Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nonoriented polymers fracture

It was also found [6], that in this case experimentally determined values of athermic fracture stress turn out to be essentially (2 3 times) smaller than theoretically calculated ones. A small values k 0.2 1.0) is one more important feature of nonoriented polymers fracture in impact tests. This means, that the stress on breaking bonds is essentially lower than nominal fracture stress of bulk sample. And at last, it was found out [7], that the value k reduces at testing temperature growth and the transition from brittle fiactuie to ductile (plastic) one. These effects explanation was proposed in Refs. [4-7], but development of fractal analysis ideas in respect to polymers lately and particularly, Alexander and Orbach woik [8] appearance, which introduced the fraction notion, allows to offer the major treatment of polymer fracture process [9, 10], including the dilaton concept [1-3] as a constituent part. [Pg.140]

Thus, the stated above results demonstrated, that fractal analysis application for polymers fracture process description allowed to give more general fracture concept, than a dilation one. Let us note, that the dilaton model equations are still applicable in this more general case, at any rate formally. The fractal concept of polymers fracture includes dilaton theory as an individual case for nonfractal (Euclidean) parts of chains between topological fixation points, characterized by the excited states delocalization. The offered concept allows to revise the main factors role in nonoriented polymers fracture process. Local anharmonicity ofintraand intermolecular bonds, local mechanical overloads on bonds and chains molecular mobility are such factors in the first place [9, 10]. [Pg.145]

Let us consider the reasons of the adduced in Table 7.1 values k < 1 for nonoriented polymers. As it has been shown in chapter two, the value characterizes molecular mobility (deformability) level of the indicated chain part [17]. At = 1.0 this mobihty is suppressed completely and at =2.0 it reaches the greatest possible level, typical for rubber-like state. Molecular mobility intensification results to corresponding stress relaxation intensification, applied to chain part between entanglements and, as consequence, to its reduction lower than macroscopic sample fracture stress [18], Such treatment assumes availability of the correlation between parameters K and This assumption is confirmed by the plot of Fig. 7.1, where the dependence for 10 polymers, pointed out in table 7.1, is adduced... [Pg.142]

Let us consider further reasons of pol5rmer chains breaking at so small stresses, which can be on order lower than ftacture macroscopic stress (i.e., at h5rpothetical k = 0.1). The reasons were pointed for the first time in Refs. [1, 26]. Firstly, anharmonicity intensification in fracture center gives the effect, identical to mechanical overloading effect [26]. Quantitatively this effect is expressed by the ratio of thermal expansion coefficient in fracture center and modal thermal expansion coefficient [5]. The second reason is close inter communication of local yielding and fracture processes [ 1]. This allows to identify fracture center for nonoriented polymers as local plasticity zone [27, 28]. The ratio uJ(X in this case can be reached -100 [5]. This effect compensates completely k reduction lower than one. So, for PC ala 70, K- = 0.44, a. = O.IE. 700 MPa and fiien o = o a /K,a 23 MPa, that by order of magnitude corresponds to experimental value Oj. for PC, which is equal approximately to 50 MPa at T= 293 K [7]. [Pg.145]


See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.140 , Pg.145 ]




SEARCH



Polymer fracture

© 2024 chempedia.info