Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

More than Topology

Earlier, we have defined cross-conjugation in terms of topology (Phelan and Orchin), but energetics matter for transport. The interference effects we have illustrated earlier resulted in a significant suppression of the current through the system, because the interference feature was very close to the Fermi energy. One of the interesting aspects of interference effects is that it allows us to turn electron transport on and off. To do this, we need to understand how to control and perturb interference effects chemically. [Pg.409]

As a final point, we note that what can be a small perturbation with an appropriate electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituent can be an extreme perturbation when heteroatoms are part of the ji-system. It is tempting to apply these rules, for heteroatom-containing systems also. Typical examples would [Pg.409]

11 Cross-Conjugation and Quantum Interference Electron withdrawing [Pg.410]

It remains to be seen whether useful electronic devices will be synthesized on the basis of these principles but, in the meantime, these systems provide a wonderful playground for chemists interested in molecular electronic design. [Pg.410]


As seen in Fig. 3.20, these elastic properties decrease rapidly at doses less than 0.1 MD-dpa and the decrease becomes smaller at high dose levels. Due to the dose dependence of the formation and coalescence of point defects and small clusters, it was concluded [18] that point defects and small clusters contribute much more than topological disorder to the degradation of the elastic properties of a-SiC. The elastic constants and elastic modulus showed the expected softening behavior under irradiation for the dose range of interest. [Pg.192]

Where more than one a helix connects two P strands (for example, between strands 4 and S), they are represented as one rectangle in the topology diagram. (Adapted from T.N. Bhat et al., /. Mol. Biol. 1S8 699-709, 1982.)... [Pg.59]

These topics provide the motivation for a brief topological review in Section 2, followed by some of the details of transferability properties in Section 3. Also in Section 3, some of the consequences of the Holographic Electron Density Fragment Theorem will be discussed, as well as the general proposition that No physical system with more than one quantum state is rigorously transferable . In fact, even atomic nuclei within molecules are not rigorously transferable. [Pg.58]

From the structural viewpoint there is much to commend the classification of problems based on the topology of the pipeline network— single branch pipelines, tree networks, and cyclic networks. However, since some methods are applicable to more than one category, rigorous adherence to this classification will lead to unnecessary duplication and overlaps. [Pg.172]

With respect to the intensity resolution relationship of NSE, PEB-2 [essentially PE with one ethyl branch every 50 main chain bonds the sample is obtained by saturating 1-4 polybutadiene, the residual 1-2 groups (7%) cause the ethyl branches Mw = 73200 g/mol Mw/Mn = 1.02] has two advantages compared to PEP (1) the Rouse rate W/4 of PEB-2 is more than two times faster than that of PEP at a given temperature [W/pEP (500 K) = 3.3 x 1013 A4s 1 W/pEB (509 K) = 7 x 1013A4s-1] (2) at the same time, the topological constraints are stronger. [Pg.49]

Complex polymers are distributed in more than one molecular property, for example, comonomer composition, functionality, molecular topology, or molar mass. Liquid chromatographic techniques can be used to determine these properties. However, one single technique cannot provide information on the correlation of different properties. A useful approach for determining correlated properties is to combine a selective separation technique with an information-rich detector or a second selective separation technique. [Pg.392]

A CDF is interpreted in the same way as a CLD or an IDF. All these functions exhibit the probability distributions of domain size and arrangement. Clearer than a CLD is the IDF, because it does not contain an orientation average but exhibits the topology in a selected direction. Clearer than an IDF is the CDF, because it visualizes the nanodomain topology in space, i.e., in more than one direction. [Pg.170]


See other pages where More than Topology is mentioned: [Pg.39]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.1645]    [Pg.2777]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.797]    [Pg.837]    [Pg.239]   


SEARCH



More Than

© 2024 chempedia.info