Solute-free mole fractions

Also Fryar and Kaufman8 studied the solvent effect on the stability of barium dinonylnaphthalene sulfonate in toluene, toluene/methanol, and methanol solutions by ultracentrifugation and viscometry. The aggregation number of the micelles reduced from about 10 in toluene to about 4 when the mole fraction of free methanol in the solvent mixture was approximately 0.03. In pure methanol BaDNNS micelles did not exist. 

L - solute-free liquid flow rate. Ib-mole/h ft2 (or kmol/h - m2) a. y = mole Fraction solute in liquid and gas phases, respectively X. Y > mole ratio of solute in liquid and gas phases, respectively... 

The solubilization of diverse solutes in micelles is most often examined in tenns of partitioning equilibria, where an equilibrium constant K defines the ratio of the mole fraction of solute in the micelle (X and the mole fraction of solute in the aqueous pseudophase. This ratio serves to define the free energy of solubilization -RT In K). 

Measuring Protein Sta.bihty, Protein stabihty is usually measured quantitatively as the difference in free energy between the folded and unfolded states of the protein. These states are most commonly measured using spectroscopic techniques, such as circular dichroic spectroscopy, fluorescence (generally tryptophan fluorescence) spectroscopy, nmr spectroscopy, and absorbance spectroscopy (10). For most monomeric proteins, the two-state model of protein folding can be invoked. This model states that under equihbrium conditions, the vast majority of the protein molecules in a solution exist in either the folded (native) or unfolded (denatured) state. Any kinetic intermediates that might exist on the pathway between folded and unfolded states do not accumulate to any significant extent under equihbrium conditions (39). In other words, under any set of solution conditions, at equihbrium the entire population of protein molecules can be accounted for by the mole fraction of denatured protein, and the mole fraction of native protein,, ie. 

Flow parameter (Norton Co.) = F = FP Concentration of solute in liquid, lb mol solute/lb mol solute free solvent (or stream) Concentration of solute in liquid, in equiUbri-um -with the gas, lb mol solute/lb mol solvent Concentration of solute in liquid, mole fraction, or mol fraction of more volatile component in liquid phase Curve fit coefficients for C2, Table 9-32 Curve fit coefficients for Cg, Table 9-32 Concentration of solute in liquid in equilibrium -with gas, mol fracdon Concentradon of solute in gas, lb mol solute/lb mol solute free (solvent) (stream) Capacity parameter (Norton)... 

In such a binary solution, the chemical potential of the solute and that of the solvent A/xg are related to the integral free energy of formation of the solution, AG per mole, containing a mole fraction Xp, of component A, and for component B, by the expression... 

Raoult s law over the whole range of composition, this is because the total change in the free energy, on mixing the particles, is given by nAkT In xA + n0kT In xB, where xA is the mole fraction of A in the solution and xB is the mole fraction of B. For a solution that contains in addition nc particles of species C, and so on, terms must be added, thus... 

The Conventional Standard Free Energy of Solution. Returning now to the solution of a crystalline solid, let us consider the free energy of solution. Taking a uni-univalent substance let AF denote the change in free energy per mole when additional ions are added to a solution at temperature T where the solute has the mole fraction x and let us fix attention on the quantity... 

The Disparity of a Solution. We may begin to use the word disparity in a technical sense, for the quantity defined above, and to speak of d as the disparity of the solution when the mole fraction of the solute is x. In dilute ionic solutions the sign of d is always negative. The effect of the interionic forces is that ions added to a dilute solution always lose more free energy than they would when added to the corresponding ideal solution hence the total communal term is less than the cratic term. 

We shall be interested in pairs of cells, in which the mole fraction of the solute in one solvent is equal to its mole fraction in the other solvent. Suppose then that a series of such pairs of cells is made up, with the solute at progressively greater dilutions. When the members of these pairs of cells are placed back to back, the resultant e.m.f. s will contain progressively smaller contributions from the intcrionic forces and, on extrapolation to extreme dilution, this contribution will be negligibly small. Since the mole fraction on each side is the same, the difference between the eratic terms will be zero. In any such scries of cells, the measured e.m.f. s when extrapolated to extreme dilution thus yield the unitary part of the change in free energy. 

