Partnership relationships

Another useful approach is to attempt to get a broad review of the specification draft by operations, maintenance, and engineering. The specification must have an author who can write the basic document and who later edits the draft into the scope and language of the final specification. Single authorship, with committee review, is preferred over committee authorship. Only in rare instances is vendor participation in the specification authorship really justified, except in partnership relationships. 

Incredibly, as eminent a legal authority as Abe Fortas uses the expression, a bill of rights for psychiatry. In my opinion. he writes, the importance of the [Durham] decision cannot he judged hy a semantic exercise. Its importance is not due to the new standard that it established for adjudicating the defense of insanity. Durham is not a charter of liberty for the insane. Rather, as I shall show, its importance is that it is a charter, a bill of rights, for psychiatry and an offer of a limited partnership relationship between criminal law and psychiatry. (Abe Fortas, Implications of Durham s case, Amer. J. Psychiat., 113 577-588 [Jan.], 957 P- 579-)... 

Understand need for surveillance/monitoring of supplier capability, possibly part of a partnership relationship, and avoid repeat use of a supplier who does not deliver required compliance. 

Industrial applications of diamond have developed over the years as a result of developments by tool makers, machinery manufacturers and the advert of new materials. In addition, new diamond (and cBN) products have evolved, either as a result of technological advances in synthesis or in response to the requirements of a new application, and it is this multi-partnership relationship within the industry which has resulted in the dramatic growth and diversification since the early 1960s. 

Forging supply chain partnerships Relationships with suppliers and customers are arms length at best, antagonistic at worst. Collaboration up and down the supply chain is limited to transaction data. Efforts are limited to supplier initiatives focused on cost reduction, not revenue increases. Partners collaborate but roles are static. Partners pursue sphere strategies. Trading partners in the supply chain expand their value contributions. 

Foster reports that a Georgia Tech study recommends a search for the elusive partnership relationship. In these relationships, users will think of 3PLs as strategists and orchestrators of logistics activities. This requires a change, because the Georgia Tech survey reports that 79 percent of users currently view their 3PLs as mere resource providers. A second recommendation is for productive deal structures to motivate desired outcomes. 

Customers are one of the major values for any company. Hence, the basic objectives of supply chain management include the improvement of both external and internal customer service. To maintain and develop their relationships with purchasers, companies use different strategies. Some of them attempt to establish partnership relationships and trust, and to complete projects together with purchasers, while others set up exit barriers for customers or entrance barriers for competitors (Swiatowiec 2006, p. 139). 

Describe the key features of the market-based transactional relationship and the longer-term partnership relationship with suppliers . It is unlikely that any service business will benefit from engaging exclusively in one type of supplier relationship , discuss this in the context of hospital services supply chain. 

A key issue that prevents partnerships from enduring appears to be the gap between the strategic requirements of long-term partnerships and tactical-level manoeuvring - in particular, opportunism. It is a problem to resolve this, given that the dimensions that characterise close working relationships also provide both opportunity and increased incentive for opportunistic behaviour. This is caused when partners cannot easily obtain similar benefits outside the relationship and when specialised investments have been made. Buyers often assume that suppliers will take advantage if they become too important, and therefore act to prevent this. The consequences for the partnership relationship come second in their considerations. 

---