Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nearly free particle model

The important physical properties of simple metals and, in particular, the alkali metals can be understood in terms of a free electron model in which the most weakly bound electrons of the constituent atoms move freely throughout the volume of the metal (231). This is analogous to the free electron model for conjugated systems (365) where the electrons are assumed to be free to move along the bonds throughout the system under a potential field which is, in a first approximation, constant (the particle-in-a-box model). The free electron approach can be improved by replaeing the constant potential with a periodic potential to represent discrete atoms in the chain (365). This corresponds to the nearly free electron model (231) for treating electrons in a metal. [Pg.5]

The principal difficulty in solving the Boltzmann equation lies in the analytically intractable collision term. For small disturbances from equilibrium, the collision term may be linearized. Another approach is the calculation of transfer processes about a particle using a relaxation model for the collision term. It would be expected that such models would be most successful in near-free-molecular conditions where the "free-streaming" terms are much more important than collisions between host-gas molecules. The so-called BGK model is perhaps the most widely applied of these models [2.5,6]. [Pg.43]

Fig.5.1. Results of model calculation of near-free molecular particle charging ratio of colli si onal flux correction G to free molecular flux Gq vs nondimensionalized Coulomb interaction e parameterizes image potential (see Sect.5.2.2 of text)... Fig.5.1. Results of model calculation of near-free molecular particle charging ratio of colli si onal flux correction G to free molecular flux Gq vs nondimensionalized Coulomb interaction e parameterizes image potential (see Sect.5.2.2 of text)...
Since these are model calculations based upon near-free-molecular gas densities, the example given may be considered meaningful for pressures under 5 atm and for particles of under 100 nm. [Pg.129]

Trapping of particles A by B is described as earlier in terms of the black sphere model (3.2.16). A model of particle reproduction by division (8.2.6) along with a simplification of integral terms has also the following advantage. Creation of particles, as it was shown in Chapter 7 leads usually to the problem of the proper account of free volume available for particles A the superposition approximation is valid here only for small dimensionless particle concentrations. In our treatment of the reproduction this problem does not arise since prey animals A appear near other A s which are outside the... [Pg.476]

Based on the use of the NARCM regional model of climate and formation of the field of concentration and size distribution of aerosol, Munoz-Alpizar et al. (2003) calculated the transport, diffusion, and deposition of sulfate aerosol using an approximate model of the processes of sulfur oxidation that does not take the chemical processes in urban air into account. However, the 3-D evolution of microphysical and optical characteristics of aerosol was discussed in detail. The results of numerical modeling were compared with observational data near the surface and in the free troposphere carried out on March 2, 4, and 14, 1997. Analysis of the time series of observations at the airport in Mexico City revealed low values of visibility in the morning due to the small thickness of the ABL, and the subsequent improvement of visibility as ABL thickness increased. Estimates of visibility revealed its strong dependence on wind direction and aerosol size distribution. Calculations have shown that increased detail in size distribution presentation promotes a more reliable simulation of the coagulation processes and a more realistic size distribution characterized by the presence of the accumulation mode of aerosol with the size of particles 0.3 pm. In this case, the results of visibility calculations become more reliable, too. [Pg.46]

Figure 19.1 (A) 2D projection of the calculated local field intensity distribution around a pair of 15 nm diameter silver nanoparticles excited with Xi = 400 nm light polarized along the interpaiticle axis. The edge-to-edge particle separation is 2 nm and the free space incident light intensity Ej,x P taken to be unity. The local field intensity near the pair is shown in false color. The calculation was done using dipole-dipole approximation (DDA) method with each dipole unit being a square with sides of 0.2 nm. (B) Model of the photophysics of a molecule represented by a three level system and how the excitation and decay dynamics are affected by plasmon enhancement of radiative rates and the introducticm of a rate for quenching Icq of the excited state due to proximity to the metal surface. E (X ) and E (X2) are the field enhancements at the position of the molecule for the excitation and emission wavelengths respectively, kn and kMR represent the radiative and non-radiative decay rates of the molecule in the absence of plasmon enhancement. Figure 19.1 (A) 2D projection of the calculated local field intensity distribution around a pair of 15 nm diameter silver nanoparticles excited with Xi = 400 nm light polarized along the interpaiticle axis. The edge-to-edge particle separation is 2 nm and the free space incident light intensity Ej,x P taken to be unity. The local field intensity near the pair is shown in false color. The calculation was done using dipole-dipole approximation (DDA) method with each dipole unit being a square with sides of 0.2 nm. (B) Model of the photophysics of a molecule represented by a three level system and how the excitation and decay dynamics are affected by plasmon enhancement of radiative rates and the introducticm of a rate for quenching Icq of the excited state due to proximity to the metal surface. E (X ) and E (X2) are the field enhancements at the position of the molecule for the excitation and emission wavelengths respectively, kn and kMR represent the radiative and non-radiative decay rates of the molecule in the absence of plasmon enhancement.

See other pages where Nearly free particle model is mentioned: [Pg.152]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.1034]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.769]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.1959]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.243]   


SEARCH



Free-particle

Free-particle model

Model-free

Models particles

The nearly free particle model

© 2024 chempedia.info