Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Monolayers, microbubble surfactant

As can be seen from Fig. 6.3, it was found that the partially purified, microbubble-surfactant mixture does in fact form stable monomolecular films at an air/(distilled) water interface. During the first compression-expansion cycle a minor degree of hysteresis was observed, but this effect was essentially absent during recompression (Fig. 6.3) and is probably due to the presence of various contaminants in the microbubble-surfactant mixture (see Section 6.3). It was further found that these microbubble-surfactant monolayers remain quite insoluble (cf. Section 6.1.3) when highly compressed, i.e., up to measured surface pressures of 24 dyne/cm. [Pg.119]

Fig. 6.3. Surface pressure-area ( II-A ) curves for a microbubble-surfactant monolayer spread at the air/(distilled) water interface. (Note that area is expressed as m2/mg protein in this figure and Figs. 6.4 and 6.5, which is also equivalent to m2/110 mg of microbubble-surfactant mixture. See text for further discussion. Taken from ref. 361.)... Fig. 6.3. Surface pressure-area ( II-A ) curves for a microbubble-surfactant monolayer spread at the air/(distilled) water interface. (Note that area is expressed as m2/mg protein in this figure and Figs. 6.4 and 6.5, which is also equivalent to m2/110 mg of microbubble-surfactant mixture. See text for further discussion. Taken from ref. 361.)...
Fig. 6.4. Surface pressure-area ( II-A ) curves for microbubble-surfactant monolayers spread on various aqueous subphases. (Taken from ref. 361.)... Fig. 6.4. Surface pressure-area ( II-A ) curves for microbubble-surfactant monolayers spread on various aqueous subphases. (Taken from ref. 361.)...
BONDING WITHIN COMPRESSED MICROBUBBLE-SURFACTANT MONOLAYERS... [Pg.124]

Fig. 6.4 shows the IT-A curves obtained for microbubble-surfactant monolayers on a variety of aqueous subphases. In order to compare Il-A measurements for monolayers which would contain essentially only glycopeptide-acyl lipid complexes, the data plotted in Fig. 6.4 include only Il-A measurements made during the expansion phase (following an initial compression to at least 23 dyne/cm). Judging from the fact that subphases of either distilled water, 0.1 M HC1 (pH 1.1), 0.1 M NaOH (pH 12.3), or 0.1 M NaF... [Pg.124]

Interestingly, the FIA-FI plots for microbubble-surfactant monolayers on subphases other than distilled water provide indirect evidence for induced association of the glycopeptide-acyl lipid complexes themselves. It can be seen from Fig. 6.5 that the monolayer data obtained on subphases of 0.1 M NaF, 0.1 M HC1,... [Pg.126]

In the series of microbubble experiments (ref. 394) included in this chapter, the actual film material, contained in compressed microbubble-surfactant monolayers, was collected for structural determinations using H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The resulting spectrum is then compared to the H-NMR spectrum which was obtained beforehand from the partially purified, microbubble surfactant mixture prior to monolayer formation and compression. [Pg.129]

Fig. 7.1 shows a typical H-NMR spectrum obtained with the partially purified, microbubble surfactant mixture prior to monolayer formation. For comparison, Table 7.1 gives the chemical-shift data for the proton resonances that can be readily identified in the 1 H-NMR spectra of long-chain acyl lipids (ref. 395-401). [Pg.129]

For the collection of monolayers, the microbubble surfactant mixture was spread (see above) and compressed to at least 24 dyne/cm. Thereafter, a rectangular piece of stainless steel mesh (4 cm x 1 cm, 30 mesh) was introduced vertically through the surface of the subphase, by means of a small handle, and alternately raised and lowered so that the air/water interface remained within the area of the mesh. This slow, vertical oscillation was coupled with a horizontal movement of the mesh along the surface of the subphase. The procedure resulted in a continual drop in the measured surface pressure (see above) as monolayer material gradually accumulated over the surface of the mesh. The surfactant-coated mesh was then transferred to and shaken in a glass vial containing high-purity ethanol. Once rinsed, the... [Pg.132]

The collected microbubble-surfactant monolayer material was subsequently lyophilized and redissolved in CD3OD. As with the preceding NMR measurements (see Section 7.1), H-NMR spectra at 270 MHz were obtained with the same Bruker Hx-270 NMR spectrometer. In this case, approximately 0.5% solutions (w/v in CD3OD) of the microbubble-surfactant monolayer material were employed in the measurements (all taken at 26°C). Tetra-methylsilane was used as an internal reference standard (ref. 394). [Pg.133]

Fig. 7.2 shows a typical H-NMR spectrum obtained with microbubble-surfactant material collected from compressed mono-layers. Comparison of this spectrum with Fig. 7.1 clearly demonstrates that the characteristic family of peaks originating from carbohydrate material (ref. 402,403), between 8 values of 3.4-3.8 ppm, is markedly reduced following monolayer formation and compression. (Note, for example, the relative area and maximum height of the terminal methyl group (8 = 0.9 ppm) versus the carbohydrate family of peaks (8 = 3.4-3.8 ppm) within each of the two spectra (Figs. 7.1 and 7.2).) Contrariwise, the characteristic peaks (cf. Table 7.1) for methylene chains (8 = 1.3 ppm) and terminal methyl groups (8 = 0.9 ppm) of long-chain lipids remain essentially unaltered (Fig. 7.2). [Pg.133]

However, the peaks usually associated (cf. Table 7.1) with CH3 and CH2 attached to olefinic carbon (8 = 1.6 and 2.0, respectively) show a relative reduction in height and area. This finding suggests that compression of the microbubble-surfactant monolayer results in the ejection of some unsaturated lipids, as well as most of the carbohydrate material, from the monolayer. Such a conclusion is consistent with the frequently mentioned... [Pg.133]

CHEMICAL SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MICROBUBBLE-SURFACTANT MONOLAYERS AND LIPID SURFACE FILMS AT THE AIR/SEA INTERFACE... [Pg.135]

J.S. D Arrigo, Surface properties of microbubble-surfactant monolayers at the air/water interface, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 100 (1984) 106-111. [Pg.287]

MOLECULAR PACKING WITHIN THE MICROBUBBLE S SURFACTANT MONOLAYER... [Pg.199]


See other pages where Monolayers, microbubble surfactant is mentioned: [Pg.101]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.95]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.115 ]




SEARCH



Microbubble

Microbubbles

Monolayers surfactants

Monolayers, microbubble surfactant complexes

Monolayers, microbubble surfactant material

Packing within the Microbubbles Surfactant Monolayer

Surfactants monolayer

© 2024 chempedia.info