Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pairing function, intermolecular

Sagarik, K. R, Ahlrichs, R., and Erode, S., Intermolecular potentials for ammonia based on the test particle model and the coupled pair functional method. Mol. Phys. 57, 1247-1264 (1986). [Pg.131]

Campbell, E. S., and Mezei, M., Use of a non-pair-additive intermolecular potential function to fit quantum-mechanical data on water molecule interactions, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 2338-2344 (1977). [Pg.287]

The pair functions can be further approximated by the AHS modeP or the more exact y (r) perturbation values. Usually simple sum rules are used to obtain the intermolecular potential between different species. However, the extrapolation of pure fluid theories directly to mixtures should be undertaken with caution as some features, such the unimportance of different well depths in the liquid, are not so certain in mixtures. Hence any deviations from the above model, for example, excess nonlinear concentration dependence of should not automatically be attributed to three-body effects. Only in isotopic or isopotential mixtures, which can be described very nearly as the pure fluid, could an unambiguous detection of ternary contributions to the concentration dependence be feasible. [Pg.312]

K. P. Sagarik, R. Ahlrichs, and S. Brode, Mol. Phys., 57, 1247 (1986). Intermolecular Potentials for Ammonia Based on the Test Particle Model and the Coupled Pair Functional Method. [Pg.217]

The intramolecular force-field for the state was determined by using the SCF gradient method. The intermolecular potential was taken as a sum of atom-atom pair functions with parameters obtained as a fit to ab initio data for the rare gas-formaldehyde system[66]. A total of 18 and Ilk basis functions were needed in the V7=0 and V7=l states respectively to obtain cross sections converged to within 10% or better. [Pg.317]

Figure 18. Intermolecular pairing function in the equimolar athermal stiffness blend. " Except as explicitly noted all curves are for the melt like packing fraction of 0.5. (a) Results for fixed aspect ratio asymmetry of y = rg/r = 1.49 and various values of N. (b) Dependence on aspect ratio asymmetry for fixed N= 100. From top to bottom the curves correspond to -y = 2.319 (spinodal boundary), 2.199, 1.979, 1.734, 1.343, and 1.219. Figure 18. Intermolecular pairing function in the equimolar athermal stiffness blend. " Except as explicitly noted all curves are for the melt like packing fraction of 0.5. (a) Results for fixed aspect ratio asymmetry of y = rg/r = 1.49 and various values of N. (b) Dependence on aspect ratio asymmetry for fixed N= 100. From top to bottom the curves correspond to -y = 2.319 (spinodal boundary), 2.199, 1.979, 1.734, 1.343, and 1.219.
A polymeric complication of all BGY approaches is the need for several different types of three-point correlation functions. For the purely in/ermolecular distribution function the standard Kirkwood superposition approximation is invoked, that is, a real space product of the three corresponding intermolecular pair functions. However, for the intramolecular triplet distribution functions (involving one, two, or three sites on the same polymer), there are many alternative schemes invoked by the different authors. These can be viewed as different closure approximations. Eu and Gan " have focused on analyzing the Kirkwood hierarchy based on Kirkwood-like and Markov-like approxi-... [Pg.129]

The semiempirical methods combine experimental data with theory as a way to circumvent the calculational difficulties of pure theory. The first of these methods leads to what are called London-Eyring-Polanyi (LEP) potential energy surfaces. Consider the triatomic ABC system. For any pair of atoms the energy as a function of intermolecular distance r is represented by the Morse equation, Eq. (5-16),... [Pg.196]

The ab initio methods used by most investigators include Hartree-Fock (FFF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) [6, 7]. An ab initio method typically uses one of many basis sets for the solution of a particular problem. These basis sets are discussed in considerable detail in references [1] and [8]. DFT is based on the proof that the ground state electronic energy is determined completely by the electron density [9]. Thus, there is a direct relationship between electron density and the energy of a system. DFT calculations are extremely popular, as they provide reliable molecular structures and are considerably faster than FFF methods where correlation corrections (MP2) are included. Although intermolecular interactions in ion-pairs are dominated by dispersion interactions, DFT (B3LYP) theory lacks this term [10-14]. FFowever, DFT theory is quite successful in representing molecular structure, which is usually a primary concern. [Pg.153]

