Molecular orbitals coupled-cluster theory

With any type of molecular modeling, there is generally a tradeoff between cost and reliability, and one typically shuns models that cost more without increasing reliability. In practice, this cost is usually expressed as computational effort, or computer time. In gas phase modeling, one typically finds molecular mechanics and semiempirical molecular orbital theory at the low-cost end and multireference configuration interaction or coupled-cluster theory at the other, with the choice dictated by the size of the system. System size also influences the choice of solvation model. We consider first the least expensive models, those that take no account of the quantum mechanical nature of the solute. 

Tel. 904-392-1597, fax. 904-392-8722, e-mail aces2 qtp.ufl.edu Ab initio molecular orbital code specializing in the evaluation of the correlation energy using many-body perturbation theory and coupled-cluster theory. Analytic gradients of the energy available at MBPT(2), MBPT(3), MBPT(4), and CC levels for restricted and unrestricted Hartree-Fock reference functions. MBPT(2) and CC gradients. Also available for ROHE reference functions. UNIX workstations. 

By ab initio we refer to quantum chemical methods in which all the integrals of the theory, be it variational or perturbative, are exactly evaluated. The level of theory then refers to the type of theory employed. Common levels of theory would include Hartree-Fock, or molecular orbital theory, configuration interaction (Cl) theory, perturbation theory (PT), coupled-cluster theory (CC, or coupled-perturbed many-electron theory, CPMET), etc. - We will use the word model to designate approximations to the Hamiltonian. For example, the zero differential overlap models can be applied at any level of theory. The distinction between semiempirical and ab initio quantum chemistry is often not clean. Basis sets, for example, are empirical in nature, as are effective core potentials. The search for basis set parameters is not usually considered to render a model empirical, whereas the search for parameters in effective core potentials is so considered. 

There are numerous alternative methods that introduce electron correlation in the molecular calculations at a more precise level that can be profitably used. We mention here the MC-SCF approach (the acronym means that this is a variant of HF (or SCF) procedure starting fi om the optimization no more of a single antisymmetric orbital product, but of many different products, or configurations), the Coupled-Cluster theory, etc., all methods based on a MO description of single-electron functions. 

Tel. 904-392-1597, fax 904-392-8722, e-mail aces2 qtp.ufl.edu Ab initio molecular orbital code specializing in the evaluation of the correlation energy using many-body perturbation theory and coupled-cluster theory. Ana-... 

However, due to the availability of numerous techniques, it is important to point out here the differences and equivalence between schemes. To summarize, two EDA families can be applied to force field parametrization. The first EDA type of approach is labelled SAPT (Symmetry Adapted Perturbation Theory). It uses non orthogonal orbitals and recomputes the total interaction upon perturbation theory. As computations can be performed up to the Coupled-Cluster Singles Doubles (CCSD) level, SAPT can be seen as a reference method. However, due to the cost of the use of non-orthogonal molecular orbitals, pure SAPT approaches remain limited... 

Various theoretical methods and approaches have been used to model properties and reactivities of metalloporphyrins. They range from the early use of qualitative molecular orbital diagrams (24,25), linear combination of atomic orbitals to yield molecular orbitals (LCAO-MO) calculations (26-30), molecular mechanics (31,32) and semi-empirical methods (33-35), and self-consistent field method (SCF) calculations (36-43) to the methods commonly used nowadays (molecular dynamic simulations (31,44,45), density functional theory (DFT) (35,46-49), Moller-Plesset perturbation theory ( ) (50-53), configuration interaction (Cl) (35,42,54-56), coupled cluster (CC) (57,58), and CASSCF/CASPT2 (59-63)). 

The theory for this intermolecular electron transfer reaction can be approached on a microscopic quantum mechanical level, as suggested above, based on a molecular orbital (filled and virtual) approach for both donor (solute) and acceptor (solvent) molecules. If the two sets of molecular orbitals can be in resonance and can physically overlap for a given cluster geometry, then the electron transfer is relatively efficient. In the cases discussed above, a barrier to electron transfer clearly exists, but the overall reaction in certainly exothermic. The barrier must be coupled to a nuclear motion and, thus, Franck-Condon factors for the electron transfer process must be small. This interaction should be modeled by Marcus inverted region electron transfer theory and is well described in the literature (Closs and Miller 1988 Kang et al. 1990 Kim and Hynes 1990a,b Marcus and Sutin 1985 McLendon 1988 Minaga et al. 1991 Sutin 1986). 

Linear-response coupled-cluster Many-body perturbation theory of order n Molecular orbital... 

---