Monolayer formation time

A technique frequently used to characterize the pressure state in the high vacuum regime is the calculation of the time required to form a monomolecular or monoatomic layer on a gas-free surface, on the assumption that every molecule will stick to fhe surface. This monolayer formation time is closely related with fhe so-called impingement rate z. With a gas at rest the impingement rate will indicate the number of molecules which collide with the surfece inside the vacuum vessel per unit of time and surface area ... 

If a is the number of spaces, per unit of surface area, which can accept a specific gas, then the monolayer formation time is... 

With the acceptance of the atomic view of the world - accompanied by the necessity to explain reactions in extremely dilute gases (where the continuum theory fails) - the kinetic gas theory was developed. Using this it is possible not only to derive the ideal gas law in another manner but also to calculate many other quantities involved with the kinetics of gases - such as collision rates, mean free path lengths, monolayer formation time. 

Therefore, in UFIV (p < 10 mbar) the monolayer formation time is of the order of minutes to hours or longer and thus of the same length of time as that needed for experiments and processes in vacuum. The practical requirements that arise have become particularly significant in solid-state physics, such as for the study of thin films or electron tube technology. A UFIV system is different from the usual high vacuum system for the following reasons ... 

Tests showed that liquid lubricants do not even provide adequate lubrication in the lower Vacuums of space simulators. Solid lubricants, such as molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide. and the soft metals have given better results. However, the known data about space lubricants are results of simulator measurements made in the pressure range of 10 s to 1C6 torr which does not simulate real space conditions, and therefore, these available data cannot be considered completely valid. It can be expected that definite data on lubricant performance in a vacuum will be obtained by conducting tests in a simulator that reaches the low 10"10 torr range. At this press level, the monolayer formation time is increased to at least several hours which will result in a sufficient time span for observing the metal... 

Obviously, the nucleation is a randon process which is amplified by subsequent deposition of many thousands of silver atoms before the surface is completely covered (if integrated over the time interval of monolayer formation the current in each pulse corresponds to an identical charge). Such an amplification of random processes is the only way they can be observed. This situation is quite analogous, for example, to radioactive decay where a single disintegration is followed, in a Geiger tube, by the flow of millions of electrons. ... 

Figure 15 An increase in transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) of MDCK cell monolayers with time in culture reflects the gradual formation of a continuous sheet of epithelia with restrictive tight junctions. [Redrawn from Cho et al. (1989) with permission from the publisher.]...

Fig. 5.22. The variation in r for fits to various /p,p(0 signals obtained for potential steps cathodic (overpotential, A E> 0) and anodic of the potential of the peak current for single monolayer formation. The error bars for data at A <80 mV are two standard deviations. The error bars at AE= 235 and 245 mV are the range of r that fit different time segments of the decaying signal. From Ref. 117.

In seeking to understand those processes that contribute to the dynamics of monolayer formation, it is important to consider the role of mass transport to the electrode surface. Assuming linear diffusion conditions for micromolar concentrations in solution, a monolayer in which the surface coverage is 1.1 x 10-10 mol cm-2 will require a layer approximately 0.01 cm thick within the solution to be depleted of [Os(bpy)2 (p3p)2]2+- The characteristic time, t, for this diffusion process is given by the following equation ... 

This method combines the advantages of microfluidic real-time analysis with the cost-effectiveness of microanalytical devices. In contrast with the monolayer array confined to a microtiter-plate, it prevents problems such as solvent evaporation during the monolayer formation. Furthermore, it reduces dramatically the occupied space and the amount of reagents, enhances the automation of the fabrication process, and allows for continuous monitoring of analyte solutions. Regeneration of the channel activity for the sequential testing of multiple analytes is also possible. 

The degree of silanization and thereby the water wettability is controlled by the exposure time, the amount of silane used, and importantly the concentration of water. Water has a big influence on the mechanism of the silane monolayer formation and structural properties. In the absence of water submonolayers with only one siloxane bond binding can be formed. Water promotes the hydrolysis of the remaining SiCl groups on the initial immobilized silane layer enabling another silanization reaction yielding enhanced silane density. However excess water leads to uncontrolled silane... 

The phenomenon of surface pressure has been studied since the late nineteenth century. Some consequences of insoluble monolayer formation were known (but not understood) as early as Biblical times and were of interest to the likes of Benjamin Franklin. For example, the pouring of oil on stormy waters was recognized as an effective measure to protect fragile ships in a storm. 

Figure 13. (a) Theoretical and experimental current-time transients for multinuclear multilayer growth. Drawn line, Ref. 46 dashed line. Ref. 45 circles Monte Carlo simulation. Ref. 49 dash-dot-dash line first monolayer formation. The hatched area represents the range of variation of the experimental i vs. t curves obtained at different overpotentials on dislocation-free Ag (100) faces. " All transients normalized to the I max and max at the first layer formation, (b) Experimental current transient for multinuclear multilayer growth, rj = 14 mV. Vertical sensitivity, 2 ptA/div time base, 5 msec/div. 

By the addition of the surfactant, such as phosphate ester, into the adhesive, the peel strength decreased with time and at the wide range of rates. The surfactant migrated to the interface after bonding by the amount for monolayer formation and the excess remained in the adhesive. 

It is known that even condensed films must have surface diffusional mobility Rideal and Tadayon [64] found that stearic acid films transferred from one surface to another by a process that seemed to involve surface diffusion to the occasional points of contact between the solids. Such transfer, of course, is observed in actual friction experiments in that an uncoated rider quickly acquires a layer of boundary lubricant from the surface over which it is passed [46]. However, there is little quantitative information available about actual surface diffusion coefficients. One value that may be relevant is that of Ross and Good [65] for butane on Spheron 6, which, for a monolayer, was about 5 x 10 cm /sec. If the average junction is about 10 cm in size, this would also be about the average distance that a film molecule would have to migrate, and the time required would be about 10 sec. This rate of Junctions passing each other corresponds to a sliding speed of 100 cm/sec so that the usual speeds of 0.01 cm/sec should not be too fast for pressurized film formation. See Ref. 62 for a study of another mechanism for surface mobility, that of evaporative hopping. 

When a ledge is formed on an atomically smooth monolayer during tire formation of a thin film the intensity of the diffraction pattern is reduced due to the reduction in the beatrr intensity by inelastic scattering of electrons at the ledge-monolayer junction. The diffraction intensity catr thus be used during deposition of several monolayers to indicate the completion of a monolayer through the relative increase in intensity at tlris time. Observation of this effect of intensity oscillation is used in practice to count the number of monolayers which are laid down during a deposition process. 

---