Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential matrix element evaluation

Making first a comparison of the covalent energy, notice that in homopolar semiconductors, j becomes simply Wji j The various geometrical factors m the empty-core pseudopotential may be directly evaluated. Then, the pseudo-potential matrix element becomes... [Pg.529]

We add here one technical note about the matrix element evaluation. Evaluation of the kinetic energy involves the quantities alcos 0plj8) as for the four-body problem, these matrix elements can be related to overlap and potential-energy integrals. The line of reasoning that led to equation (42) yields the following formula for the three-body problem ... [Pg.145]

It is best to evaluate AV matrix-vector product by doing sums sequentially [101, 104-106], A potential matrix element in the contracted basis is rewritten... [Pg.146]

In modem quantum chemistry packages, one can obtain moleculai basis set at the optimized geometry, in which the wave functions of the molecular basis are expanded in terms of a set of orthogonal Gaussian basis set. Therefore, we need to derive efficient fomiulas for calculating the above-mentioned matrix elements, between Gaussian functions of the first and second derivatives of the Coulomb potential ternis, especially the second derivative term that is not available in quantum chemistry packages. Section TV is devoted to the evaluation of these matrix elements. [Pg.409]

In the work of King, Dupuis, and Rys [15,16], the mabix elements of the Coulomb interaction term in Gaussian basis set were evaluated by solving the differential equations satisfied by these matrix elements. Thus, the Coulomb matrix elements are expressed in the form of the Rys polynomials. The potential problem of this method is that to obtain the mabix elements of the higher derivatives of Coulomb interactions, we need to solve more complicated differential equations numerically. Great effort has to be taken to ensure that the differential equation solver can solve such differential equations stably, and to... [Pg.409]

In fact, the Coulomb integrals discussed in Section IV.C are available in contemporary quantum chemistry packages. We do not really need to develop our own method to calculate them. However, it is necessary to master the algebra so that we can calculate the matrix elements of the derivatives of the Coulomb potential. In the following, we shall demonstrate the evaluation of these matrix elements. [Pg.421]

Provided this problem is solved and the alloy wave function has become available, the matrix element can be evaluated straightforwardly, because the potential in it... [Pg.471]

One way in which we can solve the problem of propagating the wave function forward in time in the presence of the laser field is to utilize the above knowledge. In order to solve the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, we normally divide the time period into small time intervals. Within each of these intervals we assume that the electric field and the time-dependent interaction potential is constant. The matrix elements of the interaction potential in the basis of the zeroth-order eigenfunctions y i Vij = (t t T(e(t)) / ) are then evaluated and we can use an eigenvector routine to compute the eigenvectors, = S) ... [Pg.70]

It was shown above that the cubic term in the potential function for the anharmonic oscillator cannot, for reasons of symmetry, contribute to a first-order perturbation. However, if the matrix elements of = ax3 are evaluated, it is found that this term results in a second-order correction to the... [Pg.363]

The problem of evaluating the effect of the perturbation created by the ligands thus reduces to the solution of the secular determinant with matrix elements of the type rp[ lICT (pk, where rpj) and cpk) identify the eigenfunctions of the free ion. Since cpt) and cpk) are spherically symmetric, and can be expressed in terms of spherical harmonics, the potential is expanded in terms of spherical harmonics to fully exploit the symmetry of the system in evaluating these matrix elements. In detail, two different formalisms have been developed in the past to deal with the calculation of matrix elements of Equation 1.13 [2, 3]. Since t/CF is the sum of one-electron operators, while cpi) and cpk) are many-electron functions, both the formalisms require decomposition of free ion terms in linear combinations of monoelectronic functions. [Pg.10]

The obstacle to simultaneous quantum chemistry and quantum nuclear dynamics is apparent in Eqs. (2.16a)-(2.16c). At each time step, the propagation of the complex coefficients, Eq. (2.11), requires the calculation of diagonal and off-diagonal matrix elements of the Hamiltonian. These matrix elements are to be calculated for each pair of nuclear basis functions. In the case of ab initio quantum dynamics, the potential energy surfaces are known only locally, and therefore the calculation of these matrix elements (even for a single pair of basis functions) poses a numerical difficulty, and severe approximations have to be made. These approximations are discussed in detail in Section II.D. In the case of analytic PESs it is sometimes possible to evaluate these multidimensional integrals analytically. In either case (analytic or ab initio) the matrix elements of the nuclear kinetic energy... [Pg.449]

Once the coefficients for the expansion of the exchange-correlation term have been evaluated, all matrix elements can be calculated analytically. The Obara and Saika [47] recursive scheme has been used for the evaluation of the one and the two electron integrals. The total energy is therefore expressed in terms of the fitting coefficients for the electronic density and the exchange-correlation potential. [Pg.187]

The problem of evaluating matrix elements of the interelectron repulsion part of the potential between many-electron molecular Sturmian basis functions has the degree of difficulty which is familiar in quantum chemistry. It is not more difficult than usual, but neither is it less difficult. Both in the present method and in the usual SCF-CI approach, the calculations refer to exponential-type orbitals, but for the purpose of calculating many-center Coulomb and exchange integrals, it is convenient to expand the ETO s in terms of a Cartesian Gaussian basis set. Work to implement this procedure is in progress in our laboratory. [Pg.219]


See other pages where Potential matrix element evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.284]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.219]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.170 , Pg.172 ]




SEARCH



Elemental potential

Matrix element

Matrix elements evaluation

Matrix potential

Potential evaluation

Potential matrix element

© 2024 chempedia.info