Nonadiabatic decay

Conical intersections are involved in other types of chemistry in addition to photochemistry. Photochemical reactions are nonadiabatic because they involve at least two potential energy surfaces, and decay from the excited state to the ground state takes place as shown, for example, in Figure 9.2a. However, there are also other types of nonadiabatic chemistry, which start on the ground state, followed by an ex-cnrsion npward onto the excited state (Fig. 9.2b). Electron transfer problems belong to this class of nonadiabatic chemistry, and we have documented conical intersection... 

A question that becomes obvious at this point is what happens to the molecules that have similar structures to the natural bases but have different photophysical properties, i.e. they fluoresce. These molecules have similar main structure to the bases, similar ring systems and double bonds, and so, according to the previous discussion, similar conical intersections should be expected. If that is true, and conical intersections facilitate efficient radiationless decay, why do these molecules fluoresce instead of decaying nonadiabatically That is a question that has occupied a number of scientists and some answers and insights are given in the following section. 

Next, we discuss the J = 0 calculations of bound and pseudobound vibrational states reported elsewhere [12] for Li3 in its first-excited electronic doublet state. A total of 1944 (1675), 1787 (1732), and 2349 (2387) vibrational states of A, Ai, and E symmetries have been computed without (with) consideration of the GP effect up to the Li2(63 X)u) +Li dissociation threshold of 0.0422 eV. Figure 9 shows the energy levels that have been calculated without consideration of the GP effect up to the dissociation threshold of the lower surface, 1.0560eV, in a total of 41, 16, and 51 levels of A], A2, and E symmetries. Note that they are genuine bound states. On the other hand, the cone states above the dissociation energy of the lower surface are embedded in a continuum, and hence appear as resonances in scattering experiments or long-lived complexes in unimolecular decay experiments. They are therefore pseudobound states or resonance states if the full two-state nonadiabatic problem is considered. The lowest levels of A, A2, and E symmetries lie at —1.4282,... 

Let us briefly discuss the characteristics of the nonadiabatic dynamics exhibited by this model. Assuming an initial preparation of the S2 state by an ideally short laser pulse. Fig. 1 displays in thick lines the first 500 fs of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of the system. The population probability of the diabatic S2 state shown in Fig. lb exhibits an initial decay on a timescale of 20 fs, followed by quasi-peiiodic recurrences of the population, which are... 

Let us first consider the population probability of the initially excited adiabatic state of Model 1 depicted in Fig. 17. Within the first 20 fs, the quantum-mechanical result is seen to decay almost completely to zero. The result of the QCL calculation matches the quantum data only for about 10 fs and is then found to oscillate around the quantum result. A closer analysis of the calculation shows that this flaw of the QCL method is mainly caused by large momentum shifts associated with the divergence of the nonadiabatic couplings F = We therefore chose to resort to a simpler approximation... 

Fiereby, Vq refers to the maximal electronic coupling element and p is the decay coefficient factor (damping factor), which depends primarily on the nature of the bridging molecule. From the linear plot of In ETmax versus R the p value is obtained as 0.60 A [47]. This p value is located within the boundaries of nonadiabatic ET reactions for saturated hydrocarbon bridges (0.8-1.0 A ) and unsaturated phenylene bridges (0.4 A ) [1-4,54,55]. 

If the system under consideration possesses non-adiabatic electronic couplings within the excited-state vibronic manifold, the latter approach no longer is applicable. Recently, we have developed a simple model which allows for the explicit calculation of RF s for electronically nonadiabatic systems coupled to a heat bath [2]. The model is based on a phenomenological dissipation ansatz which describes the major bath-induced relaxation processes excited-state population decay, optical dephasing, and vibrational relaxation. The model has been applied for the calculation of the time and frequency gated spontaneous emission spectra for model nonadiabatic electron-transfer systems. The predictions of the model have been tested against more accurate calculations performed within the Redfield formalism [2]. It is natural, therefore, to extend this... 

Understanding the mechanism of this nonadiabatic radiationless decay is central to explaining excited state processes. There are two possible mechanisms (see nonadiabatic reactions in Figure 1). When real surface crossings exist (conical intersection, see left side of Figure 1) and are accessible, the Landau-... 

---