Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Photon calculation

Another type of Chi interfacial layer employed on a metal electrode was a film consisting of ordered molecules. Villar (79) studied short circuit cathodic photocurrents at multilayers of Chi a and b built up on semi-transparent platinum electrodes in an electrolyte consisting of 96% glycerol and 4% KCl-saturated aqueous solution. Photocurrent quantum efficiencies of multilayers and of amorphous films prepared by solvent evaporation were compared. The highest efficiency (about 10 electrons/ absorbed photon, calculated from the paper) was obtained with Chi a multilayers, and the amorphous films of Chi a proved to be less efficient than Chi b multilayers. [Pg.243]

Petoussi, N., ZaukI, M., Panzer, W., Drexler, G. and Nette, P., Photon spectra in standard dosimetric or imaging photons calculated with Monte Carlo methods. Radiation Prot. Dosim., 43 (1992) 147. [Pg.304]

The phase factor in Eq. 22 leads to significant complications for the two-photon calculation, as that factor leads to a cut in the complex E plane. This factor is in general complex, and while we are interested in the real... [Pg.482]

The most accurate calculations of the self-energy have been carried out in the point-nucleus Coulomb case by Mohr and collaborators [28]. Techniques that work for the general, non-Coulomb case have also been developed [29], and it is now possible to carry out a complete one-photon calculation for any potential with relative ease. We present the overall effect of the one-photon diagrams on the 2p3/2 — 2si/2 splitting in the second row of Table 1, and give a breakdown for the individual states in Tables 2 and 3. [Pg.483]

The position of an electron moving in one dimension is determined to an accuracy of 0.01 nm by reflection of a photon. Calculate the simultaneous uncertainty in the velodty of the electron at the moment of localization. [Pg.46]

Leo WR (1987) Techniques for nuclear and particle physics experiments. Springer, Berlin, pp 75-106 Lux J, Koblinger L (1991) Monte Carlo particle transportation methods neutron and photon calculations. CRC Press, Boston... [Pg.455]

R.T. Santoro, V.C. Baker, and J.M. Barnes, Neutronics and Photonics Calculations for the Tokamak Experimental Power Reactor, Report No. ORNL/TM-5466, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (1977). [Pg.151]

R. J. HOWERTON, C. P. ALTAMIRANO, R. J. DOYAS, and S. T. PERKINS, Semi-Empirical Neutron Cross Section Information, Part of "An Integrated S y s t e m for Production of Neutronics and Photonics Calculational Constants, UCRL-30400, Lawrence Relation Laboratory,. Livernjore, Vol. IV, to be publish. ... [Pg.289]

Figure 13.8 The thickness of germanium required to absorb 99.5 % of a normally incident beam of photons (calculation based on data in Debertin and Helmer (1988))... Figure 13.8 The thickness of germanium required to absorb 99.5 % of a normally incident beam of photons (calculation based on data in Debertin and Helmer (1988))...
Small metal clusters are also of interest because of their importance in catalysis. Despite the fact that small clusters should consist of mostly surface atoms, measurement of the photon ionization threshold for Hg clusters suggest that a transition from van der Waals to metallic properties occurs in the range of 20-70 atoms per cluster [88] and near-bulk magnetic properties are expected for Ni, Pd, and Pt clusters of only 13 atoms [89] Theoretical calculations on Sin and other semiconductors predict that the stmcture reflects the bulk lattice for 1000 atoms but the bulk electronic wave functions are not obtained [90]. Bartell and co-workers [91] study beams of molecular clusters with electron dirfraction and molecular dynamics simulations and find new phases not observed in the bulk. Bulk models appear to be valid for their clusters of several thousand atoms (see Section IX-3). [Pg.270]

The second-order nonlinear optical processes of SHG and SFG are described correspondingly by second-order perturbation theory. In this case, two photons at the drivmg frequency or frequencies are destroyed and a photon at the SH or SF is created. This is accomplished tlnough a succession of tlnee real or virtual transitions, as shown in figure Bl.5.4. These transitions start from an occupied initial energy eigenstate g), pass tlnough intennediate states n ) and n) and return to the initial state g). A fiill calculation of the second-order response for the case of SFG yields [37]... [Pg.1274]

Here t. is the intrinsic lifetime of tire excitation residing on molecule (i.e. tire fluorescence lifetime one would observe for tire isolated molecule), is tire pairwise energy transfer rate and F. is tire rate of excitation of tire molecule by the external source (tire photon flux multiplied by tire absorjDtion cross section). The master equation system (C3.4.4) allows one to calculate tire complete dynamics of energy migration between all molecules in an ensemble, but tire computation can become quite complicated if tire number of molecules is large. Moreover, it is commonly tire case that tire ensemble contains molecules of two, tliree or more spectral types, and experimentally it is practically impossible to distinguish tire contributions of individual molecules from each spectral pool. [Pg.3020]

Another related issue is the computation of the intensities of the peaks in the spectrum. Peak intensities depend on the probability that a particular wavelength photon will be absorbed or Raman-scattered. These probabilities can be computed from the wave function by computing the transition dipole moments. This gives relative peak intensities since the calculation does not include the density of the substance. Some types of transitions turn out to have a zero probability due to the molecules symmetry or the spin of the electrons. This is where spectroscopic selection rules come from. Ah initio methods are the preferred way of computing intensities. Although intensities can be computed using semiempirical methods, they tend to give rather poor accuracy results for many chemical systems. [Pg.95]

These data are typical of lasers and the sorts of samples examined. The actual numbers are not crucial, but they show how the stated energy in a laser can be interpreted as resultant heating in a solid sample. The resulting calculated temperature reached by the sample is certainly too large because of several factors, such as conductivity in the sample, much less than I00% efficiency in converting absorbed photon energy into kinetic energy of ablation, and much less than 100% efficiency in the actual numbers of photons absorbed by the sample from the beam. If the overall efficiency is 1-2%, the ablation temperature becomes about 4000 K. [Pg.111]

This model is based on the calculation of probability p of x-ray photon impact on the j-kind particle, referred to fixed size class ... [Pg.113]

Si 2p line, at about 100 eV BE, is also easily accessible at most synchrotron sources but cannot, of course, be observed using He I and He II radiation. On the other hand, the Zn 3d and Hg 4f lines can be observed quite readily by He I radiation (see Table 1) and the elements identified in this way. Quantitative analysis using relative peak intensities is performed exactly as in XPS, but the photoionization cross sections a are very different at UPS photon energies, compared to A1 Ka energies, and tabulated or calculated values are not so readily available. Quantitation, therefore, usually has to be done using local standards. [Pg.305]

Fig. 4.4. Penetration depth z ofX-rays striking silicon at a variable glancing angle d>i. The curves were calculated for three different photon energies. The dashed vertical line signifies the respective critical angle [4.21],... Fig. 4.4. Penetration depth z ofX-rays striking silicon at a variable glancing angle d>i. The curves were calculated for three different photon energies. The dashed vertical line signifies the respective critical angle [4.21],...
The frequency of the electromagnetic radiation that can be absorbed by the nuclear system is easily calculated by equating the energy of a photon and the energy level separation ... [Pg.154]


See other pages where Photon calculation is mentioned: [Pg.490]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.1274]    [Pg.1792]    [Pg.2205]    [Pg.2214]    [Pg.2754]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.210]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.47 ]




SEARCH



Photon operators calculations

Photonic Local Density-of-States Calculation

Photons calculating energy

© 2024 chempedia.info