Basis sets optimized

There have been a few basis sets optimized for use with DFT calculations, but these give little if any increase in efficiency over using EIF optimized basis sets for these calculations. In general, DFT calculations do well with moderate-size HF basis sets and show a significant decrease in accuracy when a minimal basis set is used. Other than this, DFT calculations show only a slight improvement in results when large basis sets are used. This seems to be due to the approximate nature of the density functional limiting accuracy more than the lack of a complete basis set. 

There are hints [9,10,18] that the rate of convergence for basis sets of type (1.2) is even better than (1.4), if one uses better optimized basis sets than those of even tempered type (1.3),... 

This procedure corresponds to a full Cl (i.e. including all possible excitations) within a restricted set of occupied and virtual MOs (called die active space , hence the CAS acronym). In addition, die AO coefficients in die one-electron MOs are simultaneously optimized, such that these eventually represent an optimal basis set for the given CL... 

In a previous paper on hydrogen peroxide, the pseudopotential was determined with the A algorithm. The aim of this paper was the evaluation of the basis set effect on the levels. In the present paper, the old calculations have been repeated with the optimal basis set improving the optimization of the internal coordinates. It has to be remarked from the results in Tables, 1 and 2 that the B and C algorithms lead to similar results whereas the A algorithm gives the lowest results for the pseudopotential. V is unappreciated when is determined with the A algorithm. 

Methods are introduced for generating many-electron Sturmian basis sets using the actual external potential experienced by an N-electron system, i.e. the attractive potential of the nuclei. When such basis sets are employed, very few basis functions are needed for an accurate representation of the system the kinetic energy term disappears from the secular equation solution of the secular equation provides automatically an optimal basis set and a solution to the many-electron problem is found directly, including electron correlation, and without the self-consistent field approximation. In the case of molecules, the momentum-space hyperspherical harmonic methods of Fock, Shibuya and Wulfman are shown to be very well suited to the construction of many-electron Sturmian basis functions. 

For the very highest accuracy, the effect of at least core-valence correlation should be explored. This must be accompanied by some serious effort to extend the basis so that core-correlating functions are included. Using valence-optimized basis sets and including core correlation is not only a waste of computer time, but a potential source of problems, as it can substantially increase BSSE. This point is not well appreciated the prevailing view appears to be that no harm can come of correlating the core when the basis set is inadequate. This is not so. 

We need to optimize basis sets for 3rd and 4th row atoms in the Periodic Table. 

P. Calaminici et al., Density functional theory optimized basis sets for gradient corrected functionals 3d transition metal systems. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 044108/1-10 (2007)... 

The present article is devoted to a discussion of a multiconfiguration approach, the Optimized Basis Set - Generalized Multiconfiguration Spin-Coupled (OBS-GMCSC) method [l]-[2], that can join the flexibility of non-orthogonal orbitals with the use of simultaneously optimized Slater-type basis functions (STFs). 

The OBS-SC energy lies about 1.47 eV below the SCF energy, as computed with a corresponding, and similarly optimized, basis set (the OBS-SCF energy), see Table 4. 

Fig. 8 The effect of basis set on the specific rotation of (S)-methyloxirane calculated with the B3LYP functional at 589 nm. The key labels the method of geometry optimization. Basis set numbers correspond to the following 1 = 6-31G(d), 2 = 6-31+-l-G(d,p), 3 = 6-31++G(2d,2p), 4 = cc-pVDZ, 5 = cc-pVTZ, 6 = aug-cc-pVDZ, 7 = d-aug-cc-pVDZ, 8 = mixed-cc-PVTZ (aug-cc-pVTZ(C,0) and aug-cc-pVDZ(H)), 9 = aug-cc-pVTZ, 10 = Sadlej-pVTZ. Data to prepare the plot were taken from [145]...

Optimization of basis sets is not something the average user need to worry about. Optimized basis sets of many different sizes and qualities are available either in the forms of tables, or built into the computer programs. The user merely has to select a suitable basis set. However, if the interest is in specialized properties the basis set may need to be tailored to meet the specific needs. For example if the property of interest is an accurate value for the electron densitv at the nucleus Ifor example for determining The Is-orbital is thus described by a fixed linear combination of say six basis functions. Similarly the remaining four basis functions may be contracted into only two functions, for example by fixing the coefficient in front of the inner three functions. In doing this the number of basis functions to be handled by the variational procedure has been reduced from 10 to three. 

In this procedure first a traditional FSGO calculation is carried out for each species, so the fully optimized basis set is chosen. Then the density function is calculated using the following equation. 

Optimization of basis sets is not something the average user need to worry about. Optimized basis sets of many different sizes and qualities are available either in the forms of tables, or built into the computer programs. The user merely has to select a suitable basis set. However, if the interest is in specialized properties the basis set may-... 

One disadvantage of all energy optimized basis sets is the fact that they primarily depend on the wave function in the region of the inner shell electrons. The 1 s-electrons account for a large part of the total energy, and minimizing the energy will tend to make the basis set optimum for the core electrons, and less than optimum for the valence electrons. However, chemistry is mainly dependent on the valence electrons ... 

Furthermore, many properties (for example polarizability) depend mainly on the wave function tail (far from the nucleus), which energetically is unimportant. An energy optimized basis set which gives a good description of the outer part of the wave function... 

The Z-axis forms an angle of 17° with the Zn-Ow bond shown in Figure 1. The position of Zn in the plane below [i.e., (0.0, 0.0, 0.0)] is indicated by dotted lines. The molecular wavefunctions were calculated with an ab-initio LCAO-SCF method using minimal STO-4G atom optimized basis sets. The basis set for Zn was augmented by additional diffused 3d and 4p functions obtained from an STO-4G expansion of Slater orbitals with exponents of 1.6575 and 1.45, respectively. The method used for the calculation of the electrostatic potentials is described in Ref. 65. Units are Kcal/mol. 

---