Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Obtained from random structures

Computer generation of images from random structures. The stereological measurements described above provide a method for estimating three- dimensional properties from observations on two-dimensional images. Unfortunately, the quality of these estimates is sometimes difficult to assess. In order to verify the correctness of our method and to determine the minimum number of samples which must be observed to obtain satisfactory estimates, computer generated random structures were examined. [Pg.23]

The dimension obtained from random flight calculation, which includes the effects of bond angles and hindrances to rotation about bonds, is referred to as the unperturbed dimension of the polymer chain. It is represented by the symbol (rg ). The subscript zero is used to emphasize the condition that the molecule is subject only to local constraints involving the geometrical character of the bond structure and restricted rotation. [Pg.323]

Detailed explanations of all parameters in equation (3) are given by Prange et al [11]. It is important to note here that all parameters other than the Fs are obtained from known structural properties of the solvent or polymer (i.e., V., q., and the z., s), and are not adjusted to binary data. However, the non-random factors (Fs) depend on three adjustable exchange-energy parameters (which are Independent of temperature). These parameters describe interactions between different types of contact sites, and must be obtained from experimental phase equilibria for the binary polymer-solvent mixture. [Pg.208]

Within the multichannel Bayesian formalism of structure determination, it is indeed possible to make use ofMaxEnt distributions to model systems whose missing structure can be reasonably depicted as made of random independent scatterers. This requires that the structural information absent in the diffraction data be obtained from some other experimental or theoretical source. The known substructure can be described making use of a parametrised model. [Pg.16]

HETP is typically in the range 0.3 to 0.9 m for random packings and 0.2 to 0.7 m for structured packings. Various correlations are available for HETP, but the designer should use them with great caution, and reliable values can only be obtained from experimental data or packing manufacturers. HETP is normally correlated against an F-Factorn ... [Pg.172]

This multitude of properties the polymer must possess dictate that better polymer performance will be obtained from materials with complicated structures. Such polymers are complex polymers l) random copolymers, 2) block copolymers, 3) graft copolymers, 4) micellizing copolymers, and 5) network copolymers. There has been a dramatic increase in the past decade in the number and complexity of these copolymers and a sizable number of these new products have been made from natural products. The synthesis, analysis, and testing of lignin and starch, natural product copolymers, with particular emphasis on graft copolymers designed for enhanced oil recovery, will be presented. [Pg.181]

Consequently, several hidden quantities can be estimated on the basis of the SMO approach. The procedure based on Equation 4.13 can be simply extended even to 2D separations as described in Fig. 4.7. In practice, the 2D pattern, in terms of spot positions and abundances, is divided into several strips. Each strip is transformed into a ID line chromatogram and the procedure described in Fig. 4.7 is then applied. Equation 4.13 is employed to calculate the m value of each strip from which the total m value is obtained. Applications to this procedure will be reported in Section 4.5. At this point, the reader s attention is drawn to the fact that the procedure of transforming 2D strips into ID chromatograms (see Fig. 4.7) once more corresponds to the overlapping mechanisms described in Fig. 4.2 and has been evocated in comparing Fig. 4.4 with Fig. 4.3. In this way, if random structures (e.g., such as those marked in Fig. 4.1b) are present, their memory is lost and the 2D pattern is reduced to a Poissonian ID one. Therefore, the number of SCs can be correctly estimated, even if the 2D pattern was not Poissonian. [Pg.72]

In addition to fluorescence methods, another study [27] developed a method to permit electron microscopic localization of Ras anchor domains on cytoplasmic membrane surfaces by immunogold labeling. The particle neighbor distances can be analyzed to obtain information about possible domain structure. Expressing H-Ras and K-Ras in baby hamster kidney cells, a nonrandom particle distribution was obtained from which the estimated mean raft size was 7.5-22 nm and about 35% of the membrane area consists of rafts. The same technique applied to cells that had been incubated with [3-cydodextrin to reduce cholesterol produced completely random distributions of H-Ras. This cholesterol dependence suggests some type of coupling of rafts across the inner and outer membrane leaflets. [Pg.29]


See other pages where Obtained from random structures is mentioned: [Pg.346]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.765]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.2209]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.97]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 ]




SEARCH



Random structure

© 2024 chempedia.info