Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential averaged electron

You should remember the basic physical idea behind the HF model each electron experiences an average potential due to the other electrons (and of course the nuclei), so that the HF Hamiltonian operator contains within itself the averaged electron density due to the other electrons. In the LCAO version, we seek to expand the HF orbitals i/ in terms of a set of fixed basis functions X X2 > and write... [Pg.123]

Figure 5.18. Schematic representation of the density of states N(E) in the conduction band and of the definitions of work function d>, chemical potential of electrons p, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level p, surface potential x> Galvani (or inner) potential

Figure 5.18. Schematic representation of the density of states N(E) in the conduction band and of the definitions of work function d>, chemical potential of electrons p, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level p, surface potential x> Galvani (or inner) potential <p and Volta (or outer) potential T for the catalyst (W) and for the reference electrode (R). The measured potential difference Uwr is by definition the difference in Fermi levels <p, p and p are spatially uniform O and can vary locally on the metal sample surfaces and the T potentials vanish, on the average, for the (effective double layer covered) gas-exposed catalyst and reference electrode surfaces.32 Reprinted with permission from The Electrochemical Society.
The recent interest in the exploration of electrocatalytic phenomena from first principles can be traced to the early cluster calculations of Anderson [1990] and Anderson and Debnath [1983]. These studies considered the interaction of adsorbates with model metal clusters and related the potential to the electronegativity determined as the average of the ionization potential and electron affinity—quantities that are easily obtained from molecular orbital calculations. In some iterations of this model, changes in reaction chemistry induced by the electrochemical environment... [Pg.99]

In summary, the movement of a high-energy electron in a solid may be described by a set of three Equations (1), (4) and (6). From these equations we may conclude that for high-energy electron diffraction the problem of multiple elastic and inelastic scattering by a solid is entirely determined by two functions, i.e. (1) the Coulomb interaction potential averaged over the motion of the crystal particles (V(r)> and (2) the mixed dynamic form factor S(r, r, E) of inelastic excitations of the solid. [Pg.162]

The total electronic potential energy of a molecule depends on the averaged electronic charge density and the nonlocal charge-density susceptibility. The molecule is assumed to be in equilibrium with a radiation bath at temperature T, so that the probability distribution over electronic states is determined by the partition function at T. The electronic potential energy is given exactly by... [Pg.173]

Abstract. Calculations of the first-order shell corrections of the ionization potential, 6il, electron affinity, 5 A, electronegativity, ix, and chemical hardness. Sir] are performed for elements from B to Ca, using the previously described Strutinsky averaging procedure in the frame of the extended Kohn-Sham scheme. A good agreement with the experimental results is obtained, and the discrepancies appearing are discussed in terms of the approximations made. [Pg.159]

The relevant question regarding secondary IEs on acidity is the extent to which IEs affect the electronic distribution. How can an inductive effect be reconciled with the Born-Oppenheimer approximation Although the potential-energy function and the electronic wave function are independent of nuclear mass, an anharmonic potential leads to different vibrational wave functions for different masses. Averaging over the ground-state wave function leads to different positions for the nuclei and thus averaged electron densities that vary with isotope. This certainly leads to NMR isotope shifts (IEs on chemical shifts), because nuclear shielding is sensitive to electron density.16... [Pg.156]

Calculations of vibrational frequencies are never accurate enough to verify that the secondary IE arises entirely from zero-point energies. Therefore although they do confirm a role for zero-point energies, which was never at issue, they cannot exclude the possibility of an additional inductive effect arising from changes of the average electron distribution in an anharmonic potential. The question then is whether it is necessary to invoke anharmonicity to account for a part of these secondary IEs. [Pg.164]

This Hamiltonian is used usually only for the short-range part of Coulomb interaction. The long-range interactions can be better introduced through the self-consistent electrical potential Poisson equation with the average electron density. [Pg.257]

Fig. 1. The JT-p staircase for Jf in the vicinity of the integer N0. The values of the reactivity indices holding on the = N0 tread and the two adjacent risers are indicated. These values are independent of the location of the (p, /F) point on the tread or on the risers. Here, is the ensemble-average electron number and p is the chemical potential... Fig. 1. The JT-p staircase for Jf in the vicinity of the integer N0. The values of the reactivity indices holding on the = N0 tread and the two adjacent risers are indicated. These values are independent of the location of the (p, /F) point on the tread or on the risers. Here, is the ensemble-average electron number and p is the chemical potential...
The benchmark calculations of ionization potentials and electron affinities of the atoms and molecules in the G2 data set" calculated using the hybrid functional (B97) show that this functional is adequate. The average absolute deviation from experimental data amounts to 0.055 eV and 0.056 eV for ionization potential and electron affinity, respectively.51... [Pg.174]

The effectiveness of a given plasma-assisted surface treatment depends primarily on the nature of the feed gas, and on a number of externally controllable parameters pressure, power, gas flow rate, frequency of the electrical energy used to excite the discharge, reactor geometry, etc. These "external variables, in turn, affect the "internal" plasma parameters which control the overall processes, namely the electron density ne, the average electron energy , the electron energy distribution function f(E), and the plasma potential... [Pg.148]


See other pages where Potential averaged electron is mentioned: [Pg.265]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.140]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.307 ]




SEARCH



Electronic potentials

Potential average

© 2024 chempedia.info