Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Parity effect

Figure 8. Measured tunnel splitting A as a function of transverse field for (a) several azimuth angles Figure 8. Measured tunnel splitting A as a function of transverse field for (a) several azimuth angles <pat m = 10 and (b) <p 0°, as well as for quantum transition between m = -10 and (10 - n). Note the parity effect that is analogous to the suppression of tunneling predicted for half-integer spins. It should also be mentioned that internal dipolar and hyperfine fields hinder a quench of A which is predicted for an isolated spin.
The calculated tunnel splittings for the states involved in the tunneling process at the resonances n = 0, 1, and 2 are reported in Fig. 9, showing the oscillations as well as the parity effect for odd resonances. [Pg.158]

In previous sections the FSS parameter was a discrete variable, the number of functions in a basis-set expansion. In this case the most accurate results were obtained by searching for crossing points of curves with minimum difference between the FSS parameters (in general, 1 or 2 for problems with parity effects). In the present case, the parameter R is a real variable. Therefore, the minimum difference between parameters is given by the limit A > 0. This limit introduces derivatives of the functions Er(l) and dER(k)/dX with respect to R. In practice the derivatives have to be calculated numerically, and then it is convenient to use a finite value of A, which is fixed by numerical stability studies. [Pg.69]

These four distinct, related symmetry classifications are (i) total parity (effect of crv on the complete electronic-vibration-rotation wavefunction) (ii) e//-symmetry (total parity of the complete wavefunction exclusive of a (—l)"7 or (—l)-7-1/2 rotational factor, respectively for molecules with an even or odd number of electrons) (Hi) the intrinsic even/odd symmetry under crv(xz) of the electronic wavefunction, exclusively for A = 0 states, E+ or E and (iv) the high-J (or case (b)) limiting behavior of the spatial coordinates of the electronic wavefunction under av xz) reflection in a plane that contains the internuclear... [Pg.139]

Additional support for this hypothesis was provided by the observation of an inverse "odd-even" or parity effect for the wettabilities of polar contacting liquids on the CF3-terminated films (see Figure 5). The parity effect has been observed in CH3-terminated monolayer films and arises from the dependence of the orientation of the terminal methyl groups upon the total number of carbon atoms in the adsorbates (i.e., the chain length) [39,40]. Films comprised of adsorbates with odd chain lengths (odd-numbered SAMs) have terminal methyl groups oriented more parallel with respect to the surface of gold than films comprised of adsorbates with even chain... [Pg.64]

W. Wernsdorfer and R. Sessoli, Quantum phase interference and parity effects in magnetic molecular clusters, Science, 284,133-135 [1999]. [Pg.574]

The Hamiltonian considered above, which connmites with E, involves the electromagnetic forces between the nuclei and electrons. However, there is another force between particles, the weak interaction force, that is not invariant to inversion. The weak charged current mteraction force is responsible for the beta decay of nuclei, and the related weak neutral current interaction force has an effect in atomic and molecular systems. If we include this force between the nuclei and electrons in the molecular Hamiltonian (as we should because of electroweak unification) then the Hamiltonian will not conuuiite with , and states of opposite parity will be mixed. However, the effect of the weak neutral current interaction force is mcredibly small (and it is a very short range force), although its effect has been detected in extremely precise experiments on atoms (see, for... [Pg.170]

We now consider planar molecules. The electronic wave function is expressed with respect to molecule-fixed axes, which we can take to be the abc principal axes of ineitia, namely, by taking the coordinates (x,y,z) in Figure 1 coincided with the principal axes a,b,c). In order to detemiine the parity of the molecule through inversions in SF, we first rotate all the electrons and nuclei by 180° about the c axis (which is peipendicular to the molecular plane) and then reflect all the electrons in the molecular ab plane. The net effect is the inversion of all particles in SF. The first step has no effect on both the electronic and nuclear molecule-fixed coordinates, and has no effect on the electronic wave functions. The second step is a reflection of electronic spatial coordinates in the molecular plane. Note that such a plane is a symmetry plane and the eigenvalues of the corresponding operator then detemiine the parity of the electronic wave function. [Pg.573]

According to Andreev and coworkers (Refs 26a 38) and Kaidymov (Ref 62) the decompn of solid PETN is much slower than that of molten PETN. They suggest that paritial melting occurs during decompn at temps below the PETN mp and this increases the decompn rate. The increase in the PETN decompn rate in the presence of TNT (observed by Urbanski et al, Ref 3) is claimed to be brought about similarly, ie, the PETN-TNT system forms low melting eutectics and PETN decompn proceeds, in effect, in a TNT soln (Ref 38)... [Pg.588]

Now look at octahedral complexes, or those with any other environment possessing a centre of symmetry e.g. square-planar). These present a further problem. The process of violating the parity rule is no longer available, for orbitals of different parity do not mix under a Hamiltonian for a centrosymmetric molecule. Here the nuclear arrangement requires the labelling of d functions as g and of p functions as m in centrosymmetric complexes, d orbitals do not mix with p orbitals. And yet d-d transitions are observed in octahedral chromophores. We must turn to another mechanism. Actually this mechanism is operative for all chromophores, whether centrosymmetric or not. As we shall see, however, it is less effective than that described above and so wasn t mentioned there. For centrosymmetric systems it s the only game in town. [Pg.66]

Crassous, J., Chardonnet, C., Saue, T. and Sdiwerdtfeger, P. (2005) Recent e q)erimental and theoretical developments towards the observation of parity violation (PV) effects in molecules by spectroscopy. Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 3, 2218—2224. [Pg.238]

Bast, R. and Sdiwerdtfeger, P. (2003) Parity Violation Effects in ihe C-F Stretching Mode of Heavy Atom Containing Methyl Fluorides. Physical Review Letters, 91, 23001-1—23001-3. [Pg.238]

These relations are the same as the parity rules obeyed by the second derivative of the second entropy, Eqs. (94) and (95). This effectively is the nonlinear version of Casimir s [24] generalization to the case of mixed parity of Onsager s reciprocal relation [10] for the linear transport coefficients, Eq. (55). The nonlinear result was also asserted by Grabert et al., (Eq. (2.5) of Ref. 25), following the assertion of Onsager s regression hypothesis with a state-dependent transport matrix. [Pg.34]

Parity nonconservation (PNC) effects, electric dipole moment search, 242 Parity operator ... [Pg.285]

What was the importance of this research result for the chirality problem One difficulty is provided by the fact that the interaction responsible for the violation of parity is in fact not so weak at all, although it only acts across a very short distance (smaller than an atomic radius). Thus, the weak interaction is not noticeable outside the atomic nucleus, except for p-decay. It would thus have either no influence on chemical reactions or only a very limited effect on chemical reactions, as these almost completely involve only interactions between the electron shells. [Pg.249]

The influence of the weak interaction on chemical reactions can be calculated since it favours left-handedness, it has an effect on the energy content of molecules and thus on their stability. In the case of the amino acids, the L-form would be more stable than the corresponding D-form to a very small extent. Theoretical calculations (using ab initio methods), in particular by Mason and Tranter (1983), indicated that the energy difference between two enantiomers due to the parity violation is close to 10 14J/mol (Buschmann et al., 2000). More recent evidence suggests that the... [Pg.249]


See other pages where Parity effect is mentioned: [Pg.224]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.443]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.184 , Pg.189 ]




SEARCH



Parity

© 2024 chempedia.info