Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Orbital Criterion

Be careful when you use the Orbital Criterion for symmetrical system s. To get correct resnlis, you in u st include all or none of any set of degenerate orbitals in the Cl, n ot jn si some of them. Carrying out an RIIF calculation first and studying the Orbitals dialog box will help you to spot degenerate orbitals and avoid this pitfall. [Pg.39]

In large systems there can be many orbitals in a small energy range, and the size of the Cl matrix can be very sensitive to the value of the maximum excitation if you use Biergy Criterion. Since calculation time depends heavily on the size of the Cl matrix, you can end up with very long calculations, especially if you use the ab initio methods or the MNDO, AMI, or PM3 semi-empirical methods. This could exhaust the memory of your system. Again, inspecting the results of an RHF (no Cl) calculation will help you avoid these pitfalls. [Pg.40]

The calculation mixes all single determinant wavefunctions that can be obtained from the ground state by exciting electrons from a subset of the occupied orbitals (of the ground state) to a subset of the unoccupied orbitals. The subsets are specified as a fixed number (highest occupied or lowest unoccupied) or by an energy criterion associated with the energy difference between the occupied orbital and the unoccupied orbital. [Pg.117]

If the perturbation function shows cubic symmetry, and in certain other special cases, the first-order perturbation energy is not effective in destroying the orbital magnetic moment, for the eigenfunction px = = i py leads to the same first-order perturbation terms as pi or pv or any other combinations of them. In such cases the higher order perturbation energies are to be compared with the multiplet separation in the above criterion. [Pg.91]

In the 1930 s HiickeP proposed, on the basis of molecular-orbital calculations, a theoretical criterion for aromaticity of cyclic polyenes, known as Hiickers rule, which states that cyclic polyenes should be aromatic if, and only if, they contain 4n- -2 Jt-electrons. At that time only two of such cyclic polyenes were known benzene and cyclo-pentadienyl anion, each having six rc-electrons and satisfying Huckel s rule. Since then, the validity of Hiickel s rule had not been challenged... [Pg.4]

For this calculation we used the basis set s,2s,2p of Fraga and Ransil (35) which gives near HF limit quality for energy Ehfl = -1.13362957 (34)). The polarization functions were derived from the Is orbital only, like in He calculations. Their exponent was optimized using the maximum probability criterion (Copt = 1-1). Table 7 presents the obtained results. [Pg.275]

A basis set ofhybrid AOs,having o, tt or n character, is prepared by the Slater s,p valence set according to the maximum overlap criterion [31,46]. An extension to d orbitals is in progress. [Pg.382]

A very important criterion for electron structure is the percent d-character, which characterizes the number of unpaired electrons in the rf-orbitals of the individual metal atom. Because of the vacancies existing in these orbitals, metals will interact with electron-donating species forming electron pairs. It is this interaction that determines the special features of adsorption of these species and, as a consequence, the catalytic activity of a given metal. [Pg.530]

The advantage of the scheme lies in possibility to cut indices with a distant dependent selection criterion, rendering the method potentially linear scaling. As a consequence, orbitals for periodic structures may be created in this way (see References [25, 26]). [Pg.143]

Ans. (a) 2. (h) 10, and (c) 6. Note that the principal quantum number docs not affect the number of orbitals and thus the maximum number of electrons. The angular momentum quantum number is the only criterion of that. [Pg.266]

Beside the bigger size of the phosphorus atom, as compared to that of nitrogen, the lack of aromaticity is due to the P-pyramide the criterion of coplanarity is not fulfilled and so the lone electron pair of the phosphorus cannot overlap with the pz orbitals of the sp2 carbon atoms (Fig. 2). While in the case of pyrrole, the aromatic stabilization covers the energy requirement of planarization, in the case of phospholes, there is a bigger barrier for the inversion. [Pg.152]


See other pages where Orbital Criterion is mentioned: [Pg.234]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.759]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.291]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]




SEARCH



Localized molecular orbitals different criteria

Orbitals different criteria

Relative sizes of hydrogenic orbitals and the probability criterion

© 2024 chempedia.info