Intermolecular potential functions have been fitted to various experimental data, such as second virial coefficients, viscosities, and sublimation energy. The use of data from dense systems involves the additional assumption of the additivity of pair interactions. The viscosity seems to be more sensitive to the shape of the potential than the second virial coefficient hence data from that source are particularly valuable. These questions are discussed in full by Hirschfelder, Curtiss, and Bird17 whose recommended potentials based primarily on viscosity data are given in the tables of this section. [Pg.70]

Figure 5. The Fourier transformed signal AS[r, i] of I2/CCI4. The pump-probe delay times are I = 200 ps, 1 ns, and 1 ps. The green bars indicate the bond lengths of iodine in the X and A/A states. The blue bars show the positions of the first two intermolecular peaks in the pair distribution function gci-ci- (See color insert.)... Figure 5. The Fourier transformed signal AS[r, i] of I2/CCI4. The pump-probe delay times are I = 200 ps, 1 ns, and 1 ps. The green bars indicate the bond lengths of iodine in the X and A/A states. The blue bars show the positions of the first two intermolecular peaks in the pair distribution function gci-ci- (See color insert.)...
The process proceeds through the reaction of pairs of functional groups which combine to yield the urethane interunit linkage. From the standpoint of both the mechanism and the structure type produced, inclusion of this example with the condensation class clearly is desirable. Later in this chapter other examples will be cited of polymers formed by processes which must be regarded as addition polymerizations, but which possess within the polymer chain recurrent functional groups susceptible to hydrolysis. This situation arises most frequently where a cyclic compound consisting of one or more structural units may be converted to a polymer which is nominally identical with one obtained by intermolecular condensation of a bifunctional monomer e.g., lactide may be converted to a linear polymer... [Pg.39]

To examine the significance of this approximation further, it should be noted that a highly branched condensation polymer molecule, such as the one shown in Fig. 61, retains many unreacted functional groups which offer a number of opportunities for reaction between pairs on the same molecule. That intramolecular reaction between them proceeds to an appreciable degree in competition with intermolecular condensa-... [Pg.348]

Fig. 4.7. Intermolecular carbon-carbon pair distribution functions for Ci0oH202 after completion of the third step. Adapted from [144]... Fig. 4.7. Intermolecular carbon-carbon pair distribution functions for Ci0oH202 after completion of the third step. Adapted from [144]...
An intermolecular pair distribution function evaluated at the end of Step 2 would consist of delta functions at those distances allowed on the 2nnd lattice. After completion of reverse mapping, which moves the system from the discrete space of the lattice to a continuum, the carbon-carbon intermolecular pair distribution function becomes continuous, as depicted in Fig. 4.7 [144]. [Pg.106]

Functions and partly also constants for nonbonded interactions within single molecules (intramolecular interactions) have been taken over in many cases from investigations of interactions between different molecules (intermolecular interactions) (7,3). The derivation of parameters for nonbonded interactions presents further difficulties, e.g. the problem of the anisotropy of such interactions (8, 23) and parameter correlations (Section 2.4.). There is no agreement on the question whether pairs of atoms separated by a chain of only three bonds should be counted as nonbonded interactions. Some authors include these pairs,... [Pg.169]

In the study of reactivity, Jorgensen and col. have normally used both, the OPLS model and potential functions derived from ab initio calculations. As we have already indicated, when intermolecular pair potentials are applied to the study of a chemical process, the evolution of charges, as well as the Lennard-Jones terms, along the reaction coordinate, has to be considered. For the SN2 reaction in water between chloride anion... [Pg.160]


See other pages where Pairing function, intermolecular is mentioned: [Pg.76]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.32]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.51 , Pg.52 ]




SEARCH



Function pair

© 2024 chempedia.info