavitation contribution to the potential of mean force associated with this process (Figure 2.1.6). In fact, we have shown that only using the Excluding surface the correct shape of the potential of mean force is obtained. The cavitation term cannot be correctly represented by interactions among only one center by solvent molecule, such as the construction of the Accessible... 

---