As has been described in Chapter 4, random copolymers of styrene (St) and 2-(acrylamido)-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS) form a micelle-like microphase structure in aqueous solution [29]. The intramolecular hydrophobic aggregation of the St residues occurs when the St content in the copolymer is higher than ca. 50 mol%. When a small mole fraction of the phenanthrene (Phen) residues is covalently incorporated into such an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte, the Phen residues are hydrophobically encapsulated in the aggregate of the St residues. This kind of polymer system (poly(A/St/Phen), 29) can be prepared by free radical ter-polymerization of AMPS, St, and a small mole fraction of 9-vinylphenanthrene [119]. 

Fig. 4.18 represents a countercurrent-flow, packed gas absorption column, in which the absorption of solute is accompanied by the evolution of heat. In order to treat the case of concentrated gas and liquid streams, in which the total flow rates of both gas and liquid vary throughout the column, the solute concentrations in the gas and liquid are defined in terms of mole ratio units and related to the molar flow rates of solute free gas and liquid respectively, as discussed previously in Sec. 3.3.2. By convention, the mass transfer rate equation is however expressed in terms of mole fraction units. In Fig. 4.18, Gm is the molar flow of solute free gas (kmol/m s), is the molar flow of solute free liquid (kmol/m s), where both and Gm remain constant throughout the column. Y is the mole ratio of solute in the gas phase (kmol of solute/kmol of solute free gas), X is the mole ratio of solute in the liquid phase (kmol of...

To evaluate the logarithm, we must measure the vapor pressure Pa of A in equilibrium with a solution where its mole fraction is XA in the limit where the solution becomes infinitely dilute. That is, in the limit of infinite dilution where y is 1, the free energy of solvation can be obtained from measurement of the solute vapor pressure (in the appropriate standard state units) over a solution of known concentration. 

X is the mole ratio of solute in the liquid phase (kmol solute/kmol solute free liquid), y is the mole fraction of solute in the gas phase, x is the mole fraction of solute in the liquid phase and T is temperature (K). 

Xf, Xa and Xsci are the mole fractions of the complex [A.HCl], of the free aromatic substance and of HCl in the solution. The mole fractions... 

This is the mole fraction of the free aromatic substance present in the solution i.e. amount weighed out minus complex concentration. 

A concentration scale for solutes in aqueous solutions, equal to moles of solute/55.51 mol water. It is frequently used in studies of solvent isotope effects. As pointed out by Schowen and Schowen the choice of standard states can change the sign for the free energy of transfer of a species from one solvent to another, even from HOH and DOD. The commonly used concentration scales are molarity, mole fraction, aquamolality, and molality. Free energies tend to be nearly the same on all but the molality scale, on which they are about 63 cal mol more positive at 298 K than on the first three scales. The interested reader should consult Table I of Schowen and Schowen ... 

From the standpoint of the operational definition of the standard state for the above free energy changes, we must remember that, while mole fractions are strongly recommended composition measures (61 Mil), in practice, both molalities, m, and concentrations, c, are widely used. For dilute aqueous solutions at moderate temperatures the numerical values of m and c are only slightly different. This no longer holds for other solvents. 

In order to elucidate this point, viscosity measurements of living and deactivated PDMS solutions were performed In toluene, with Li+ + [211] as counterion. As no significant change was observed, It can be deduced that the fraction of aggregates Is negligible (< 1% for [C] 10 mole. " ). Moreover, conductance measurements made on model sllanolates In THF Indicate that the fraction of free Ions Is very low. In our system (benzene) we conclude therefore that the contribution to the reactivity from free ions can be neglected. Thus the main Ionic species are cryptated ion pairs, and... 

---