Population analysis alternative

The subscripts i and j denote two nuclei one in the QM region and one in the MM region. The atomic charges for the MM atoms are obtained by any of the techniques commonly used in MM calculations. The atomic charges for the QM atoms can be obtained by a population analysis scheme. Alternatively, there might be a sum of interactions with the QM nuclear charges plus the interaction with the electron density, which is an integral over the electron density. 

An example of quantum mechanical schemes is the oldest and most widely used Mulliken population analysis [1], which simply divides the part of the electron density localized between two atoms, the overlap population that identifies a bond, equally between the two atoms of a bond. Alternatively, empirical methods to allocate atomic charges to directly bonded atoms in a reasonable way use appropriate rules which combine the atomic electronegativities with experimental structural information on the bonds linking the atoms of interest. A widely used approach included in many programs is the Gasteiger-Hiickel scheme [1]. 

Information about the possible structures of molybdate and its pro-tonated forms in solution has been obtained from molecular orbital calculations (62). By considering bond orders obtained from a Mulli-ken population analysis and the agreement between experimental and theoretical UV spectra it was concluded that [Mo04]2 and [HMoOt I are tetrahedral and that the neutral acid is octahedral. For the latter a somewhat distorted octahedral structure based on the formula Mo02(OH)2(H20)2 was proposed (62). The alternative structure Mo03(H20)3 was not taken into account in the calculations. 

As discussed earlier the charges of the QM atoms are derived by means of a population analysis, whereas the charges of the respective solvent model are used for all MM particles. The reaction field (28) formalism was employed in this equation to account for the error resulting from the Coulombic cutoff given as rc. e is the dielectric constant of the medium beyond the Coulombic cutoff. Alternatively, an Ewald summation technique (29) could be applied as well. 

An electron transfer-sensitive oln coordination alternative of substituted olefins to metal centers has been demonstrated [81] in the system [(NC)2C=C(CN)2W(CO)5]" (20) where the n complex with n = 0 (olefin coordination) changes reversibly to an ESR detectable a complex (nitrile coordination) after one-electron reduction ( = -1). Even in the absence of a detailed spin population analysis the low symmetry of the anionic complex is evident from at least three distinctly different N coupling constants in the ESR spectrum [81]. 

A condensed form of the MEP could be used, if we knew the net charge on each atom with certainty. But finding these charges, qk is a difficult, if not impossible, task since is is not well defined. The commonly used Mulliken population analysis has obvious deficiencies. Several dozen alternative methods, both theoretical and experimental, have been proposed.Density functional theory also offers a method, which has some advantages. 

In this respect it is worth mentioning that the Mulliken population analysis produces an alternative way of looking at chemical bond in terms of... 

Up until now we have discussed the general methods for computing the cluster wavefunctions we now consider how the wavefunctions can be analyzed to obtain insights into the nature of chemical interactions at surfaces. In the introduction, we pointed out that the most commonly used method of analysis is the Mulliken population analysis and that this method of analysis may give misleading results. One alternative to a population analysis to get information about the charge associated with a given atom is the orbital projection approach. Here, one takes an atomic or molecular orbital, projection operator, P(( ) = spin orbital. The expectation value of P(v>) taken with respect to the cluster wavefunction provides a measure of the extent to which

[Pg.2875]

In the previous section we noted that the result of an analysis is best expressed as a confidence interval. For example, a 95% confidence interval for the mean of five results gives the range in which we expect to find the mean for 95% of all samples of equal size, drawn from the same population. Alternatively, and in the absence of determinate errors, the 95% confidence interval indicates the range of values in which we expect to find the population s true mean. 

---