Perturbation theory Slater determinant

The amplitude for the so-ealled referenee CSF used in the SCF proeess is taken as unity and the other CSFs amplitudes are determined, relative to this one, by Rayleigh-Sehrodinger perturbation theory using the full N-eleetron Hamiltonian minus the sum of Foek operators H-H as the perturbation. The Slater-Condon rules are used for evaluating matrix elements of (H-H ) among these CSFs. The essential features of the MPPT/MBPT approaeh are deseribed in the following artieles J. A. Pople, R. Krishnan, H. B. Sehlegel, and J. S. Binkley, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 545 (1978) R. J. Bartlett and D. M. Silver, J. Chem. Phys. 3258 (1975) R. Krishnan and J. A. Pople, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 

There are three main methods for calculating electron correlation Configuration Interaction (Cl), Many Body Perturbation Theory (MBPT) and Coupled Cluster (CC). A word of caution before we describe these methods in more details. The Slater determinants are composed of spin-MOs, but since the Hamilton operator is independent of spin, the spin dependence can be factored out. Furthermore, to facilitate notation, it is often assumed that the HF determinant is of the RHF type. Finally, many of the expressions below involve double summations over identical sets of functions. To ensure only the unique terms are included, one of the summation indices must be restricted. Alternatively, both indices can be allowed to run over all values, and the overcounting corrected by a factor of 1/2. Various combinations of these assumptions result in final expressions which differ by factors of 1 /2, 1/4 etc. from those given here. In the present book the MOs are always spin-MOs, and conversion of a restricted summation to an unrestricted is always noted explicitly. 

In developing perturbation theory it was assumed that the solutions to the unpermrbed problem formed a complete set. This is general means that there must be an infinite number of functions, which is impossible in actual calculations. The lowest energy solution to the unperturbed problem is the HF wave function, additional higher energy solutions are excited Slater determinants, analogously to the Cl method. When a finite basis set is employed it is only possible to generate a finite number of excited determinants. The expansion of the many-electron wave function is therefore truncated. 

The difference between the Hartree-Fock energy and the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation (Figure 60), the so-called correlation energy, can be calculated approximately within the Hartree-Fock theory by the configuration interaction method (Cl) or by a perturbation theoretical approach (Mpller-Plesset perturbation calculation wth order, MPn). Within a Cl calculation the wave function is composed of a linear combination of different Slater determinants. Excited-state Slater determinants are then generated by exciting electrons from the filled SCF orbitals to the virtual ones ... 

The last important contribution to intermolecular energies that will be mentioned here, the dispersion energy (dEnis). is not accessible in H. F. calculations. In our simplified picture of second-order effects in the perturbation theory (Fig. 2), d mS was obtained by correlated double excitations in both subsystems A and B, for which a variational wave function consisting of a single Slater determinant cannot account. An empirical estimate of the dispersion energy in Li+...OH2 based upon the well-known London formula (see e.g. 107)) gave a... 

The particle-hole formalism has been introduced as a simplihcation of many-body perturbation theory for closed-shell states, for which a single Slater determinant dominates and is hence privileged. One uses the labels i,j, k,... for spin orbitals occupied in <1> and a,b,c,... for spin orbitals unoccupied virtual) in . 

Another class of methods uses more than one Slater determinant as the reference wave function. The methods used to describe electron correlation within these calculations are similar in some ways to the methods listed above. These methods include multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF), multireference single and double configuration interaction (MRDCI), and /V-clcctron valence state perturbation theory (NEVPT) methods.5... 

If is predominantly one Slater determinant, the coefficients C may be found by many-body-perturbation theory (29). This theory provides an elegant scheme for simplifying the perturbation formulas by combining terms referring to the same 1 integrals. 

Some qualitative understanding of the CICD can be gained by means of Wentzel-type theory that treats the initial and final states of the decay as single Slater determinants taking electronic repulsion responsible for the transitions as a perturbation. The collective decay of two inner-shell vacancies (see Figure 6.6) is a three-electron transition mediated by two-electron interaction. Thus, the process is forbidden in the first-order perturbation theory, and its rate cannot be calculated by the first-order expressions, such as (1). Going to the second-order perturbation theory, the expression for the collective decay width can be written as... 

Instead, practical methods involve a subset of possible Slater determinants, especially those in which two electrons are moved from the orbitals they occupy in the HF wavefunction into empty orbitals. These doubly excited determinants provide a description of the physical effect missing in HF theory, correlation between the motions of different electrons. Single and triple excitations are also included in some correlated ab initio methods. Different methods use different techniques to decide which determinants to include, and all these methods are computationally more expensive than HF theory, in some cases considerably more. Single-reference correlated methods start from the HF wavefunction and include various excited determinants. Important methods in inorganic chemistry include Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), coupled cluster theory with single and double excitations (CCSD), and a modified form of CCSD that also accounts approximately for triple excitations, CCSD(T). 

LFT originated as a purely electrostatic model - crystal-field theory (CFT) [18], in which d-electronic multiplets of transition metals are perturbed by ligands as point charges or point dipoles. The CF operator (Equation 1) acts within the space of Slater determinants (SD) composed of purely d-spin-orbitals in which two-electron energies are taken into account with the Coulomb operator and one-electron energies with a crystal-field potential (vcp), the first and second terms in Equation 1, respectively. 

X are replaced by the corresponding lowest-order Slater determinants, this expression can be shown to reproduce the result (85). Here, however, we evaluate the contributions from the states with valence principle quantum numbers n = 6 9 using our all-order wave functions the remaining contributions are estimated using perturbation theory. We find [40] ... 

---