Polymers affective interactions

One factor which affects the extent of polymer-solvent interactions is relative molar mass of the solute. Therefore the point at which a molecule just ceases to be soluble varies with relative molar mass, which means that careful variation of the quality of the solvent can be used to fractionate a polymer into... 

Of course, many investigators have realised that changes in solvent may not only affect the x parameter, but also the effective polymer/surface interaction, expressed by the adsorption... 

In semi-crystalline polymers the interaction of the matrix and the tiller changes both the structure and the crystallinity of the interphase. The changes induced by the interaction in bulk properties are reflected by increased nucleation or by the formation of a transcrystalline layer on the surface of anisotropic particles [48]. The structure of the interphase, however, differs drastically from that of the matrix polymer [49,50]. Because of the preferred adsorption of large molecules, the dimensions of crystalline units can change, and usually decrease. Preferential adsorption of large molecules has also been proved by GPC measurements after separation of adsorbed and non-attached molecules of the matrix [49,50]. Decreased mobility of the chains affects also the kinetics of crystallization. Kinetic hindrance leads to the development of small, imperfect crystallites, forming a crystalline phase of low heat of fusion [51]. 

It has been found that the HNBR/SP nanocomposite provides the best thermal and mechanical properties when HNBR is dissolved in Ch and SP is dispersed in MEK. XRD, AFM,TEM, and optical transmittance studies show that the dispersion of clay is best in the Ch/MEK solvent combination and, hence, polymer-filler interaction is also highest in this system. Thus, rather than implying that the solvent selection directly affects the physical properties of the nanocomposite, solvent acts on the properties through its influence on the developed morphology. 

Figure 6 shows how the transition of poly(e-carbobenzoxy L-lysine) (PCBL) in m-cresol is affected by the chain length of the sample (23). The trend displayed here is general and conforms to the theoretical prediction deduced from Fig. 1 the transition curve becomes sharper as chain length increases. Comparison with Fig. 5 indicates that in the same solvent, m-cresol, the direction of transition of PCBL is opposite to that of PBLA and the two transitions differ markedly in sharpness. This again illustrates the crucial importance of polymer-solvent interactions in the transitions of polypeptides. 

The procedure used for testing the ideal Donnan theory is applicable to any model that decouples ionic effects from network elasticity and polymer/solvent interactions. Thus we require that nnet depend only on EWF and not C. While this assumption may seem natural, several models which include ionic effects do not make this assumption. For example, the state of ionization of a polymer chain in the gel and the ionic environment may affect the chain s persistence length, which in turn alters the network elasticity [26]. Similarly, a multivalent counterion can alter network elasticity by creating transient crosslinks. 

Polymer/solvent interactions may also be affected by ions. Salting in/salting out phenomena [20], as well as the alteration of gel water structure due to ionization of pendant groups [29], will affect the polymer/solvent interaction component of Ilnet. 

This concept also requires that there be no polymer — penetrant interaction to such an extent that significant polymer structural changes affecting s0 and/or K2 occur. Over the experimental gas pressure range normally used (p 0-20 atm), this appears to be so in the case of permanent gases, like N2 but not in the case of condensable gases, like C02. Two effects may be noted here ... 

Because of the strong polymer-solvent interaction, this relationship was markedly affected by electrolytes. 

Proton-accepting polymers and proton-donating polymers typically interact with each other in aqueous medium and organic solvents almost stoichiometri-cally. This complex formation is affected by temperature, polymer structure, polymer concentration, solvent and other interaction forces, e.g. hydrophobic interactions. In general, the ratio [proton-accepting polymer units]/[proton-donating polymer units] in mol/1 of the complex is almost unity in dilute solu-... 

---