Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular dynamics simulation solute-solvent interactions

Specific solute-solvent interactions involving the first solvation shell only can be treated in detail by discrete solvent models. The various approaches like point charge models, siipennoleciilar calculations, quantum theories of reactions in solution, and their implementations in Monte Carlo methods and molecular dynamics simulations like the Car-Parrinello method are discussed elsewhere in this encyclopedia. Here only some points will be briefly mentioned that seem of relevance for later sections. [Pg.839]

Hybrid MPC-MD schemes may be constructed where the mesoscopic dynamics of the bath is coupled to the molecular dynamics of solute species without introducing explicit solute-bath intermolecular forces. In such a hybrid scheme, between multiparticle collision events at times x, solute particles propagate by Newton s equations of motion in the absence of solvent forces. In order to couple solute and bath particles, the solute particles are included in the multiparticle collision step [40]. The above equations describe the dynamics provided the interaction potential is replaced by Vj(rJVs) and interactions between solute and bath particles are neglected. This type of hybrid MD-MPC dynamics also satisfies the conservation laws and preserves phase space volumes. Since bath particles can penetrate solute particles, specific structural solute-bath effects cannot be treated by this rule. However, simulations may be more efficient since the solute-solvent forces do not have to be computed. [Pg.112]

To make an accurate FEP calculation, a good description of the system is required. This means that the parameters for the chosen force field must reproduce the dynamic behaviour of both species correctly. A realistic description of the environment, e.g. size of water box, and the treatment of the solute-solvent interaction energy is also required. The majority of the parameters can usually be taken from the standard atom types of a force field. The electrostatic description of the species at both ends of the perturbation is, however, the key to a good simulation of many systems. This is also the part that usually requires tailoring to the system of interest. Most force fields require atom centered charges obtained by fitting to the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), usually over the van der Waals surface. Most authors in the studies discussed above used RHF/6-31G or higher methods to obtain the MEP. [Pg.133]

This volume of Modem Aspects covers a wide spread of topics presented in an authoritative, informative and instructive manner by some internationally renowned specialists. Professors Politzer and Dr. Murray provide a comprehensive description of the various theoretical treatments of solute-solvent interactions, including ion-solvent interactions. Both continuum and discrete molecular models for the solvent molecules are discussed, including Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. The advantages and drawbacks of the resulting models and computational approaches are discussed and the impressive progress made in predicting the properties of molecular and ionic solutions is surveyed. [Pg.8]

I. Benjamin, Chemical reactions and solvation at liquid interfaces a microscopic perspective, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D. C.), 96 (1996) 1449-75 I. Benjamin, Theory and computer simulations of solvation and chemical reactions at liquid interfaces, Acc. Chem. Res., 28 (1995) 233-9 L. R. Martins, M. S. Skaf and B. M. Ladanyi, Solvation dynamics at the water/zirconia interface molecular dynamics simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B, 108 (2004) 19687-97 J. Faeder and B. M. Ladanyi, Solvation dynamics in reverse micelles the role of headgroup-solute interactions, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 6732 10 W. H. Thompson, Simulations of time-dependent fluorescence in nano-confined solvents, J. Chem. Phys., 120 (2004) 8125-33. [Pg.388]

The main advantage of the MFA is that it permits one to dramatically reduce the computational requisites associated with the study of solvent effects. This allows one to focus attention on the solute description, and it consequently becomes possible to use calculation levels similar to those usually employed in the study of systems and processes in the gas phase. Furthermore, in the case of ASEP/MD this high level description of the solute is combined with a detailed description of the solvent structure obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. Thanks to these features ASEP/MD [8] enables the study of systems and processes where it is necessary to have simultaneously a good description of the electron correlation of the solute and the explicit consideration of specific solute-solvent interactions, such as for VIS-UV spectra [9] or chemical reactivity [10]. [Pg.580]

A problem with this interpretation relates to electrostriction, a process in which the density of the solvent changes about a solute. Shim et al. [243] noted evidence of electrostriction in molecular dynamics simulations of a model chromophore in an IL, and the degree of electrostriction was sensitive to the charge distribution of the solute. This observation does not necessarily contradict the framework above, as some local disruption of solvent structure due to dispersive interactions is inevitable. However, it is desirable to obtain a clearer understanding of the competition between these local interactions and the need to maintain a uniform charge distribution in the liquid. [Pg.120]


See other pages where Molecular dynamics simulation solute-solvent interactions is mentioned: [Pg.159]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.2559]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.638]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.116 , Pg.117 , Pg.118 , Pg.119 ]




SEARCH



Dynamic simulation

Dynamical interaction

Dynamical simulations

Dynamical solute-solvent interactions

Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Molecular dynamics interactions

Molecular interactions

Molecular interactive

Molecular simulations

Molecular solution

Simulated solutions

Solute-solvent interactions

Solution molecular dynamics

Solutions solvents

Solvent dynamics

Solvent molecular

Solvent simulation

Solvents, interactive

© 2024 chempedia.info