Overlapping classes

This chapter reviews the literature of semiochemical (mostly pheromone) identification in Hymenoptera published since 1990. For this review, we separate the order Hymenoptera into the following three, somewhat overlapping, classes to reflect their differences in biology and semiochemistry solitary, parasitic, and social (Table 1). Although there is considerable literature on the semiochemical activity of specific glandular extracts and the chemical composition of specific glands, only those chemicals with demonstrated pheromonal (or semiochemical) activity will be specifically discussed here. The earlier literature of pheromones in social hymenoptera has previously been reviewed [4-6]. There have been more recent reviews of pheromones in social hymenoptera [7-10], parasitic wasps [11,12], sawflies and seed wasps [13,14], and mating pheromones across Hymenoptera [15]. 

Just two public operations delete() and overlaps() class Event ... 

Figure 4.60. Four examples of overlapped classes, (a) and (c) Partially overlapped classes ) one class contained within another (d) an example of class orientation that is diffiailto model using SIMCA or PCA.

The training set samples may be predicted to be in none, one, or multiple classes. It is tempting to think that if there is overlap of classes A and B, that all class A samples will be predicted to be in classes A and B, and vice versa. However, this is not the case. Figure 4.60 shows some examples of overlapped classes in two dimensions. Only samples in the intersection of two classes are predicted to be in both classes. In Figure 4.60

In 1991 Tindsey introduced a definitive classification scheme for various types of self-assembly across biochemistry and chemistry which still remains the basis for the way in which we think about self-assembly today. Lindsay s scheme divides self-assembly into seven broad, overlapping classes. 

FIGURE 3 Overlapping classes, stray points, and bridges between classes. 

The choice of value for k is somewhat empirical and, for overlapping classes, fc = 3 or 5 have been proposed to provide good classification. In general, however, fc = 1 is the most widely used case and is referred to as the 1-NN method or, simply, the nearest-neighbour method. 

Separation of overlapping classes is not feasible with methods such as discriminant analysis because they are based on optimal separating hyperplanes. SVMs provide an efficient solution to separating nonhnear boundaries by constructing a linear boundary in a large, transformed version of the feature space. 

With the LLM and discriminant analysis covered in this section, classification of an object is carried out strictly by assigning it to the class on either side of the separating plane (hyperplane). To deal with overlapping classes, one approach is to allow for some objects to be on the wrong side of the margin. 

Now we consider overlapping classes in the feature space. One can still try to find a hyperplane allowing for some points to be on the wrong side of the margin. We define the slack variable, and modify the constraints in Eq. (5.145) by... 

In an attempt to provide a general framework for discussion and research, Lindsey introduced a wide-ranging classification scheme, built upon the work of others, that encompasses self-assembly processes in biology and chemistry.This definitive scheme is broken up into seven broad, overlapping, classes. 

Not for formal but for functional reasons, the table could not render these relations for the last two classes of simple substances. Otherwise the tableau would have lost its unambiguity, as the same compounds would have occurred at different places. In chapter 10 we will come back to the problem of overlapping classes in non-encaptic classifications like our Tableau. 

Categorical Data Data or observations that can be separated into non-overlapping classes or sets. These sets are called categories and are usually related to some parameter of the population. 

---