Polarisation resistance method

Polarisation-resistance method The polarisation-resistance method (see Section 20.1) has been used for determining corrosion rates of metals buried underground. 

The Schwerdtfeger polarisation break and the polarisation resistance methods have been studied by Jones and Lowe " in relation to their effectiveness in evaluating corrosion rates of buried metals. A Holler bridge circuit was used to remove IR contributions during the measurement of the polarised potential. Jones and Lowe, on the basis of their studies of buried steel and aluminium specimens, concluded that the polarisation resistance was the most useful, and that the polarisation break had the serious limitation that it was difficult to identify the breaks in the curve. 

Danielson, M. J., Analysis of Errors in Using The Two Electrode and Three Electrode Polarisation Resistance Methods In Measuring Corrosion Rates , Corrosion, 36, No. 4, 174-178, April (1980)... 

Stern and Weisert " by taking arbitrary values of the Tafel constants showed that corrosion rates determined by the polarisation resistance techniques are in good agreement with corrosion rates obtained by mass loss methods. 

The importance of the method in corrosion testing and research has stimulated other work, and since Stern s papers appeared there have been a number of publications many of which question the validity of the concept of linear polarisation. The derivation of linearity polarisation is based on an approximation involving the difference of two exponential terms, and a number of papers have appeared that have attempted to define the range of validity of polarisation resistance measurements. Barnartt" derived an analytical expression for the deviations from linearity and concluded that it varied widely between different systems. Leroy", using mathematical and graphical methods, concluded that linearity was sufficient for the technique to be valid in many practical corrosion systems. Most authors emphasise the importance of making polarisation resistance measurements at both positive and negative overpotentials. 

The controversy that arises owing to the uncertainty of the exact values of and b and their variation with environmental conditions, partial control of the anodic reaction by transport, etc. may be avoided by substituting an empirical constant for (b + b /b b ) in equation 19.1, which is evaluated by the conventional mass-loss method. This approach has been used by Makrides who monitors the polarisation resistance continuously, and then uses a single mass-loss determination at the end of the test to obtain the constant. Once the constant has been determined it can be used throughout the tests, providing that there is no significant change in the nature of the solution that would lead to markedly different values of the Tafel constants. 

Mansfeld points out that a major limitation of the polarisation resistance is that the factor b b /2-3(b + b ) must be determined in order to evaluate, and has devised a procedure in which this can be achieved by a graphical method. 

Polarisation methods involve changing the potential of the WE and monitoring the current which is produced as a function of time or potential. One of the most relevant physical quantities measured by DC polarisation methods is linear polarisation resistance (LPR). Its definition is based on the mixed potential theory proposed by Wagner and Traud [4], that explains the corrosion reactions by assuming that cathodic and anodic partial reactions occur at the metal-electrolyte interface at a certain corrosion (or mixed ) potential,... 

When establishing a method for determining redox kinetics, one can consider using the value of the slope of the current-potential curve for the open-circuit potential. However, it is impossible to assign a specific slope value to a fast couple because this slope is highly dependent on the limiting anodic and cathodic currents. To approach this issue from a quantitative point of view, one can start from the expression of the polarisation resistance around the equilibrium potential (see section 4.3.3.4). 

Where, W is weight loss (mg), A is area of the specimen (cm ), D is density of the specimen (gm/cm ), T is exposure time (hours) and unit pm/year is micro-metre/year. Indirect methods of corrosion rate measurement involve anodic/ cathodic reaction, consideration of current potential relationship or polarisation resistance values. Tafel extrapolation method is the most popular laboratory methods for measuring corrosion rate of a metal from electrochemical data in a corrosive medium. 

Polarisation Test Method. This method is used to determine the corrosion rate. Polarisation resistance (Rp) is the resistance of specimen to oxidation during the application of an external potential in DC corrosion measurement methods. The CR and /corr are related to Rp and can be calculated from equation given below and polarisation resistance is related to Ton according to Stem Geary relation [106]. 

Combination electrical methods Tomashov and Mikhailovsky describe a method developed in the Soviet Union. This test is essentially a combination of resistivity measurement and polarisation rates on iron electrodes in soil in situ. The usefulness and value of this procedure has not as yet been determined by practical application by corrosion engineers. The development of this combination test does, however, represent an attempt to integrate some of the complex factors controlling corrosion rates in soil. Much more research on these factors and methods of measurement should in the future enable the corrosion engineer to evaluate soil properties with respect to application of corrosion-alleviating operations. 

It has frequently been suggested that during d.c. measurements the specimens become polarised, consequently a.c. current should be used. A comparison of d.c. and a.c. methods has been made and it was found that at a frequency of 1 592 Hz, and over the range 0-2-20 kHz the values of the resistances were always lower when a.c. was used . 

Inhibitor control can be effected by conventional methods of chemical analysis, inspection of test specimens or by instrumentation. The application of instrumental methods is becoming of increasing importance particularly for large systems. The techniques are based on the linear (resistance) polarisation method and the use of electrical resistance probes. They have the advantage that readings from widely separated areas of the plant can be brought together at a central control point. (See Section 18.1.)... 

Some investigatorshave advocated a type of accelerated test in which the specimens are coupled in turn to a noble metal such as platinum in the corrosive environment and the currents generated in these galvanic couples are used as a measure of the relative corrosion resistance of the metals studied. This method has the defects of other electrolytic means of stimulating anodic corrosion, and, in addition, there is a further distortion of the normal corrosion reactions and processes by reason of the differences between the cathodic polarisation characteristics of the noble metal used as an artificial cathode and those of the cathodic surfaces of the metal in question when it is corroding normally. 

The determination of polarisation curves of metals by means of constant potential devices has contributed greatly to the knowledge of corrosion processes and passivity. In addition to the use of the potentiostat in studying a variety of mechanisms involved in corrosion and passivity, it has been applied to alloy development, since it is an important tool in the accelerated testing of corrosion resistance. Dissolution under controlled potentials can also be a precise method for metallographic etching or in studies of the selective corrosion of various phases. The technique can be used for establishing optimum conditions of anodic and cathodic protection. Two of the more recent papers have touched on limitations in its application and differences between potentiostatic tests and exposure to chemical solutions. ... 

---