Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular interaction potential with

Complexes of anions with electron-deficient r-tetrazine aromatic rings and other binding units have been studied and compared using both high-level MP2/6-311-l-G ab initio and molecular interaction potential with and without polarization and molecular electrostatic potential calculations, in order to explore the physical nature of the interactions <2003CPL(370)7>. [Pg.643]

GMlPp General molecular interaction potential with polarization... [Pg.128]

In the second picture, an interfacial layer or region persists over several molecular diameters due to a more slowly decaying interaction potential with the solid (note Section X-7C). This situation would then be more like the physical adsorption of vapors (see Chapter XVII), which become multilayer near the saturation vapor pressure (e.g.. Fig. X-15). Adsorption from solution, from this point of view, corresponds to a partition between bulk and interfacial phases here the Polanyi potential concept may be used (see Sections X-7C, XI-1 A, and XVII-7). [Pg.390]

There are many large molecules whose mteractions we have little hope of detemiining in detail. In these cases we turn to models based on simple mathematical representations of the interaction potential with empirically detemiined parameters. Even for smaller molecules where a detailed interaction potential has been obtained by an ab initio calculation or by a numerical inversion of experimental data, it is usefid to fit the calculated points to a functional fomi which then serves as a computationally inexpensive interpolation and extrapolation tool for use in fiirtlier work such as molecular simulation studies or predictive scattering computations. There are a very large number of such models in use, and only a small sample is considered here. The most frequently used simple spherical models are described in section Al.5.5.1 and some of the more common elaborate models are discussed in section A 1.5.5.2. section Al.5.5.3 and section Al.5.5.4. [Pg.204]

Molecules may vibrate and when they vibrate, their interaction with other molecules is modified. Vibrating molecules often appear bigger and more anisotropic. For selected systems, for example for hydrogen-rare gas pairs, vibrational dependences have been carefully modeled [227]. However, relatively few molecular interaction potentials are well known and for specific cases, one will have to search the recent literature for state of the art models. [Pg.22]

Like all mean-field theories, SCF theories replace the detailed, configuration-dependent interaction potentials with a mean potential averaged over the distribution of molecular configurations. Unlike other mean-field theories, SCF theory explicitly calculates the mean field by accounting for the polymer chain statistics. This field, in turn, controls the distribution of polymer configurations Hence the term self-consistent. ... [Pg.153]

H. Weinstein, S. Maayani, and S. Srebrenik, Mol. Pharmacol. 9(6), 820 (1973). Psychotomimetic Drugs as Anticholinergie Agents. II. Quantum-Mechanical Study of Molecular Interaction Potentials of 1-Cyclohexylpiperidine Derivatives with the Cholinergic Receptor. [Pg.458]

The numerical output of variational decompositions of AE (supplemented by some PT decompositions) nowadays represents the main source of information to model molecular interaction potentials. In the past, this modeling was largely based on experimental data (supported by PT arguments), but the difficulty of adding new experimental data, combined with the difficulty of giving an interpretation and a decoupling of them in the cases of complex molecules, has shifted the emphasis to theoretically computed values. [Pg.441]

Langevin Theory The theoretical treatment of ion-molecule reactions is presented. This is a useful aid in understanding the collision dynamics of two species. The collision rate for an ion and a polarizable molecule having no permanent dipole moment is given by the Langevin theory [2,3] as follows. For an ion and a molecitle approaching each other with a relative velocity v and impact parameter b (Fig. 2.1), the Langevin theory describes the molecular interaction potential between an ion... [Pg.22]

The characteristic adhesion distance In Eqs.( 1) and ( 4) lies in a molecular scale a = 3 =0 0.3 - 0.4 rum. It depends mainly on the properties of liquid-equivalent packed adsorbed layers and is to be estimated for a molecular interaction potential minimum. Provided that these molecular contacts are stiff enough compared with the soft particle contact behaviour influenced by mobile adsorption layers due to molecular rearrangement, this separation ap-o is assumed to be constant during loading and unloading in the interesting macroscopic pressure range of o = 0.1 - 100 kPa. The Hamaker constant solid-liquid-solid Ch,jIs acc. to Lifschitz theory is related to continuous media dependent on their permittivities (dielectric constants) and refractive indices, see Israelachvili [23]. [Pg.74]

Luckhurst and Simmonds [68] have used Lennard-Jones pair potentials to characterise the molecular interaction potential f/av(H], 2 for two liquid crystal molecules with molecular long axes in the direc-... [Pg.116]

The theoretical treatments of Section III-2B have been used to calculate interfacial tensions of solutions using suitable interaction potential functions. Thus Gubbins and co-workers [88] report a molecular dynamics calculation of the surface tension of a solution of A and B molecules obeying Eq. III-46 with o,bb/ o,aa = 0.4 and... [Pg.67]

We have two interaction potential energies between uncharged molecules that vary with distance to the minus sixth power as found in the Lennard-Jones potential. Thus far, none of these interactions accounts for the general attraction between atoms and molecules that are neither charged nor possess a dipole moment. After all, CO and Nj are similarly sized, and have roughly comparable heats of vaporization and hence molecular attraction, although only the former has a dipole moment. [Pg.228]


See other pages where Molecular interaction potential with is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.714]   


SEARCH



Molecular interaction potential with polarization

Molecular interactions

Molecular interactive

Molecular potential

© 2024 chempedia.info