Other elements bond lengths

As in the case of ions we can assign values to covalent bond lengths and covalent bond radii. Interatomic distances can be measured by, for example. X-ray and electron diffraction methods. By halving the interatomic distances obtained for diatomic elements, covalent bond radii can be obtained. Other covalent bond radii can be determined by measurements of bond lengths in other covalently bonded compounds. By this method, tables of multiple as well as single covalent bond radii can be determined. A number of single covalent bond radii in nm are at the top of the next page. 

The Universal Force Field, UFF, is one of the so-called whole periodic table force fields. It was developed by A. Rappe, W Goddard III, and others. It is a set of simple functional forms and parameters used to model the structure, movement, and interaction of molecules containing any combination of elements in the periodic table. The parameters are defined empirically or by combining atomic parameters based on certain rules. Force constants and geometry parameters depend on hybridization considerations rather than individual values for every combination of atoms in a bond, angle, or dihedral. The equilibrium bond lengths were derived from a combination of atomic radii. The parameters [22, 23], including metal ions [24], were published in several papers. 

Table 4.9 Bond Lengths between Carbon and Other Elements...

Table 4.10 Bond Lengths between Elements Other than Carbon...

In Section 4 the data on bond lengths and strengths have been vastly increased so as to include not only the atomic and effective ionic radii of elements and the covalent radii for atoms, but also the bond lengths between carbon and other elements and between elements other than carbon. All... 

When a molecule is symmetric, it is often convenient to start the numbering with atoms lying on a rotation axis or in a symmetry plane. If there are no real atoms on a rotation axis or in a mirror plane, dummy atoms can be useful for defining the symmetry element. Consider for example the cyclopropenyl system which has symmetry. Without dummy atoms one of the C-C bond lengths will be given in terms of the two other C-C distances and the C-C-C angle, and it will be complicated to force the three C-C bonds to be identical. By introducing two dummy atoms to define the C3 axis, this becomes easy. 

The only structurally characterized In—Sb adduct is (Me3SiCH2)3 In—Sb(Tms)3 19 [38], featuring an In—Sb bond distance of 300.8(1) pm. Due to the lack of other structurally characterized In—Sb adducts, no structural comparisons can be made. The In—Sb bond length found in 19 is supposed to be at the lower end of the In—Sb dative bond range since the covalent radius of In (r ov 143 pm) is about 17 pm larger than those of the lighter elements Al and Ga. Therefore, In—Sb dative bonds are expected to... 

The preceding discussion applies only to structural units in which the chain atoms consist principally of carbon or other similarly bonded elements from the first row of the periodic table. The greater bond lengths and modified bond angles for larger atoms lead to rather different circumstances. In the cyclodimethylsiloxane series... 

The values for the covalent radii of N and 0 given in the table dp not differ significantly from the Pauling values, but the value for fluorine is a little smaller. They were obtained by extrapolation of the values for the other period 2 elements (Robinson et al., 1997). In any case the covalent radii of oxygen and fluorine are of little use because, as we shall see later, essentially all bonds formed by these elements, except the O—O, O—F, and F—F bonds, which are abnormally weak and long, have too great an ionic character to justify the use of covalent radii to calculate bond lengths. 

---