Nucleophilic aliphatic solvent effects

Most of the kinetic measures of solvent effects have been developed for the study of nucleophilic substitution (Sn) at saturated carbon, solvolytic reactions in particular. It may, therefore, be helpful to give a brief review of aliphatic nucleophilic substitution. Two mechanistic routes have been clearly identified. One of these is shown by... 

There is an ongoing controversy about whether there is any stabilization of the transition state for nucleophilic substitution at tertiary aliphatic carbon from interaction with nucleophilic solvent." ° This controversy has developed with the increasing sophistication of experiments to characterize solvent effects on the rate constants for solvolysis reactions. Grunwald and Winstein determined rate constants for solvolysis of tert-butyl chloride in a wide variety of solvents and used these data to define the solvent ionizing parameter T (Eq. 3). They next found that rate constants for solvolysis of primary and secondary aliphatic carbon show a smaller sensitivity (m) to changes in Y than those for the parent solvolysis reaction of tert-butyl chloride (for which m = 1 by definition). A second term was added ( N) to account for the effect of changes in solvent nucleophilicity on obsd that result from transition state stabilization by a nucleophilic interaction between solvent and substrate. It was first assumed that there is no significant stabilization of the transition state for solvolysis of tert-butyl chloride from such a nucleophilic interaction. However, a close examination of extensive rate data revealed, in some cases, a correlation between rate constants for solvolysis of fert-butyl derivatives and solvent nucleophicity. " ... 

The khietics of die reactions of 1 -halo-2.4-dinitrobcnzcncs with aliphatic amines have been used to probe solvent effects in mixtures of chloroform or dichloromethane with polar hydrogen-bond acceptors, such as DMSO. In these reactions, nucleophilic attack is rate limiting. Attempts to correlate reactivity with the empirical solvent... 

It should be mentioned that the ionization step in Eq. (2-13) is analogous to that involved in SnI and Sn2 reactions of aliphatic substrates. For example, in solvolytic reactions of haloalkanes, the process of going from a covalently bonded initial state to a dipolar or ionic activated complex (transition state) is similar to the ionization step in Eq. (2-13). Therefore, those solvent properties that promote ionization are also important in the estimation of solvent effects on nucleophilic displacement reactions [161] (cf. Section 5.4.1). 

Neglecting solvent effects is extremely hazardous. Equilibria and kinetics can be dramatically altered by the nature of the solvent For example, the rate of nucleophilic substitution reactions spans 20 orders of magnitude in going from the gas phase to polar and nonpolar solvents. A classical example of a dramatic solvent effect on equilibrium is the tautomerism between 1 and 2. In the gas phase, the equilibrium lies far to the left, while in the solution phase, 2 dominates because of its much larger dipole moment." Another classical example is that the trend in gas-phase acidity of aliphatic alcohols is reverse of the well-known trend in the solution phase in other words, in the solution phase, the relative acidity trend is R3COH < R2CHOH < RCH2OH, but the opposite is true in the gas phase. ... 

Table 2.1.1. Rules of Hughes-Ingold on the effect of the increase of the polarity of the solvent on the rate of nucleophilic aliphatic reactions...

Since charged species are often created or destroyed in nucleophilic substitution reactions, we can anticipate that solvent effects might be large. When examining the effect that the solvent can have on the rate of any reaction, it is important to compare the relative solvations of the reactants and the transition state. Differences in the solvation of the two affect the rate. In the case of nucleophilic aliphatic substitution, we need to compare the solvation of the alkyl-LG species and the separate nucleophile relative to the transition state. Often, the solvent itself is the nucleophile, and in these cases we are not as concerned with how it solvates itself. 

Scheme 15.4 Solvent effects in aliphatic nucleophilic fluorination reactions.

Thiols react more rapidly with nucleophilic radicals than with electrophilic radicals. They have very large Ctr with S and VAc, but near ideal transfer constants (C - 1.0) with acrylic monomers (Table 6.2). Aromatic thiols have higher C,r than aliphatic thiols but also give more retardation. This is a consequence of the poor reinitiation efficiency shown by the phenylthiyl radical. The substitution pattern of the alkanethiol appears to have only a small (<2-fokl) effect on the transfer constant. Studies on the reactions of small alkyl radicals with thiols indicate that the rate of the transfer reaction is accelerated in polar solvents and, in particular, water.5 Similar trends arc observed for transfer to 1 in S polymerization with Clr = 1.4 in benzene 3.6 in CUT and 6.1 in 5% aqueous CifiCN.1 In copolymerizations, the thiyl radicals react preferentially with electron-rich monomers (Section 3.4.3.2). 

The polymers used in this study were prepared by a nucleophilic activated aromatic substitution reaction of a bisphenate and dihalo diphenyl sulfone ( ). The reaction was carried out in an aprotic dipolar solvent (NMP) at 170°C in the presence of potassium carbonate (Scheme 1) (5,6). The polymers were purified by repeated precipitation into methanol/water, followed by drying to constant weight. The bisphenols used were bisphenol-A (Bis-A), hydroquinone (Hq) and biphenol (Bp). Thus, the aliphatic character of Bis-A could be removed while retaining a similar aromatic content and structure. The use of biphenol allows an investigation of the possible effect of extended conjugation on the radiation degradation. 

---