Peak heat release rate polymer nanocomposites

The impact of the nanocomposite technology on polymers is huge, reflected in enhanced properties of the resulting PNs, such as enhanced mechanical, barrier, solvent-resistant, and ablation properties.12 The effect of nanocomposite technology on the thermal and fire performance of the polymers is primarily observed in two important parameters of the polymers (1) the onset temperature (7( ,nsct) in the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve—representative of the thermal stability of the polymer, and (2) the peak heat release rate (peak HRR) in cone calorimetric analysis (CCA)—a reflection of the combustion behavior (the flammability) of the polymer. The Tonset will be increased and the peak HRR will be reduced for a variety of polymers when nanoscale dispersion of the nanoadditive is achieved in the polymer matrix. 

Nanocomposites refer to the combination of nanosized fillers (10 m diameter) with polymers, rather than the combination of polymer matrix (filled with nanoparticles) and fiber reinforcement The most popular fillers used as fire retardants are layered silicates. Loading of 10% or less (by weight) of such fillers significantly reduces peak heat release rates and facilitates greater char production [7]. The char layer provides a shielding effect for the composites below and the creation of char also reduces the toxicity of the combustion products, as less carbon is available to form the CO and CO2. 

The accumulation of clay at the surface acts thus as a barrier which limits heat transfers and reduces the release of combustible volatiles into the flame. A substantial decrease in the peak heat release rate of the nanocomposite (25 to 50%) can be achieved compared to the neat polymer (Bourbigot et al, 2006). However, this effect is very dependent on the quality of dispersion of the nanoparticles within the host matrix, and a high degree of exfoliation is usually targeted in order to maximize both the mechanical and fire properties (Hackman and Hollaway, 2006). Other types of nanoparticles, such as silica (Si02), titanium dioxide (Ti02), carbon nanotubes or silesquioxane, have also proven to have significant flame-retardant properties (Laoutid et al., 2009). 

The great improvements in flame retardancy caused by the organoclays also opened the possibility of decreasing the level of ATH within the EVA polymer matrix. The content of ATH needed to maintain 200 kW/m as a peak heat release rate could be decreased from 65 to 45 wt% by the presence of only 5 wt% organoclays within the EVA polymer matrix. Reduction in the total amount of these fillers resulted in improved mechanical and rheological properties of the EVA-based nanocomposite. 

In summary, significant reduction in the peak heat release rate for the PA 6/clay nanocomposites was achieved by the formation of protective floccules on the polymer surface, which shielded the PA 6 from external thermal radiation and feedback from the flame. That is, the carbonaceous floccules acted as thermal insulation. 

In addition, several studies have reported the use of conventional ATH in combination with other types of nanofillers, particularly organoclays, to improve the FR properties of polymer nanocomposites [12, 13]. Organoclays are not considered as FR despite their ability to decrease peak heat release rates of several polymers under firelike conditions... 

Similar results are also observed in PS nanocomposites [56], which were prepared by free radical polymerization of styrene monomers in the presence of ZnAl and MgAl LDHs intercalated with 4,4 -azobis(4-cyanopentanoate) anions (LDH-ACPA). An intercalated-exfoliated morphology is observed for the composites of ZnAl-ACPA, whereas MgAl-ACPA shows microcomposite formation. The cone calorimetry results show good correlation between the reduction in PHRR and dispersion, in which the reduction in the peak heat release rate for 10% ZnAl-ACPA is 35% relative to the pristine polymer, whereas a 24% reduction is recorded for MgAl-ACPA at a similar loading. 

The observation that polymer-clay nanocomposites have significantly lower peak heat release rates (PHRRs) when compared to the pure polymer [47] stimulated a dramatic effort focused on the evaluation of the flame-retardant potential of clay dispersed in polymer. The decrease in PHRR can be related directly to the decrease in the spread of fire from one combustible material to another. This affect is directly applicable to definition (1) above. Figures 8.1 and 8.2 contain a comparison of cone calorimeter results for a pure polymer and a nanocomposite of that polymer with montmorillonite. 

---