Observed Quantum Evolution

For the case of observed quantum evolution, the averaged observed position is considered in relation with the quantum fluetuation by the general relationship 

When Eqs. (4.553) and (4.554) are considered into the identity (4.542), according with the step (iii) above, the actual average of the second order coordinate is obtained 

Not surprisingly, when further combining relations (4.553) and (4.555) in computing the coordinate dispersion of Eq. (4.539), i.e., fulfilling the step iv) above, one regains the value of Eq. (4.543) that recovers at its turn the standard HUR no matter how much the quantum fluctuation is modulated by the factor n. However, the P(article)AV(ave) ratio of Eq. (4.551) takes the form (Putz, 2010c) 

---

Through characterizing the numerical results of Eq. (4.562), one firstly observes that they practically start from where the PAV function of Eq. (4.556) approaches its highest output. In other words, this tell us remarkable information according to which the observed and free quantum evolutions are continuous realities, being smoothly accorded in the point of precise measurement ( = 0). Another very interesting observation is that the PAV ratio symmetrically spans in Eq. (4.562) the existence domain either for wave PAVe [0.952, 1) or particle PAV ( 1, 1.048] manifestations around their exact equivalence PAV = 1. However, the precise wave-particle equivalence is two-fold, namely in the socalled omega ( 2) and alpha (a) points of Eq. (4.562) characterized by the extended HUR versions of Eq. (4.561) written, respectively, as... 

It is very instructive to present in a unitary manner the observed and free quantum evolution cases in the chart of Figure 4.6 by linking the HUR shapes of Eqs. (2.99) and (4.561) with the particle/wave ratios values of Eqs. (4.556) and (4.562), respectively. The PAV contribution spreads from the exclusively undulatory quantum manifestation (PAV = 0) in the observed domain of quantum evolution until the particle dominance (PAV > 1) in the free domain of quantum evolution. 

FIGURE 4.6 The chart of Heisenberg Uncertainty Relationship (HUR) appearance for observed and free quantum evolutions covering the complete scale of the particle to wave ratios as computed from the Eqs. (4.556) and (4.562), respectively the points Q and a correspond to wave-particle precise equivalence and to the special extended-HURs of Eqs. (4.563) and (4.564), respectively (Putz, 2010c). 

However, the wave-particle duality matches perfectly and always with HUR in its standard (Schrodinger) formulation of Eq. (2.99) on the other side, the wave-particle exact equivalence (PAV = 1) may be acquired only in the free evolution regime that, in turn, it is driven by modified HUR as given by Eq. (4.563). In other words, it seems that any experiment or observation upon a quantum object or system would destroy the PAV balance specific for free quantum evolution towards the undulatory manifestation through measurement. 

Yet, having the analytical expressions for both observed and free quantum evolutions may considerably refine our imderstanding of macro- and micro-universe. For instance, with various (PAV)... 

Historically, the potential power of quantum computation was first proclaimed in a talk of Richard Feynman at the first Conference on the Physics of Computation at MIT in 1981 [15]. He observed that it appeared to be impossible in general to simulate the evolution of a quantum system on a classical computer in an efficient way. The computer simulation of quantum evolution involves an exponential slowdown in time, compared with the natural evolution. The amount of classical information required to describe the evolving quantum state is exponentially larger than that required to describe the corresponding classical system with a similar accuracy. But, instead of regarding this intractability as an obstacle, Feynman considered it an opportunity. He explained that if it requires that much computation to find what will happen in a multi-particle interference experiment, then the amount of such an experiment and measuring the outcome is equivalent to performing a complex computation. 

Molecular modeling has evolved as a synthesis of techniques from a number of disciplines—organic chemistry, medicinal chemistry, physical chemistry, chemical physics, computer science, mathematics, and statistics. With the development of quantum mechanics (1,2) ia the early 1900s, the laws of physics necessary to relate molecular electronic stmcture to observable properties were defined. In a confluence of related developments, engineering and the national defense both played roles ia the development of computing machinery itself ia the United States (3). This evolution had a direct impact on computing ia chemistry, as the newly developed devices could be appHed to problems ia chemistry, permitting solutions to problems previously considered intractable. 

An alternative way of acquiring the data is to observe the signal. These experiments are referred to as reverse- or inverse-detected experiments, in particular the inverse HETCOR experiment is referred to as a heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC) spectmm. The ampHtude of the H nuclei is modulated by the coupled frequencies of the C nuclei in the evolution time. The principal difficulty with this experiment is that the C nuclei must be decoupled from the H spectmm. Techniques used to do this are called GARP and WALTZ sequences. The information is the same as that of the standard HETCOR except that the F and F axes have been switched. The obvious advantage to this experiment is the significant increase in sensitivity that occurs by observing H rather than C. 

The quantum yield of photosynthesis, the amount of product formed per equivalent of light input, has traditionally been expressed as the ratio of COg fixed or Og evolved per quantum absorbed. At each reaction center, one photon or quantum yields one electron. Interestingly, an overall stoichiometry of one translocated into the thylakoid vesicle for each photon has also been observed. Two photons per center would allow a pair of electrons to flow from HgO to NADP (Figure 22.12), resulting in the formation of 1 NADPH and Og. If one ATP were formed for every 3 H translocated during photosynthetic electron transport, 1 ATP would be synthesized. More appropriately, 4 hv per center (8 quanta total) would drive the evolution of 1 Og, the reduction of 2 NADP, and the phosphorylation of 2 ATP. 

Quantum Cellular Automata (QCA) in order to address the possibly very fundamental role CA-like dynamics may play in the microphysical domain, some form of quantum dynamical generalization to the basic rule structure must be considered. One way to do this is to replace the usual time evolution of what may now be called classical site values ct, by unitary transitions between fe-component complex probability- amplitude states, ct > - defined in sncli a way as to permit superposition of states. As is standard in quantum mechanics, the absolute square of these amplitudes is then interpreted to give the probability of observing the corresponding classical value. Two indepcuidently defined models - both of which exhibit much of the typically quantum behavior observed in real systems are discussed in chapter 8.2,... 

Much of the regularity in classical systems can often be best discerned directly by observing their spatial power spectra (see section 6.3). We recall that in the simplest cases, the spectra consist of few isolated discrete peaks in more complex chaotic evolutions, we might get white noise patterns (such as for elementary additive rules). A discrete fourier transform (/ ) of a typical quantum state is defined in the most straightforward manner ... 

It is worth to remark that the opposite also happens. There is an evolution in the experimental teehniques too, and in some eases this progress makes possible ( or competitive) the measurement of a quantity formerly available via computations only. One example is the detailed measurement of the electronic density of a molecule, and of the related molecular electrostatic potential. The determination of these two observables has been for many years a task feasible only by quantum-mechanical methods, now the progresses in the elaboration of diffraction technique measurements makes possible a direct determination. 

Exploitation of time-resolved spectroscopy allows the direct observation of the reactive intermediates (i.e., ion-radical pair) involved in the oxidation of enol silyl ether (ESE) by photoactivated chloranil (3CA ), and their temporal evolution to the enone and adduct in the following way.41c Photoexcitation of chloranil (at lexc = 355 nm) produces excited chloranil triplet (3CA ) which is a powerful electron acceptor (EKelectron-rich enol silyl ethers (Em = 1.0-1.5 V versus SCE) to the ion-radical pair with unit quantum yield, both in dichloromethane and in acetonitrile (equation 20). 

---