Network, aggregate model

In conclusion, exact relationships between the Young s modulus and the microstructure of particulate aggregate networks have been obtained. The elastic properties of such materials are a function of the total amount of solid material present, the properties of the particles which make up the solid, and the spatial distribution of solid particles within the network. This model can be utilized to better understand and modify the macroscopic rheological properties of soft materials and fat crystal networks in particular. 

In the case of the PS-DV6 networks, aggregates of from about 1 to 34 D-PS molecules were formed with radii of gyration ranging upwards to 350 to 400A. The Schelten correlation network model seems to fit the present data better than other models at this time. 

Maravelias and Grossmann (2004) have recently developed a hybrid MILP/CP method for the continuous time state-task-network (STN) model in which different objectives such as profit maximization, cost minimization, and makespan minimization can be handled. The proposed method relies on an MILP model that represents an aggregate of the original MILP model. This method has been shown to produce order of magnitude reductions in CPU times compared to standalone MILP or CP models. 

The concentration of monomers plays a very important role in aggregation models. We discussed this earlier in Section 9.4.2, where we noted that percolation through a network becomes realized only when a limit concentration of connections is exceeded. 

In summary it is evident that despite the highly simplistic nature of the assumptions made the aggregate model provides an appropriate model for a number of important pol3miers. For such materials details of the crystal structure can play no more than a subsidiary role in the development of mechanical anisotropy, and the deformation is essentially that expected for a single-phase texture or a distorted network. 

This pore-scale drying model is very dose to physical reality, but will require geometrical information about the particle network that may be obtained from Monte-Carlo aggregation models (e.g., Rottereau et al. (2004)). The model additionally requires parametrization due to the small dimensions, this will have to be done by calibration ofthe simulated macroscopic behavior by experiments on small gel samples. 

In example 2 a simpler approach is used to correctly handle backward cycles (co-products). The difference to the forward cycle is that the co-product quant B created by a quant A cannot be used as predecessor of A, because cycles in the quant network are not allowed (violates the cause effect principle). A model can avoid this cycles using aggregation in such a way that cycles are within these quants A and B (see Figure 4.15). 

A production location comprises one or multiple production plants where production resources are located. Production resources are single units or groups of production units aggregated to production lines or assets. Having the structure of chemical commodity value chain network as a network of chemical production processes in mind presented in fig. 34 (Al-Sharrah et al. 2001), production locations include respective resources and transportation lanes between production locations to model relations in chemical Verbund structures. 

In contrast to generalized mass-action models, an S-system model is obtained by lumping (or aggregating) all synthesizing and consuming reactions of each metabolite into a single power-law term, respectively. The mathematical structure of a S-System is independent of the complexity of the network. For any metabolite. S, -, we obtain... 

---