Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Partition coefficient pressure control

Figure 15. Variation in Dxh for garnet versns reciprocal temperature for experimental data sources listed in Table lb at a variety of pressures n = 33). A distinction is made between mantle solidus partition coefficients (Salters and Longhi 1999 Salters et al. 2002 McDade et al. 2003a,b) and the rest. Note the strong temperatnre dependence, which is qnalitatively similar to that incorporated in Equation (25b). The scatter is due to additional compositional controls. Figure 15. Variation in Dxh for garnet versns reciprocal temperature for experimental data sources listed in Table lb at a variety of pressures n = 33). A distinction is made between mantle solidus partition coefficients (Salters and Longhi 1999 Salters et al. 2002 McDade et al. 2003a,b) and the rest. Note the strong temperatnre dependence, which is qnalitatively similar to that incorporated in Equation (25b). The scatter is due to additional compositional controls.
Gas-liquid relationships, in the geochemical sense, should be considered liquid-solid-gas interactions in the subsurface. The subsurface gas phase is composed of a mixture of gases with various properties, usually found in the free pore spaces of the solid phase. Processes involved in the gas-liquid and gas-solid interface interactions are controlled by factors such as vapor pressure-volatilization, adsorption, solubility, pressure, and temperature. The solubility of a pure gas in a closed system containing water reaches an equilibrium concentration at a constant pressure and temperature. A gas-liquid equilibrium may be described by a partition coefficient, relative volatilization and Henry s law. [Pg.144]

From Fig. 19.3a-c, and as opposed to purely sorption controlled processes, it can be seen that during pervaporation both sorption and diffusion control the process performance because the membrane is a transport barrier. As a consequence, the flux 7i of solute i across the membrane is expressed as the product of both the sorption (partition) coefficient S, and the membrane diffusion coefficient Di, the so-called membrane permeability U, divided by the membrane thickness f and times the driving force, which maybe expressed as a gradient of partial pressures in place of chemical potentials [6] ... [Pg.430]

The exchange of chemical compounds from the gas phase to a surface, e.g. atmospheric particles, soil, water, vegetation or other surfaces, is controlled by the affinity of the compound to this surface. The ratio of vapour pressure to water solubility can be used as indicator between levels in the atmosphere and water surface (Henry s law H constant). In many model calculations, the ratio between POP levels in octanol and water, the octanol-water partitioning coefficient (Kow), is used as reference for the distribution of POP in organic material [14]. Consequently, the expression ///RT (Cair/Cwalcr) and Kow (Coctanoi/Cwater) provide the octanol-air partitioning coefficient (Koa) ... [Pg.84]

Mishra, D.S., Yalkowsky, S.H. (1991) Estimation of vapor pressure of some organic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 30,1609-1612. Miyake, K., Tereda, H. (1982) Determination of partition coefficients of very hydrophobic compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography on glyceryl-coated controlled-pore glass. J. Chromatogr. 240, 9-20. [Pg.559]

Temperature control may also be required to control the sensitivity of the coating to the analyte. Apart from the aforementioned temperature sensitivity of coating physical parameters, the partition coefficient between analyte in the ambient gas or liquid phase and that sorbed by the coating is typically exponentially dependent on absolute temperature. For simple physical interactions, such as an organic solvent being sorbed by a polymer film, the largest contribution to this effect is the strong temperature dependence of the solvent s vapor pressure. The sensitivity of the coated device is thus temperature dependent [34]. [Pg.377]

For simply producing the magnitude of observed excesses, both dynamic melting models and transport models are viable. The largest uncertainty in either type of model is the appropriate partition coefficients (and D as a function of pressure) as these control the inferences on the porosity through the parameter D (f>. The more stringent tests on these models, however, come from the observed correlations... [Pg.1756]

Predicting the environmental fate and movement of plasticizers is currently hampered by a lack of information. There is also a lack of monitoring data to assess nonpoint sources. The aqueous solubility - a fundamental environmental property - of two of the 23 plasticizers has not been determined. As noted in this chapter, many properties such as Henry s Law constants, vapor pressure, organic carbon-water partition coefficients, octanol-water partition coefficients, bioconcentration factors, and photooxidation rates in the atmosphere were estimated using stractural analog models, empirical relationships based on other chemicals. Both biodegradation and adsorption appear to be the major mechanisms that control the fate of plasticizers released into the environment. Despite the... [Pg.611]

Inspection of Eq. 6-14 reveals that we do not need to learn anything new to understand air-water equilibrium partitioning of neutral organic compounds. All we have to do is to recall how chemical structures (controlling intermolecular interactions) and environmental factors (e.g., temperature, presence of salts or organic cosolvents in the aqueous phase) affect the vapor pressure and the aqueous activity coefficient of a given compound. Hence, our discussion of air-water partitioning can be quite brief. [Pg.198]


See other pages where Partition coefficient pressure control is mentioned: [Pg.458]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.827]    [Pg.1395]    [Pg.1407]    [Pg.5060]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.47]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.107 ]




SEARCH



Controllability coefficient

Partitioning pressure

Pressure control

© 2024 chempedia.info