Pilot plants automation

Childs, W. V. and Vickery, E. H., "The Phillips Small Sample Octane Number Methods, Automation of a Knock-Test Engine, Symposium on Laboratory and Pilot Plant Automation, Washington, DC, August 28-September 2, 1983, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1983, pp. 979-990. 

The development section serves as an intermediary between laboratory and industrial scale and operates the pilot plant. A dkect transfer from the laboratory to industrial-scale processes is stiH practiced at some small fine chemicals manufacturers, but is not recommended because of the inherent safety, environmental, and economic risks. Both equipment and plant layout of the pilot plant mirror those of an industrial multipurpose plant, except for the size (typically 100 to 2500 L) of reaction vessels and the degree of process automation. 

Table 3. Typical Classes of Pilot Plants by Degree of Automation ...

The requirements on the measure-, control- and safety installations are described in Sections 2.2.8 and 2.4. The degree of automation of pilot plants will depend on the expected operation conditions. However it is recommended to automate the BTM and DR measurements, this being far more accurate and less tedious than hand operation and visual reading. 

The RC1 is an automated laboratory batch/semi-batch reactor for calorimetric studies which has proven precision. The calorimetric principle used and the physical design of the system are sound. The application of the RC1 extends from process safety assessments including calorimetric measurements, to chemical research, to process development, and to optimization. The ability of the RC1 to generate accurate and reproducible data under simulated plant scale operating conditions may result in considerably reduced testing time and fewer small scale pilot plant runs. 

Virtually all new pilot plants will be computer controlled and heavily automated due to the high cost of operating labor, need for high accuracy and repeatability, and ease of data gathering and work-up. Stand-alone computer and programmable logic controller systems will continue to dominate the... 

In this second, completely revised edition, process and plant automation are introduced in a separate section and methods to transfer pilot plant qualifications and process data to production arc presented. The guidelines for process and plant evaluation and qualifications have been updated and enlarged. Trouble shooting is concentrated in a section of its own and literature has been updated with 1(H) new quotations to include references as recent as 2002. and 100 new tables and figures have been added. 

The pilot plant is composed of 8 columns of 33 mm of internal diameter connected in series. Six automated valves are placed after each column in order to connect the columns to the different inlets and outlets of the process (See figure 3). Analogical valves are located after each column (Un) and are used to control the pressures in the different zones of the process. Five analogical valves control inlets and outlets flowrates. 

Bequette, B. W., Holihan, S., and Bacher, S. (2004), Automation and control issues in the design of a pharmaceutical pilot plant, Control Eng. Practice, 12, 901-908. 

Fig. 2 Encapsulation equipment useful for clinical supply manufacture in the pilot plant. (A) Manual encapsulation equipment (Dott. Bonapace C., Milano, Italy). (B) Semiautomated encapsulation equipment (Elanco Qualicaps, Indianapolis). (C) Automated encapsulation equipment (MG America, Inc., Fairfield, NJ).

The microactivity test (MAT) based on the ASTM-D-3907 [11] standard was used to determine activity and product selectivity of catalysts. MAT runs were performed in a X)Uel automated equipment with 4.0 g of catalyst using the same VGO as in the pilot plant runs. Unless otherwise specified catalyst samples were previously calcined at 853 K for three hours. Operating conditions were 793 K, CTO ratio of 4, 75 s injection time and WHSV of 15.7 h. Product analysis and conversion and selectivity calculations were done as in the pilot plant. The relative error of data was 5%. We analyzed coke bum products in-situ by IR analysis using an HORIBA VIA-510 analyzer. Product distribution was expressed in terms of produet yield/ activity ratio as defined in Table 2 as currently used for interpreting MAT numbers in equilibrium catalysts. 

Pilot plants can be classified in a number of ways with the most common being by size, purpose, or degree of automation. The different classifications are summarized in Tables 1-3. Classifications are merely indications of general properties of the units most are so unique that each one is truly one of a kind. ... 

Large scale pilot plant Usually highly automated ... 

Pilot Plant and Minipilot Units Table 3 Classification by extent of automation 2149... 

Older systems, which used a mixture of manual operations, local controllers and computers, are now very rare. They represented a common step in the progress of automating pilot plants but, in general, have given way to either simpler units, which remain manual, or use local controllers and more complex systems, which are automated. 

---