Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Organisational vs. geographical proximity

Several contributions explore the motives and the benefits that arise when scientists collaborate. (See, among others, de Solla Price 1966 Merton 1973 Narin and Withlow, 1990). Moreover, when the mechanisms that give rise to [Pg.120]

To test these propositions I selected 4,650 patents where at least one inventor is located in Europe out of a random sample of 10,000 chemical patents applied at the EPO in 1986-1997, and defined three patent characteristics  [Pg.123]

Breadth of the network. The breadth of the network of inventors is proxied by the number of inventors listed in the patents. Again, a higher [Pg.123]

The data used in this chapter are drawn from different sourees. I started by selecting a random sample of 10,000 chemical patents from a database of 201,531 chemical patents granted and applied at the European Patent Office (EPO, 1998) between 1986-1997.1 did not make any distinction between patent applications that have been granted, and those that have not been granted yet. [Pg.124]


See other pages where Organisational vs. geographical proximity is mentioned: [Pg.120]   


SEARCH



Geographers

Geographic

Organisation

Organisations organisation

Proximal

Proximates

Proximation

Proximity

© 2024 chempedia.info