Newton’s theory

The superiority of Einstein s over Newton s theory became manifest in 1915, when Einstein could for the first time explain an anomaly in the motion of the planet Mercuiy (advance of the perihelion), known obseiwationally since 1859. He also predicted that... 

Another way in which the general message that we endorse might be expressed is through clarification not of the notion of accommodation but instead of that of prediction . In fact scientists often use the notion of prediction in an atemporal sense—that is, one which carries no implicit requirement that predicted events have been hitherto unobserved. Here, for example, is a comment on Newton s theory from French s excellent textbook on Newtonian Mechanics (French, 1971, pp, 5-6 emphases added) ... 

Hall, Alfred Rupert and Marie Boas Hall. Newton s theory of matter. Isis 51 (Mar 1960) 163. 

Of course, Eq. (3) is valid for any particle. The question is Why is the speed of the photon there One may conjecture with DiMarzio [26] that there is a more fundamental meaning for c. In this context, Munera [27] explored the possibility of deriving the main predictions of STR from Newton s theory plus a postulate of mass-energy equivalence E = mK2. The value of the unknown constant K was obtained from the acceleration of electrons [28]. The numerical value is c within the limits of accuracy of the (large) experimental error. 

Einstein worked out the path of a planet round the sun on his new theory, and found that it came out almost exactly the same as on Newton s theory, which of course agrees very exactly with the observed motion. 

Thackray, A. (1970). Atoms and Poiners. An Essaj on Newtonian Matter-Theorj and the Development of Chemistry. London 119, 184 Donovan, A.L. (1975). Philosophical Chemistry in the Scottish Enlightenment. The Discoveries of William Cullen and Joseph Black. Edinburgh 31 Schofield, R.E. (1970b). Me-chanicism and Materialism. British Natural Philosophy in an Age of Eeason. New Jersey 211-212, 145 Shapiro, A.E. (1993). Fits, Passion and Paroxysms. Physics, Method, and Chemistry and Newton s Theories of Coloured Bodies and Fits of Easy Reflection. Cambridge 224. 

Shapiro, A.E. (1993). Fits, Passion and Paroxysms. Physics, Method, and Chemistry and Newton s Theories of Coloured Bodies and Fits of Eay Reflection. Cambridge. 

The mathematical details of the approach of Einstein s general relativity in approaching Newton s theory of universal gravitation are outlined in R. J. Adler, M.J. Bazin, and M. Schiffer, Introduction to General Relativity, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975, Chap. 10. Further details are discussed in Ref. 3, Chap. 19. 

According to Karl Popper, the method of science is the method of bold assumptions, of inventive and serious experiments to disprove. Karl Popper said that our knowledge based on hypotheses is assumptions. Knowledge of assumption has no final validity. For instance, Newton s theory of gravitation cannot explain the orbital properties of the planet Mercury Einstein s theory, however, took account of them. 

The first attempt to determine the orbit of a comet was made by the English astronomer Sir Edmund Halley (1656-1742), a close friend of Sir Isaac Newton. In 1687 Newton published his Principia, one of the most important books in the history of science. In it Newton described his theory of gravitation and demonstrated how that theory could be used to explain the motion of the planets and the Moon. Halley was intrigued by the possibility that Newton s theory might also be useful in explaining the behavior of the most unpredictable of all astronomical objects, the comets. 

Perhaps the most important connection between the two men was Halley s use of Newton s theory of gravitation to explain the motion of comets. Within a decade of the publication of the Principia, the scientific world had become convinced of the value of his theories in the explanation of the motion of the planets and of the Moon around the Earth. The same theories also explained a number of well-known physical phenomena that occur here on Earth. Scientists were not so certain, however, that Newton s theories had more general application, such as to the motions of stars, comets, meteors, and other astronomical objects. When Halley undertook to study the orbital properties of the comet of 1682, he was able to show that Newton s theories had much broader applications than had previously been appreciated. 

Theories now were becoming public rather than private they were disseminated more widely by the relatively newly invented printing press. Confidence in the new scientific method was now increasing rapidly many of the new theories (e.g. Newton s theories of 1666-1687) were confirmed by experiments. In particular, the new experiments and observations were showing decisively that the current theories were superior to those of the ancients—Aristotle s physics (that bodies move only if they are being pushed) was wrong, and Ptolemy s maps clearly had been in error. 

In 1687, the empirical law of Newton related the flow stress of a fluid to its velocity gradient. The constant of proportionality was the viscosity. In fact, the viscosity describes the internal resistance of the fluid to flow and deformation. For example, water has a low resistance to flow, hence its viscosity is lower compared to most oils, for example, that have a higher resistance (at room temperature). Fluids like water and most gases are ideal fluids that satisfy Newton s theory. Many real fluids have a much more complex relationship between stress, t, and the velocity gradient, (dy/dt) (y is the deformation). The viscosity of Newtonian fluids is represented by the symbol ft whereas for real fluids, it is represented by the symbol which is also known as the dynamic viscosity ... 

Legend has it that a falling apple inspired Newton s theory of gravitation. More likely the theory was the culmination of much thinking and several observations, of which the last perhaps involved an apple. Once his theory was tested in various situations and found satisfactory, it became known as a universal law. Newton s encounter with an apple may or may not have happened, but nevertheless the story conveys the most common method of discovery. This method, in which a few particular observations are extended to a single broad generality, is called induction. Tlie method is summarized schematically on the left side of Figure 0.1. (For more on the role of induction in scientific discovery, see Polya [1].)... 

NEWTONsche Theorie, level density, Newton s theory 300. 

Newton s theory, Term-Dichte, NEWTON5c/fe Theorie 300. 

The story of the flat Earth, borrowed from Isaac Asimov, reflects the common evolution of scientific models. Sometimes, models are discarded completely (e.g. phlogiston) but, more often, they are refined and taken to the next level of applicability (such as Newton s theory of gravity paving the way for Einstein s theory of relativity). How does it apply to organic chemistry How adequate are the undergraduate organic foundations for the broad understanding of structure and reactivity Do we really need to go deeper ... 

---