Orbital primitive

Copper has a FCC structure with one atom m the primitive unit cell. From simple orbital counting, one might... 

To incorporate the angular dependence of a basis function into Gaussian orbitals, either spherical haimonics or integer powers of the Cartesian coordinates have to be included. We shall discuss the latter case, in which a primitive basis function takes the form... 

Th e con traction expon en ts and cocfTicien ts of th e d-type functions were optinii/ed using five d-primitives (the first set of d-type functions) for the STO-XG basis sets and six d-primitives (the second set of d-type functions ) for the split-valence basis sets. Thus, five d orbitals are recommended for the STO-XG basis sets and six d orhitals for the split-valence basis sets. 

Because of its severe approximations, in using the Huckel method (1932) one ignores most of the real problems of molecular orbital theory. This is not because Huckel, a first-rate mathematician, did not see them clearly they were simply beyond the power of primitive mechanical calculators of his day. Huckel theory provided the foundation and stimulus for a generation s research, most notably in organic chemistry. Then, about 1960, digital computers became widely available to the scientific community. 

The remainder of the input file gives the basis set. The line, 1 0, specifies the atom center 1 (the only atom in this case) and is terminated by 0. The next line contains a shell type, S for the Is orbital, tells the system that there is 1 primitive Gaussian, and gives the scale factor as 1.0 (unsealed). The next line gives Y = 0.282942 for the Gaussian function and a contiaction coefficient. This is the value of Y, the Gaussian exponential parameter that we found in Computer Project 6-1, Part B. [The precise value for y comes from the closed solution for this problem S/Oir (McWeeny, 1979).] There is only one function, so the contiaction coefficient is 1.0. The line of asterisks tells the system that the input is complete. 

In the 6-3IG basis, the inner shell of carbon is represented by 6 primitives and the 4 valence shell orbitals are represented by 2 contracted orbitals each consisting of 4 primitives, 3 contracted and 1 uncontracted (hence the designation 6-31). That gives... 

These integrals over mo s ean, through the LCAO-MO expansion, ultimately be expressed in terms of one- and two-eleetron integrals over the primitive atomie orbitals. It is only these ao-based integrals that ean be evaluated explieitly (on high speed eomputers for all but the smallest systems). 

The functions put into the determinant do not need to be individual GTO functions, called Gaussian primitives. They can be a weighted sum of basis functions on the same atom or different atoms. Sums of functions on the same atom are often used to make the calculation run faster, as discussed in Chapter 10. Sums of basis functions on different atoms are used to give the orbital a particular symmetry. For example, a water molecule with symmetry will have orbitals that transform as A, A2, B, B2, which are the irreducible representations of the C2t point group. The resulting orbitals that use functions from multiple atoms are called molecular orbitals. This is done to make the calculation run much faster. Any overlap integral over orbitals of different symmetry does not need to be computed because it is zero by symmetry. 

Another family of basis sets, commonly referred to as the Pople basis sets, are indicated by the notation 6—31G. This notation means that each core orbital is described by a single contraction of six GTO primitives and each valence shell orbital is described by two contractions, one with three primitives and the other with one primitive. These basis sets are very popular, particularly for organic molecules. Other Pople basis sets in this set are 3—21G, 4—31G, 4—22G, 6-21G, 6-31IG, and 7-41G. 

Many basis sets are just identihed by the author s surname and the number of primitive functions. Some examples of this are the Huzinaga, Dunning, and Duijneveldt basis sets. For example, D95 and D95V are basis sets created by Dunning with nine s primitives and hve p primitives. The V implies one particular contraction scheme for the valence orbitals. Another example would be a basis set listed as Duijneveldt 13s8p . 

There are several issues to consider when using ECP basis sets. The core potential may represent all but the outermost electrons. In other ECP sets, the outermost electrons and the last filled shell will be in the valence orbital space. Having more electrons in the core will speed the calculation, but results are more accurate if the —1 shell is outside of the core potential. Some ECP sets are designated as shape-consistent sets, which means that the shape of the atomic orbitals in the valence region matches that for all electron basis sets. ECP sets are usually named with an acronym that stands for the authors names or the location where it was developed. Some common core potential basis sets are listed below. The number of primitives given are those describing the valence region. 

There are several types of basis functions listed below. Over the past several decades, most basis sets have been optimized to describe individual atoms at the EIF level of theory. These basis sets work very well, although not optimally, for other types of calculations. The atomic natural orbital, ANO, basis sets use primitive exponents from older EIF basis sets with coefficients obtained from the natural orbitals of correlated atom calculations to give a basis that is a bit better for correlated calculations. The correlation-consistent basis sets have been completely optimized for use with correlated calculations. Compared to ANO basis sets, correlation consistent sets give a comparable accuracy with significantly fewer primitives and thus require less CPU time. 

MINI—i i = 1—4) These four sets have different numbers of primitives per contraction, mostly three or four. These are minimal basis sets with one contraction per orbital. Available for Li through Rn. 

MIDI—i Same primitives as the MINI basis sets with two contractions to describe the valence orbitals for greater flexibility. 

G Same number of primitives as STO—3G, but more flexibility in the valence orbitals. Available for H through Cs. Popular for qualitative and sometimes quantitative results for organic molecules. 

Likewise, a basis set can be improved by uncontracting some of the outer basis function primitives (individual GTO orbitals). This will always lower the total energy slightly. It will improve the accuracy of chemical predictions if the primitives being uncontracted are those describing the wave function in the middle of a chemical bond. The distance from the nucleus at which a basis function has the most significant effect on the wave function is the distance at which there is a peak in the radial distribution function for that GTO primitive. The formula for a normalized radial GTO primitive in atomic units is... 

The contracted basis in Figure 28.3 is called a minimal basis set because there is one contraction per occupied orbital. The valence region, and thus chemical bonding, could be described better if an additional primitive were added to each of the valence orbitals. This is almost always done using the even-tempered method. This method comes from the observation that energy-optimized exponents tend to nearly follow an exponential pattern given by... 

Minimal basis sets use fixed-size atomic-type orbitals. The STO-3G basis set is a minimal basis set (although it is not the smallest possible basis set). It uses three gaussian primitives per basis function, which accounts for the 3G in its name. STO stands for Slater-type orbitals, and the STO-3G basis set approximates Slater orbitals with gaussian functions. ... 

---