Occupied Palestinian Territory, Wall

ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004, ICJ Rep. 2004, para 106 and Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), l.C.J. Reports 2005, para 216 (Congo V. Uganda). 

ICJ East Timor case (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment 30 June 1995,1.C.J. Reports 1995 ICJ (Advisory Opinion) Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, 8 July 1996. See also ICJ (Advisory Opinion) Legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian Territory, 9 July 2004... 

Two additional ICJ cases are worthy of discussion. First, the ICJ Advisory Opinion of October 16, 1975, on Western Sahara lays an important ground work on the question of self-determination in the decolonization context this advisory opinion has been widely cited in other relevant discussions of self-determination and in subsequent ICJ cases, including the one on Kosovo just discussed. Second, the ICJ Advisory Opinion of July 9, 2004, on the legality of the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory discusses the issue of self-determination in the context of Palestine and thus outside the paradigm of decolonization in addition, this opinion highlights the world... 

Legal Consequences of the Constmction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2004, p. 136 [hereinafter Wall Opinion . ... 

---